›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 529-536.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0162

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏州粉土地层地连墙施工对地层扰动影响研究

朱 宁1,周 洋2,刘 维2,史培新2,吴 奔2   

  1. 1. 苏州轨道交通集团公司,江苏 苏州 215000;2. 苏州大学 轨道交通学院,江苏 苏州 215000
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-28 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 刘维,男,1985年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下工程和土力学研究。E-mail: ggoulmmeng@suda.edu.cn E-mail:18249743@qq.com
  • 作者简介:朱宁,男,1978年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地下工程设计和施工研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51778386, No. 51508503);大学生创新训练项目(No. 5731505417)

Study of silty soil behavior disturbed for installation of diaphragm wall in Suzhou

ZHU Ning 1, ZHOU Yang 2, LIU Wei 2, SHI Pei-xin 2, WU Ben 2   

  1. 1. Suzhou Rail Transit Group, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China; 2. School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China
  • Received:2018-01-28 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51778386, 51508503) and Student's Platform for Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program(5731505417).

摘要: 采用三维有限差分软件FLAC3D对地下连续墙施工进行模拟,分析苏州地区粉土地层中地连墙施工对土体扰动及周边建筑物影响。利用UBCSAND硬化规律对外部扰动作用下土体强度逐步发挥的力学特性进行表征,模拟开挖过程中浅层土体变形,并对地连墙施工中成槽开挖、钢筋混凝土施工及混凝土硬化进行全过程模拟。计算结果表明,硬化模型较好地反映地连墙施工扰动下浅层土体力学特性;地连墙成槽阶段地层变形随深度的增加而减小,地表以下20 m范围内地层变形显著,而深部土体变形较小;钢筋混凝土浇筑施工对地层变形起到抑制作用;混凝土硬化阶段地层变形趋于稳定。在该基础上采用硬化模型对苏州某基坑地连墙施工进行数值仿真,模拟结果和现场实测吻合较好。

关键词: 地连墙施工, 粉土地层, 硬化模型, 数值模拟, 地层变形, 建筑物沉降

Abstract: This paper investigates the soil behavior and adjacent building settlement disturbed by the installation of diaphragm wall. This investigation is carried out by the numerical software FLAC3D; and in this simulation, the UBCSAND model is adopted for the modelling. The feature of strain strengthen in this model is able to characterize the soil behavior at shallow depth. The trench excavation, cage reinforcement, concreting, and concrete hardening, involved the installation of wall panel is carefully simulated. The results show that: Thanks to the hardening model, the soil movement at the shallow depth is well simulated. At the depth smaller than 20m below the ground surface, the trench excavation caused a significant soil movement. The movement decreases with the depth and it maintains tiny in deep soil. The cage reinforcement and concreting alleviates the trend of the movement. During the concrete hardening, the soil movement tends to be stabilized. A project of diaphragm wall in Suzhou is re-examined by using the new model. The numerical results are consistent with the in-situ measurements.

Key words: diaphragm wall construction, silty soil, hardening model, numerical simulation, soil movement, building settlement

中图分类号: 

  • TU476+.3

[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[7] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[8] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[9] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[10] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[11] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[14] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!