›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 3717-3726.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0199

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下高堆尾矿坝永久变形与稳定性分析

尹光志1, 2,王文松1, 2,魏作安1, 2,曹冠森1, 2,张千贵3,敬小非4   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400030;2. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400030; 3. 西南石油大学 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610500;4. 重庆科技学院 安全工程学院,重庆 401331
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-22 出版日期:2018-10-11 发布日期:2018-11-04
  • 通讯作者: 王文松,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事尾矿库安全与岩土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: sdgxwws@163.com E-mail: gzyin@cqu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:尹光志,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿业工程与岩土力学方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2017YFC0804609);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51304170,No. 51404049)。

Analysis of the permanent deformation and stability of high tailings dam under earthquake action

YIN Guang-zhi1, 2, WANG Wen-song1, 2, WEI Zuo-an1, 2, CAO Guan-sen1, 2, ZHANG Qian-gui3, JING Xiao-fei4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Pond Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China; 4. College of Safety Engineering, Chongqing University of Science & Technology, Chongqing 401331, China
  • Received:2017-06-22 Online:2018-10-11 Published:2018-11-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0804609) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51304170, 51404049).

摘要: 综合采用时程分析法、整体变形分析法(等效节点力法和软化模量法)、极限平衡法等方法,以小打鹅尾矿库为例,分析了该高堆尾矿坝的永久变形和动力稳定性。分析了干滩面长度、尾矿堆积坝高度、设计地震加速度等影响因素对尾矿坝的安全系数和永久变形的影响,以及地震作用下尾矿坝安全系数的时程变化规律。结果表明:尾矿坝的地震永久变形与一般土石坝的存在差异,其水平方向的永久变形大于竖直方向的永久变形,且永久变形与坝高不一定呈单调递增关系;地震中尾矿坝的最小安全系数与各影响因素大体呈线性关系,而坝顶处的震陷与各影响因素之间呈非线性关系;地震过程中尾矿坝瞬时安全系数具有波动降低的特点,为此,完善了地震作用下尾矿坝最小平均安全系数的计算方法。该研究表明小打鹅尾矿库坝体的抗震性能能够满足相应抗震设防要求。

关键词: 高堆尾矿坝, 动力稳定性, 永久变形, 安全系数, 等效节点力法, 软化模量法

Abstract: The permanent deformation and dynamic stability of high tailings dam are analyzed by using time-history analysis method, global deformation analysis method (equivalent nodal force method and modulus soften method) and limit equilibrium method with Xiaodae tailings pond as an example. This paper analyzes the influence of length of dry beach, height of tailings dam and seismic acceleration on the safety factor and permanent deformation of tailings dams, and analyzes the time-history change laws of safety factors of tailings dams. It is found that the permanent deformation of the tailings dam is different from that of the general earth-rock dam. The permanent deformation in the horizontal direction of the tailings embankment is greater than that in the vertical direction, and the permanent deformation is not monotonous with the dam height. The minimum safety factor of the tailings dam in the earthquake is linearly related to the influencing factors, and the seismic subsidence at the crest has a nonlinear relationship with the influencing factors. The calculation methods of the minimum average safety factor for seismic safety are improved based on the characteristics of the fluctuation and reduction of the transient safety factors in the earthquake. The results show that the seismic performance of the tailings dam of Xiaodae tailings pond can meet the requirements of the corresponding seismic fortification.

Key words: high tailings dam, dynamic stability, permanent deformation, safety factor, equivalent nodal force method, modulus soften method

中图分类号: 

  • TD 926
[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[4] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[5] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[6] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[7] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[8] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[9] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[10] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[11] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[12] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[13] 李清川,李术才,王汉鹏,张红军,张 冰,张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[14] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[15] 温树杰,梁 超,宋亮亮,刘 刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!