›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3531-3538.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2134

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同堆载形式对群桩负摩阻力的影响

马学宁1,付 江2,王 军1,王 旭1   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 兰州新区现代农业投资集团有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730300
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-25 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 作者简介:马学宁,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事基础工程的教学及科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41562014)

Effect of different surcharge loading forms on negative skin friction of pile groups

MA Xue-ning1, FU Jiang2, WANG Jun1, WANG Xu1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering ,Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Lanzhou New Area Agricultural Investment Group, Lanzhou, Gansu 730300, China
  • Received:2017-10-25 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41562014).

摘要: 在既有桥墩桩基础周围土体堆载时,会引起土体的沉降和侧向变形,进而在桩身产生负摩阻力,对桩基变形及承载性能有很大影响。为研究围载和单侧边载作用下群桩中不同位置桩基的受力差异,以3×3群桩基础为研究对象,进行围载和单侧边载作用下的模型试验,分析了不同位置桩基轴力、侧摩阻力、中性点位置和基桩承载力安全系数等的变化规律及差异。研究结果表明:围载工况下,角桩的轴力、侧摩阻力最大,边桩次之,中心桩最小;中性点位置角桩最深,边桩略高,中心桩距桩顶最近。边载工况下,靠近边载侧和中间一排桩基轴力、侧摩阻力与围载时的变化规律类似,远离边载侧的一排桩基受边载影响较小,无负摩阻力;各桩基中性点位置变化规律类似于围载工况。与围载工况相比,边载时同一位置桩身轴力、负摩阻力均较小,中性点位置较高。与单侧边载工况相比,围载时各基桩承载力安全系数FS均较小且随荷载的增大衰减梯度较大。该研究成果为不同堆载形式下群桩基础的设计提供参考。

关键词: 围载, 边载, 群桩, 负摩阻力, 中性点, 模型试验

Abstract: When a load is applied on soil around the pile group foundation of the existing bridge pier, it can result in the settlement and lateral deformation of soil and negative skin friction, which would have a great influence on the deformation and bearing capacity of the piles. To investigate the stress difference among piles at different locations under one-side load and surrounding load, model tests of 3×3 pile group foundation were performed to determine the change rules and the differences of axial force, negative skin friction, neutral point position, and safety factors of bearing capacity of piles among different piles. The results show that under the surrounding load, the axial force and skin friction values of the piles at the corner of pile group reach the maximum, those of side piles are the second, and those of the pile in the centre reach the minimum. In addition, the neutral points of the piles in the corner locate at the deepest, those of the side piles locate slightly higher, and those of the pile in the centre are closest to the pile tops. Under one-side load, the axial force and skin friction of the piles in the row near the side load and in the middle row change similarly to those under the surrounding load, and piles in the row far away from the side load are less affected by the load, and there is no negative skin friction acting on the piles. The change rule of the neutral point position in each pile is also similar to that under the surrounding load. Under the side load, the axial force, negative skin friction of the piles at the same location are smaller, but the neutral point position is higher than those under the surrounding load. The safety factor FS of bearing capacity of each pile under the surrounding load condition is less and decreases faster than that under the one-side load condition. This study could provide references for design of pile-group foundation under different loading modes.

Key words: surrounding load, side load, pile group, negative skin friction, neutral point, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 范怡飞, 王建华, . 考虑桩靴贯入对邻近群桩效应影响的分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2360-2368.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[7] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[8] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[9] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[10] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[11] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[12] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[13] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[14] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[15] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!