›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 3029-3037.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0056

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

含顺层断续节理岩质边坡地震作用下的破坏模式与动力响应研究

卞 康1, 2,刘 建1, 2,胡训健1, 2, 3,李鹏程3,陈玲朱3,刘振平1, 2   

  1. (1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-11 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:卞康,男,1982年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程地质灾害机理与防控方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51779249,No. 51209198,No. 51204158);湖北省自然科学基金项目(No. 2018CFB632);中国科学院大学生创新实践训练计划。

Study on failure mode and dynamic response of rock slope with non-persistent joint under earthquake

BIAN Kang1, 2, LIU Jian1, 2, HU Xun-jian1, 2, 3, LI Peng-cheng3, CHEN Ling-zhu3, LIU Zhen-ping1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2017-01-11 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51779249, 51209198, 51204158), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2018CFB632) and the College of Creative Practice Training Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

摘要: 基于二维颗粒流软件PFC2D的人工合成岩体技术(SRM),研究了岩桥倾角和节理间距不同组合形式的含顺层断续节理岩质边坡在地震作用下的破坏模式与动力响应规律。研究结果显示:在地震动力作用下,含单潜在滑动面的顺层断续节理岩质边坡呈现出滑移-倾倒的混合破坏特征,含多潜在滑动面的顺层断续节理岩质边坡则主要发生倾倒破坏;由顺层断续节理以及岩桥交替连接所组成的潜在滑动面是控制边坡动力稳定性的关键因素。在地震动力作用下,最靠近坡脚的岩桥段首先萌生翼裂纹,使得拉应力得到释放,随后各节理相继萌生裂纹并扩展、贯通,最终导致坡体发生阶梯状整体失稳。裂纹扩展受顺层断续节理控制,萌生裂纹中以张拉裂纹为主,且裂纹数量与输入地震波的加速度曲线具有同步性。另一方面,节理面的存在对边坡动力响应产生明显影响,沿坡表以及沿水平方向上的峰值速度、峰值位移随着岩桥倾角的增大、节理间距的减小而增大,同时节理间距和岩桥倾角对于峰值加速度(PGA)放大系数的影响范围主要集中在坡表、坡肩;沿竖直方向上,峰值位移随着岩桥倾角、节理间距的增大而减小,PGA放大系数曲线随高程变化总体呈现U型分布特征。

关键词: 岩质边坡, 地震, 动力响应, 岩桥, 顺层断续节理, PFC

Abstract: Based on the two-dimensional particle flow software (PFC2D), this paper studied the failure modes and dynamic response laws of rock slope with non-persistent joints by the combination of different dip angles of rock bridge and joint spacing under earthquake. The results showed that the bedding non-persistent jointed rock slope with single potential sliding surface present the sliding-block toppling mixed failure under the action of seismic dynamics. While the bedding non-persistent jointed rock slope with multi-potential sliding surfaces mainly present the block toppling failure. The dynamic stability of the slope was mainly controlled by the potential sliding surface composed of non-persistent joints and alternate connections of rock. Under the action of seismic dynamics, the wing crack at the rock section closest to the foot of the slope was first generated, resulting in the released tensile stress. Successively, each joint started to crack and expand, which eventually led to the step-like instability. Crack propagation was controlled by bedding non-persistent joints. Cracks are dominated by tensile cracks, and the number of cracks was synchronous with the acceleration of the input seismic waves. The existence of the joint surface had a significant impact on the dynamic response of the slope. The peak velocity and displacement along the slope surface and the horizontal direction increased with the increase of the inclination angle of the rock bridge and the decrease of the joint spacing. Meanwhile, the effects of joint spacing and rock bridge inclination on the PGA amplification factor were mainly on the slope surface and shoulder. Along the vertical direction, the peak displacement decreased with the inclination of the rock bridge and the joint spacing, and the curve of the PGA amplification factor exhibited U-shaped distribution with the elevation change.

Key words: rock slope, earthquake, dynamic response, rock bridge, non-persistent joint, PFC

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[4] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[5] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[6] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[7] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[8] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[9] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[10] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[11] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[12] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[13] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[14] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[15] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!