›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3603-3611.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2277

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定

肖 忠1, 2,王 琰1, 2,王元战1, 2,刘 莺1, 2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 水利工程仿真与安全国家重点实验室,天津 300072;2. 天津大学 天津市港口与海洋工程重点试验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-15 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 作者简介:肖忠,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事港口海岸和海洋工程结构设计理论、土与结构相互作用方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51479133,No. 51879187,No. 51109157);天津大学“北洋学者?青年骨干教师计划”项目(No. 2017XRG-0040)

Effect of bucket separation distance on bearing capacity of tetrapod bucket foundations and determination of optimal separation distance

XIAO Zhong1, 2, WANG Yan1, 2, WANG Yuan-zhan1, 2, LIU Ying1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Harbor and Ocean Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2017-11-15 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479133, 51879187, 51109157) and the “Elite Scholar Program” of Tianjin University (2017XRG-0040).

摘要: 四桶吸力式基础由4个按正方形排列的吸力式桶形基础组成,并通过上部结构连成整体共同承受外部荷载,相比于单桶基础,四桶基础能承受更恶劣的海洋环境荷载,可作为海上风机和海洋平台等结构物的基础,具有广阔的应用前景。为探究饱和软土地基上四桶基础和单桶基础在承载力以及破坏模式方面的关系,优化四桶基础的设计,建立了大量的四桶和单桶基础的三维有限元模型,系统研究了不同基础埋深和土体剪切强度时桶间距对四桶基础各单向承载能力和对应的破坏模式的影响。结果表明,竖向承载力系数受桶间距影响较小,而水平承载力系数受其影响较大,力矩承载力系数受其影响尤为显著;在同一桶间距比时,四桶吸力式基础的各单向承载力系数随基础埋深比的增加逐渐增大,随土体剪切强度不均匀度指标的增大逐渐减小。通过分析四桶基础的各单向承载力、对应的破坏模式和群效应系数,定义了四桶基础的最优桶间距,可为四桶基础桶间距的优化设计提供依据。

关键词: 四桶吸力式基础, 最优桶间距, 承载特性, 破坏模式, 软土地基

Abstract: Tetrapod bucket foundations are formed by four suction buckets into a square shape and connected by superstructure into a whole to provide better resistances against severe marine environmental loads than single bucket foundation. Tetrapod bucket foundations can serve as foundations for offshore platforms or wind turbines, and show a broad application prospect. To investigate the bearing capacities and failure mode for single and tetrapod bucket foundations, and optimizing the design of tetrapod bucket foundations, this paper established a large number of 3D finite element models of tetrapod bucket foundations in soft soil and systematically investigated the effects of bucket separation distance on uniaxial capacities and corresponding failure modes with different foundation embedment depths and soil strength heterogeneities. Results indicate that vertical capacity factors are almost independent on the bucket separation distance while horizontal capacity factors are evidently dependent on separation distance, and moment capacity factors are especially affected by separation distance. All uniaxial capacity factors of tetrapod bucket foundations increase as embedment depth increases, but decrease as soil heterogeneity index increases under the same bucket separation distance ratio. By analyzing uniaxial capacities, corresponding failure mechanisms and group effect factors of tetrapod bucket foundations, optimal bucket separation distance of tetrapod bucket foundations was defined, which can provide reference for optimizing the design of bucket separation distance of tetrapod bucket foundations.

Key words: tetrapod bucket foundations, optimal separation distance, bearing capacity, failure mechanism, soft soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 杨济铭, 张小勇, 张福友, 曾超峰, 梅国雄, . 砂土中桩-土-承台协同作用下桩基 承载特性细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[7] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[8] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[9] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[10] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[11] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[12] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[13] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[14] 江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[15] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!