›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 3001-3010.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2428

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法

肖国峰,陈从新   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-07 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:肖国峰,男,1975年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩质边坡的稳定性评估方法和监测方法等方面的研究工作。

Simulation of progressive failure process and stability analysis method for rock block

XIAO Guo-feng, CHEN Cong-xing   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2017-12-07 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02

摘要: 岩桥的破裂贯通是一种非连续变形现象。强度折减技术虽然是渐进破坏过程模拟的主流技术,但其不具备描述非连续变形现象的能力。提出连通率折减法和刚度折减法来模拟含非贯通结构面岩块的渐进破坏过程,并建立考虑渐进破坏过程的块体稳定分析方法。首先,引入Goodman单元来描述共面非贯通结构面的岩桥部分和裂隙面部分,建立静力平衡方程来求解滑裂面内岩桥单元和裂隙面单元的应力。其次,岩桥单元采用Griffith准则来判别破坏,利用连通率折减法来描述其破裂;裂隙面单元采用MC准则来判别破坏,用刚度折减法来描述其屈服;通过循环迭代,模拟岩桥单元的破裂过程和裂隙面单元的应力调整过程,实现整个滑裂面的渐进破坏过程模拟。然后,定义考虑渐进破坏过程的滑裂面极限状态;通过自重超载方式将滑裂面推送至极限状态;基于极限状态设计的理论框架,计算度量块体稳定性的安全系数指标。工程实例分析结果表明,渐进破坏过程模拟结果与现场调查结果是一致的。渐进破坏过程的模拟实现,有助于岩质边坡变形破坏机制分析从定性分析阶段扩展至定量分析阶段。

关键词: 岩质边坡, 凸多面块体, 共面非贯通结构面, 连通率折减法, 刚度折减法, Goodman单元, 极限状态设计, 自重超载安全系数

Abstract: The fracture of the rock bridge is a discontinuous deformation phenomenon. Strength reduction method, although it is the mainstream approach for progressive failure process simulation, it can not describe the discontinuous deformation phenomenon. The connectivity rate reduction method and the stiffness reduction method are proposed to simulate the progressive failure process of the rock block bounded by the coplanar non-persistent joints, and a block stability analysis method considering the progressive failure process is established. Firstly, the Goodman element is introduced to describe the rock bridge part and the fracture part of the coplanar non-persistent joint. The stress of the rock bridge element and the fracture element in the slip surface is solved by the equation of static equilibrium. Secondly, Griffith criterion is used to judge the failure for rock bridge element, and the connectivity rate reduction method is used to describe its rupture. The MC criterion is used the to judge the failure for fracture element, and the stiffness reduction method is used to describe its yield. By cyclic iteration, rupture process of the rock bridge element and the stress redistribution process of the fracture element to realize the simulation of the progressive failure process of the whole slip surface. Then, the limit state of the slip surface is redefined considering the progressive failure process, and the slip surface is pushed to the limit state by the weight overload method. Based on the theoretical framework of the limit state design, the safety factor of the block stability is calculated. The results of the engineering examples show that the simulation results of the progressive failure process are consistent with the field survey results. The simulation of the progressive failure process is helpful to the analysis of the deformation mechanism of the rock slope from the qualitative analysis stage to the quantitative analysis stage.

Key words: rock slope, convex block, coplanar non-persistent joint, connectivity rate reduction method, stiffness reduction method, Goodman element, limit state design, weight-overloading factor of safety

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[2] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[3] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[4] 言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固 界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[5] 朱仁杰, 车爱兰, 严 飞, 文 海, 葛修润, . 含贯通性结构面岩质边坡动力演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1907-1915.
[6] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[7] 蒋水华,刘 贤,姚 池,杨建华,黄劲松,江先河,. 低概率水平岩质边坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2991-3000.
[8] 卞 康,刘 建,胡训健,李鹏程,陈玲朱,刘振平, . 含顺层断续节理岩质边坡地震作用下的破坏模式与动力响应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3029-3037.
[9] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[10] 周 勇,王旭日,朱彦鹏,李京榜,蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[11] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
[12] 徐奴文,李 韬,戴 峰,李 彪,樊义林,徐 剑,. 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸岩质边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2358-2367.
[13] 范 刚,张建经,付 晓, . 含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡传递函数及其应用研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1052-1059.
[14] 刘海军,赵建军,巨能攀,. 岩质边坡倾倒破坏的力学分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 289-294.
[15] 戴 峰 ,姜 鹏 ,徐奴文,周 钟,沙 椿,郭 亮,. 蓄水期坝肩岩质边坡微震活动性及其时频特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 359-370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!