›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3130-3138.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2913

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂土中筒型基础沉放过程渗流特性和沉贯阻力研究

丁红岩1, 2,贾 楠2, 3,张浦阳1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072; 3. 交通运输部 天津水运工程科学研究院,天津 300456
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-15 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 作者简介:丁红岩,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程及海洋结构方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51779171,No.51679163);国家创新方法工作专项(No.2016IM030100);天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(No.15JCQNJC43900,No.17JCYBJC22000)

Research of seepage characteristics and penetration resistance during installation of bucket foundations in sand

DING Hong-yan1, 2, JIA Nan2, 3, ZHANG Pu-yang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, Tianjin 300456, China
  • Received:2016-12-15 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779171, 51679163), the Innovation Method Fund of China (2016IM030100) and Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (15JCQNJC43900, 17JCYBJC22000).

摘要: 筒型基础的沉放是一项关键施工过程,沉放时土体在施工负压下产生渗流场,而渗流对基础筒壁的侧摩阻力和端阻力产生影响,导致沉贯阻力难以预测。针对这一问题,首先应用试验和数值模拟的方法,对筒型基础沉贯过程中的渗流特性进行分析,揭示筒壁两侧及筒端土体超孔隙水压力的分布;然后将分析结果应用于沉贯阻力的推导中,并对推导的公式进行验证。研究表明:筒型基础沉贯过程中,筒壁两侧土体的超孔隙水压力沿筒壁深度几乎呈线性变化,在接近筒端时出现非线性变化;不同的沉贯深度下,渗流对沉贯阻力的影响不同,随着沉贯深度的增加,减小的阻力占总沉贯阻力的比值越来越大;通过推导的理论公式计算的试验模型和实际工程的沉贯负压理论计算值与实测值吻合较好。

关键词: 筒型基础, 砂土, 渗流特性, 沉贯阻力

Abstract: The penetration of the bucket foundation is a vital construction procedure. Seepage field is generated in the soil under the suction pressure during the penetration. The seepage has an influence on the friction along the skirt wall and on the resistance of the skirt tip, which leads to the difficulty in predicting penetration resistance. In order to solve this problem, firstly, the methods of experiment and numerical simulation were applied to analyze the seepage characteristics of the bucket foundation during the penetration; moreover the distribution of the excess pore water pressure along the bulkhead and skirt tip was revealed. Thereafter, the analytical results were applied to derive the penetration resistance, and the derived theoretical formulae were verified. The results show that during the penetration of the bucket foundation, the excess pore water pressure of the soil changes linearly along the depth of the skirt, but becomes nonlinearly near the skirt tip. The effect of seepage flow on the penetration resistance is different for different penetration depths; the reduced resistance caused by seepage accounts is for a greater proportion of the penetration resistance with increasing penetration depth. The suction pressure of the test model and practical engineering calculated by the theoretical formulae are in good agreement with the measured values.

Key words: bucket foundations, sand, seepage characteristics, penetration resistance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 孙逸飞, 陈 成, . 无状态变量的状态依赖剪胀方程及其本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1813-1822.
[2] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[3] 马文冠, 刘 润, 练继建, 郭绍曾. 粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1307-1312.
[4] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[5] 张 勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平, . 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933-941.
[6] 陆 勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[7] 张成功, 尹振宇, 吴则祥, 金银富, . 颗粒形状对粒状材料圆柱塌落影响的 三维离散元模拟 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1197-1203.
[8] 董建勋, 刘海笑, 李 洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[9] 王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.
[10] 纪文栋,张宇亭,王 洋,裴文斌, . 循环单剪下珊瑚钙质砂和普通硅质砂剪切特性对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 282-288.
[11] 史旦达,杨彦骋,邓益兵,刘文白,. 考虑转速比影响的砂土中螺旋挤扩钻具成孔特性宏细观模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1981-1990.
[12] 柳晓科,鹿 群,路士伟,刘春龙,郭少龙,. 低裙式吸力桩真空沉贯及抗拔极限承载力[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2089-2098.
[13] 付海清,袁晓铭,王 淼,. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
[14] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[15] 刘 笋,蒋明镜,付 昌,朱俊高,. 结构性砂土静力触探试验离散元分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 933-942.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 米海珍,高 春. 生石灰膨胀特性的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1253 -1256 .
[2] 何先龙,赵立珍. 基于多重互相关函数分析剪切波速[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2541 -2545 .
[3] 宋 飞,刘 超,张建民,郑瑞华. 离心模型挡土墙试验设备的研制[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 3005 -3011 .
[4] 孙熙平,张宝华,张 强,王笑难. 重力式码头基床遭水流冲刷后的稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3184 -3190 .
[5] 张春会,赵全胜. 基于ARCGIS的矿山开采沉陷灾害预警系统[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2197 -2202 .
[6] 孙 建 ,王连国 ,唐芙蓉 ,沈义峰 ,龚世龙. 倾斜煤层底板破坏特征的微震监测[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1589 -1595 .
[7] 杨永香 ,周 健 ,贾敏才 ,胡金虎. 饱和砂土液化特性的可视化试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1643 -1648 .
[8] 徐正明,薛 强,赵 颖. 改性污泥复合材料时间效应三轴力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1713 -1718 .
[9] 陈 明 ,胡英国 ,卢文波 ,严 鹏 ,周创兵. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞爆破开挖损伤特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 172 -177 .
[10] 王 涛 ,李 杨 ,周 勇 ,吕 庆 ,刘大炜. 关于磷石膏尾矿库安全专篇的研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 407 -412 .