›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3130-3138.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2913

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土中筒型基础沉放过程渗流特性和沉贯阻力研究

丁红岩1, 2,贾 楠2, 3,张浦阳1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072; 3. 交通运输部 天津水运工程科学研究院,天津 300456
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-15 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 作者简介:丁红岩,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程及海洋结构方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51779171,No.51679163);国家创新方法工作专项(No.2016IM030100);天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(No.15JCQNJC43900,No.17JCYBJC22000)

Research of seepage characteristics and penetration resistance during installation of bucket foundations in sand

DING Hong-yan1, 2, JIA Nan2, 3, ZHANG Pu-yang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, Tianjin 300456, China
  • Received:2016-12-15 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779171, 51679163), the Innovation Method Fund of China (2016IM030100) and Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (15JCQNJC43900, 17JCYBJC22000).

摘要: 筒型基础的沉放是一项关键施工过程,沉放时土体在施工负压下产生渗流场,而渗流对基础筒壁的侧摩阻力和端阻力产生影响,导致沉贯阻力难以预测。针对这一问题,首先应用试验和数值模拟的方法,对筒型基础沉贯过程中的渗流特性进行分析,揭示筒壁两侧及筒端土体超孔隙水压力的分布;然后将分析结果应用于沉贯阻力的推导中,并对推导的公式进行验证。研究表明:筒型基础沉贯过程中,筒壁两侧土体的超孔隙水压力沿筒壁深度几乎呈线性变化,在接近筒端时出现非线性变化;不同的沉贯深度下,渗流对沉贯阻力的影响不同,随着沉贯深度的增加,减小的阻力占总沉贯阻力的比值越来越大;通过推导的理论公式计算的试验模型和实际工程的沉贯负压理论计算值与实测值吻合较好。

关键词: 筒型基础, 砂土, 渗流特性, 沉贯阻力

Abstract: The penetration of the bucket foundation is a vital construction procedure. Seepage field is generated in the soil under the suction pressure during the penetration. The seepage has an influence on the friction along the skirt wall and on the resistance of the skirt tip, which leads to the difficulty in predicting penetration resistance. In order to solve this problem, firstly, the methods of experiment and numerical simulation were applied to analyze the seepage characteristics of the bucket foundation during the penetration; moreover the distribution of the excess pore water pressure along the bulkhead and skirt tip was revealed. Thereafter, the analytical results were applied to derive the penetration resistance, and the derived theoretical formulae were verified. The results show that during the penetration of the bucket foundation, the excess pore water pressure of the soil changes linearly along the depth of the skirt, but becomes nonlinearly near the skirt tip. The effect of seepage flow on the penetration resistance is different for different penetration depths; the reduced resistance caused by seepage accounts is for a greater proportion of the penetration resistance with increasing penetration depth. The suction pressure of the test model and practical engineering calculated by the theoretical formulae are in good agreement with the measured values.

Key words: bucket foundations, sand, seepage characteristics, penetration resistance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 纪文栋,张宇亭,王 洋,裴文斌, . 循环单剪下珊瑚钙质砂和普通硅质砂剪切特性对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 282-288.
[2] 史旦达,杨彦骋,邓益兵,刘文白,. 考虑转速比影响的砂土中螺旋挤扩钻具成孔特性宏细观模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1981-1990.
[3] 柳晓科,鹿 群,路士伟,刘春龙,郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[4] 付海清,袁晓铭,王 淼,. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
[5] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[6] 刘 笋,蒋明镜,付 昌,朱俊高,. 结构性砂土静力触探试验离散元分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 933-942.
[7] 李连祥,符庆宏,黄佳佳, . 砂土地基和粉质黏土地基基坑悬臂开挖离心模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 529-536.
[8] 陆 勇,周国庆,顾欢达,. 高低压下不同力学特性的砂土统一模型[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 614-620.
[9] 罗 岚,夏唐代,仇浩淼, . K0条件下颗粒形状特征对砂土剪切模量的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3695-3702.
[10] 祁 越,刘 润,练继建,. 无黏性土中筒型基础负压下沉模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 139-150.
[11] 吴则祥,金银富,季 慧,尹振宇,. 易破碎砂土地基中“平底桩”贯入数值模拟分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 330-336.
[12] 张冬梅,高程鹏,尹振宇,王如路,杨天亮,. 隧道渗流侵蚀的颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 429-438.
[13] 汪北方,梁 冰,孙可明,武占超,孙维吉,姜利国,王俊光,. 典型浅埋煤层长壁开采覆岩采动响应与控制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2693-2700.
[14] 练继建,马煜祥,王海军,王芃文,蒋杏雨, . 筒型基础在粉质黏土中的静压沉放试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1856-1862.
[15] 陈洲泉,黄茂松, . 基于状态相关本构模型的砂土非共轴特性模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1959-1966.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 磊,朱 伟 ,林 城,大木宜章. 干湿循环条件下固化污泥的物理稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3001 -3004 .
[2] 余 俊,尚守平,李 忠,任 慧. 饱和土中桩水平振动引起土层复阻抗分析研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3858 -3864 .
[3] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[4] 徐 超,郭宏峰,杨晓明,邢皓枫. 普硅水泥和矿渣水泥加固滨海软土效果对比分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2737 -2740 .
[5] 张 敏,吴宏伟. 离心试验中的地下水模拟控制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 355 -360 .
[6] 张 磊,孙树林,龚晓南,张 杰. 循环荷载下双曲线模型修正土体一维固结解[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 455 -460 .
[7] 王明年,陈炜韬,刘大刚,童建军. 公路隧道岩质和土质围岩统一亚级分级标准研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 547 -552 .
[8] 周小平,刘庆义. 岩石声发射混沌特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 815 -820 .
[9] 李加贵,陈正汉,黄雪峰,张力邈,姚志华. Q3黄土侧向卸荷时的细观结构演化及强度特性[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1084 -1091 .
[10] 张孟喜,陈高峰,朱 引,李晋杰. H-V加筋饱和砂土性状的三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1345 -1351 .