›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3539-3547.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0191

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究

王家全,张亮亮,刘政权,周圆兀   

  1. 广西科技大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 柳州 545006
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-25 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 作者简介:王家全,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事加筋结构、细观岩土力学、地基基础等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51469005);广西自然科学基金项目(No. 2015GXNSFAA139257,No. 2015GXNSFAA139270,No. 2017GXNSFAA198170);广西科技大学研究生教育创新计划项目(No. GKYC201627)。

Large model test on geogrid reinforced sand soil foundation under dynamic loading

WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LIU Zheng-quan, ZHOU Yuan-wu   

  1. College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
  • Received:2017-03-25 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51469005), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province of China (2015GXNSFAA139257, 2015GXNSFAA139270, 2017GXNSFAA198170) and the Graduate Student Education Innovation Projects of GXUST (GKYC201627).

摘要: 为了研究土工格栅加筋砂土地基在动力荷载作用下的受力变形特性,利用自行设计的300 cm×160 cm×200 cm(长×宽×高)大比例地基模型试验装置,分别针对纯砂地基、土工格栅加筋地基进行了静动荷载破坏试验。分析地基承载力及基础沉降、地基土压力、动力加速度响应、土工格栅应变等参数变化规律,揭示了动力荷载作用下加筋砂土地基的承载力和变形特征,并对比分析静、动荷载对加筋地基承载性能的影响。试验结果表明,与纯砂地基相比,格栅单层加筋地基的承载力提高1.12倍,地基基础中轴线处沉降量减少24%,加筋土体的抗变形能力得到很大提高;加筋作用改变了地基的破坏模式,动载作用下纯砂地基为冲剪破坏而加筋地基为整体剪切破坏;筋材的存在对地基土压力及加速度峰值分别有明显的扩散作用和衰减作用,可有效降低在动力载荷下筋土的瞬态变形。

关键词: 土工格栅, 加筋地基, 界面作用, 承载特性, 动载试验

Abstract: To investigate the bearing performance and deformation characteristics of geogrid-reinforced sand soil foundation under the action of dynamic loading, the static and dynamic load failure tests on the pure-sand foundation and geogrid-reinforced foundation were carried by using a self-designed large scale foundation model test device of 300 cm (length)×160 cm (width)×200 cm (height). The variation laws of foundation bearing capacity, foundation settlement, foundation soil pressure, dynamic acceleration response and geogrid strain were analyzed. The bearing capacity and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand foundation under dynamic load were revealed, and the influence of static and dynamic loads on the bearing capacity of reinforced foundation was compared and analyzed. The results showed that the bearing capacity of the monolayer reinforced foundation was improved by 1.12 times as compared with the pure-sand foundation, and the axis settlement of the foundation was reduced by 24%. Moreover, the anti-deformation ability of reinforced-foundation soil was significantly improved compared with pure-sand foundation. The reinforcement changed the failure mode of the foundation, the failure mode of pure-sand foundation was the punching-shear failure, whereas reinforced foundation was whole shear failure under dynamic loading. The existence of the reinforcement had obvious diffusion and attenuation effect on earth pressure and the acceleration peak respectively, which could effectively reduce the transient deformation of the reinforced-soil under dynamic loading.

Key words: geogrid, reinforced foundation, interface interaction, bearing characteristic, dynamic loading test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[2] 杨济铭, 张小勇, 张福友, 曾超峰, 梅国雄, . 砂土中桩-土-承台协同作用下桩基 承载特性细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[3] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[4] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[5] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[6] 江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[7] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[8] 王家全, 张亮亮, 赖 毅, 陆梦梁, 叶 斌, . 加筋土挡墙静动力学特性大模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[9] 刘方成, 吴孟桃, 杨 峻, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶砂强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[10] 王家全, 徐良杰, 黄世斌, 刘政权. 动载下土工格栅加筋桥台挡墙承载性能分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
[11] 雷华阳, 刘广学, 周 骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[12] 王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[13] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[14] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[15] 肖 忠,王 琰,王元战,刘 莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!