岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 37-44.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1798

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三维边坡整体主滑方向的确定

刘素锦1, 2,郭明伟1, 3,李春光1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室, 湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-23 出版日期:2018-12-21 发布日期:2019-01-02
  • 作者简介:刘素锦,女,1982年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性分析等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    三峡大学三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室开放研究基金项目(2018KDZ02);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51674239)。

Determination of main sliding direction for three-dimensional slope

LIU Su-jin1, 2, GUO Ming-wei1, 3, LI Chun-guang1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2018-09-23 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Funds Research Project of Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area(China Three Gorges University), Ministry of Education(2018KDZ02) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51674239).

摘要: 边坡主滑方向直接关系到边坡整体稳定性及边坡加固中的下滑推力计算,目前边(滑)坡主滑方向主要根据经验半经验的方法确定,如坡体内监测点位移整体矢量方向、平行于坡体底滑面或依据坡体滑动失稳机制进行相应的假设等,对于复杂边坡体则很难给出准确的主滑方向。基于最小势能原理,在坡体当前应力的基础上推导出二维和三维边坡主滑方向的理论公式,简单滑块算例和三维边坡算例验证了文中方法的合理性。除计算坡体主滑方向外,该公式还可计算沿滑移路径的主滑方向曲线,为坡体稳定性分析及剩余下滑推力计算提供更为准确的理论支持。

关键词: 主滑方向, 最小势能原理, 边坡稳定

Abstract: The main sliding direction is directly related to the slope stability evaluation and the determination of residual thrust force. At present, the sliding direction of the slope is mainly determined with semiempirical or empirical approach, such as whole vector direction of the displacements monitored inside the slope, parallel to the bottom of potential slip surface or the hypothesis made based on the failure mechanism of the slope. According to the principle of minimum potential energy, 2-D and 3-D sliding direction are rigorously deduced on the basis of current stress state of the slope. Moreover, this theoretical solution is verified to be rational by simple sliding block placed on an inclined plane and 3D slope examples. Besides, the curve of the sliding direction angle along the slip surface is also determined, which accurately supplies theoretical foundation to slope stability problem and the determination of residual thrust force.

Key words: main sliding direction, principle of minimum potential energy, slope stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[2] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[3] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[4] 韩同春, 林博文, 何露, 苏钰钦, . 基于GIS与数值模拟软件耦合的 三维边坡建模方法及其稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2855-2865.
[5] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[6] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[7] 夏侯云山, 张抒, 唐辉明, 刘晓, 吴琼, . 考虑参数空间变异结构的结构化交叉约束 随机场模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4935-4945.
[8] 刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
[9] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[10] 代仲海,胡再强,尹小涛,吴振君,. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[11] 秦雨樵,汤 华,冯振洋,尹小涛,王东英, . 基于聚类分析的边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
[12] 温树杰,梁 超,宋亮亮,刘 刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
[13] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[14] 吴震宇,陈建康. 土坡体系可靠度分析方法及在高土石坝工程中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 699-704.
[15] 郑 刚,于晓旋,杜 娟,尹 鑫,周海祚,杨新煜, . 临近边坡的条形基础地基极限承载力数值分析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3812-3820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!