›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 3395-3405.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.3021

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

长壁工作面巷顶沿空掘巷围岩应力分析

王朋飞1,冯国瑞1,赵景礼2,Yoginder P. Chugh 3,王志强2   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 中国矿业大学(北京) 资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083; 3. 美国发明家学会,坦帕 美国
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-31 出版日期:2018-09-11 发布日期:2018-10-08
  • 作者简介:王朋飞,男,1988年生,博士,讲师,主要从事矿山压力、岩石力学等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(No.51422404);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.51404270);国家留学基金委资助项目(No.201506430011)

Investigation of stress of surrounding rock mass of gob-side entry under gob of a longwall panel

WANG Peng-fei1, FENG Guo-rui1, ZHAO Jing-li2, Yoginder P. Chugh 3, WANG Zhi-qiang2   

  1. 1. College of Mining Technology, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 3. National Academy of Inventors, Tampa, USA
  • Received:2016-12-31 Online:2018-09-11 Published:2018-10-08
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Excellent Young Scientists Fund for National Natural Science Foundation of China (51422404), the Young Foundation of National Natural Science of China (51404270) and the Funding Project of China Scholarship Council (201506430011).

摘要: 镇城底矿工作面的回采巷道一条沿顶板掘进,一条沿底板掘进,相邻两工作面在端头搭接,沿底板掘进的巷道形成巷顶沿空掘巷。通过理论分析、相似模拟、数值模拟及现场实测对巷顶沿空掘巷围岩结构及应力环境进行了研究。得到如下结论:该巷道不受超前和固定支承压力影响,大结构下方的矸石垫层可起到能量和应力耗散的作用,避免了动载和冲击影响,应力低且稳定;岩层移动形成的垮落角对采空区应力大小和分布(尤其采空区边缘)有重要影响;垮落角越小,采空区应力越小,该巷道围岩应力越小,采空区恢复至原岩应力的距离越大;垮落角对岩体塑性区发育方向起控制和导向作用;该巷道围岩应力大幅低于原岩应力,卸压程度大;实测该巷道竖向和横向位移均比非沿空巷道小,即顶底板和两帮应力环境均得到改善。研究对维护具有冲击倾向的高应力巷道具有一定意义。

关键词: 错层位, 沿空掘巷, 双屈服, 采空区, 冲击倾向, 高应力

Abstract: The gateroads on the sides of a longwall panel at Zhenchengdi Coal Mine are driven along the roof and floor, respectively, and thus the gateroad along the floor becomes the gob-side entry under a longwall gob. In this paper, theoretical analysis, physical modelling, numerical modelling and field observation are conducted to investigate structures and stress of surrounding rock mass of this gob-side gateroad. It is found that the gob-side entry is independent of the side and front abutment pressures. The caved rock cushion under the masonry beam structure can dissipate energy and stress for the gob-side entry, which prevents from dynamic and impact loads, providing the stable stress environment much lower than pre-mining stress. The angle of break developed due to strata movement has a significant effect on stress and distribution (especially on gob edge). The lower the angle of break is, the smaller the gob pressure and stress are around the entry, and the larger distance between the gob edge to the location where pre-mining pressure occurs. The angle of break has a dictating and guiding function for the plastic zone development. The stress of surrounding rock mass of gob-side entry is significantly lower than premining stress with the high destress degree. Both the roof to floor and rib to rib convergences are smaller than that of non-gob-side entry, which demonstrates that overall stress environment is improved. The study is of certain drawing significance for highly stressed burst-prone gateroads.

Key words: split-level, gob-side gateroad driving, double yield, gob, burst-prone, high stress

中图分类号: 

  • TD 322
[1] 宫凤强, 伍武星, 李天斌, 司雪峰, . 深部硬岩矩形隧洞围岩板裂破坏的试验模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2085-2098.
[2] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[3] 姜立春, 罗恩民, 沈彬彬, . 多自由度模型法的立体采空区群爆破 动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2407-2415.
[4] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
[5] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[6] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[7] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周 钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征 及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[8] 任连伟,周桂林,顿志林,何停印,杨权威,张敏霞,. 采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2922-2932.
[9] 赵金帅,冯夏庭,王鹏飞,江 权,陈炳瑞,周扬一,裴书锋, . 爆破开挖诱发的地下交叉洞室微震特性及破裂机制分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2563-2573.
[10] 谢学斌,邓融宁,董宪久,闫泽正,. 基于突变和流变理论的采空区群系统稳定性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1963-1972.
[11] 赵金帅,冯夏庭,江 权,陈炳瑞,肖亚勋,胡 磊,丰光亮,李鹏翔,. 分幅开挖方式下高应力硬岩地下洞室的微震特性及稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1020-1026.
[12] 司雪峰, 宫凤强,罗 勇,李夕兵, . 深部三维圆形洞室岩爆过程的模拟试验[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[13] 张 强,李小春,胡少斌,牛智勇,汪 芳,范 坤,邵光强,. 高应力下花岗岩耦合节理在剪切过程中渗透率演化特性[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3641-3650.
[14] 钟 山,江 权,冯夏庭,刘继光,李邵军,邱士利,吴世勇,. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[15] 肖晓春,金 晨,赵 鑫,丁 鑫,代连朋,徐 军,. 组合煤岩冲击倾向电荷判据试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1620-1628.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[2] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[3] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[4] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[5] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[6] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[7] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[8] 徐志军,郑俊杰,张 军,马 强. 聚类分析和因子分析在黄土湿陷性评价中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 407 -411 .
[9] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[10] 李 健 ,谭忠盛 ,喻 渝 ,倪鲁肃. 下穿高速公路浅埋大跨度黄土隧道施工措施研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2803 -2809 .