›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3313-3320.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2956

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于切向应变软化的深埋圆形隧道围岩弹塑性分析

王凤云,钱德玲   

  1. 合肥工业大学 土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-22 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 钱德玲,女,1956年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:dlqian@sina.com E-mail:fengyunwang_sc@sina.com
  • 作者简介:王凤云,女,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道工程数值计算和理论分析等研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然基金资助项目(No.51378168)

Elasto-plastic analysis of a deep circular tunnel based on tangential strain softening

WANG Feng-yun, QIAN De-ling   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • Received:2016-12-22 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (51378168).

摘要: 为了研究深埋圆形隧道围岩的应变软化行为,首先通过引入应变软化度,即软化区与残余区交界面处的切向应变和弹塑性交界面处的切向应变的比值,来表征应变软化程度。其次,推导了求解软化区与残余区位移方程,并将该方法求得的位移曲线与Lee法和Cui法对比,验证了方法的正确性。最后,通过算例分析,研究不同力学模型对塑性区半径的影响,以及应变软化度对塑性区中软化区与残余区比例和位移的影响。结果表明:弹塑性交界面处的围压与软化度和支护力均无关,塑性区半径与支护力有关;软化度直接影响软化区与残余区的比例,随着软化度的增加,软化区范围增加,相应的残余区范围减小;软化区与残余区交界面的位移随着软化度的增加而逐渐增加,应变软化度的增加,支护力对其影响增加;洞壁处的位移受支护力的影响较大,随支护力的增加而减小。

关键词: 围岩, 应变软化度, 塑性区半径, 位移

Abstract: To explore the strain-softening behavior of a deep circular tunnel, the strain softening coefficient is introduced to characterize the degree of strain softening. This coefficient is defined as the ratio of the tangential strain at the boundary of the softening-residual plastic zone to the tangential strain at the boundary of the elasto-softening zone. Then, the displacement equations of the softening plastic zone and the residual plastic zone are deduced. The displacement curves calculated by the deduced method are compared with those calculated by Lee’s method and Cui’s method to verify its accuracy. Finally, using example analysis, the difference of the plastic radius is obtained due to the difference of the selected mechanical model. In addition, the effect of the strain softening coefficient on the ratio of the softening plastic zone to the residual plastic zone and displacement is analyzed. The results show that the confining stress at the elasto-plastic boundary is not related to strain softening coefficient and support force, but the plastic radius is related to the support force. The strain softening coefficient has a direct influence on the ratio of the radius of the residual plastic zone to the radius of the plastic zone. With the increase of strain softening coefficient, the range of softening area increases, leading to the decrease of the residual plastic zone. The displacement surrounding tunnel wall is greatly affected by support force and deceased with the increase of support force.

Key words: rock masses, strain softening coefficient, plastic radius, displacement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 侯公羽,李小瑞,梁洪垚,梁金平,周蒙辉,崔永科,. 高强石膏材料配比研究及其在围岩试件(厚壁圆筒) 开挖卸荷试验中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 159-166.
[2] 谷拴成,周 攀,黄荣宾. 锚杆–围岩承载结构支护下隧洞稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 122-130.
[3] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[4] 孙明社,马 涛,申志军,吴 旭,王梦恕,. 复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[5] 刘成禹,郑智享,. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[6] 王少杰,吕爱钟,张晓莉. 横观各向同性岩体中马蹄形隧洞的位移反分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[7] 刘 聪,李术才,周宗青,李利平,王 康,侯福金, 秦承帅,高成路,. 复杂地层超大断面隧道施工围岩力学特征模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3495-3504.
[8] 周 勇,令永强,杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[9] 孙志亮,孔令伟,郭爱国. 不同含水状态堆积体边坡地震响应特性大型振动台模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2433-2441.
[10] 王观石,熊 鹏,胡世丽,孟世明,龙 平,谭 谈,. 位移不连续模型在黏弹性节理刚度计算的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2175-2183.
[11] 周 勇,王旭日,朱彦鹏,李京榜,蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[12] 谢 涛,罗 强,张 良,连继峰,于曰明, . 主动与被动状态下墙体侧向位移近似计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1682-1690.
[13] 刘成禹,陈淑云,. 基坑围护结构增量计算法的改进[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1834-1839.
[14] 李 亚,李书兆,张 超. 黏土中自升式钻井船插桩对邻近桩基影响的分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1891-1900.
[15] 储召军,石少卿,孙建虎,李 季,崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 田湖南,孔令伟. 细粒对砂土持水能力影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 56 -60 .
[2] 张 敏,吴宏伟. 离心试验中的地下水模拟控制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 355 -360 .
[3] 程永春,葛 琪,何 锋. 季冻区土质边坡滑动界面临界深度的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1042 -1046 .
[4] 李晓红,夏彬伟,李 丹,韩昌瑞. 深埋隧道层状围岩变形特征分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1163 -1167 .
[5] 张孟喜,陈高峰,朱 引,李晋杰. H-V加筋饱和砂土性状的三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1345 -1351 .
[6] 王立峰. 土钉墙面层土压力的计算分析[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1615 -1620 .
[7] 卢 正,姚海林,程 平,吴万平. 非均布列车荷载作用下软土路基的振动分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3286 -3294 .
[8] 卢坤林,朱大勇,许 强,杨 扬. 滑带土抗剪强度参数的三维反分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3319 -3323 .
[9] 刘 辉,杨 峰,阳军生. 空洞上方浅基础地基破坏模式与极限承载力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3373 -3378 .
[10] 张 良,罗 强,陈亚美,裴富营. 桩网结构路基承载特性的现场试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3793 -3800 .