岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 123-130.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1024

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩石节理峰值抗剪强度新模型

陈 曦,曾亚武,孙翰卿,任树林,刘 伟   

  1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-12 出版日期:2018-12-21 发布日期:2019-01-03
  • 通讯作者: 曾亚武,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学等方面的研究及教学工作。E-mail: zengyw@whu.edu.cn E-mail:1780164218@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈曦,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石节理剪切力学特性、工程岩体分级等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41772308)

A new peak shear strength model of rock joints

CHEN Xi, ZENG Ya-wu, SUN Han-qing, REN Shu-lin, LIU Wei   

  1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2018-06-12 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41772308).

摘要: Grasselli提出的形貌参数充分反映了节理表面粗糙度的三维特征,Xia模型、Yang模型、Tang模型采用Grasselli提出的三维形貌参数,但Xia模型峰值抗剪强度公式不满足边界条件,Yang模型材料项不能反映节理剪切受拉破坏机制,Tang模型预测精度较低且剪胀角与法向应力关系未能体现粗糙度参数的作用,文中提出一个新的峰值抗剪强度公式弥补了上述各模型的不足之处。根据Grasselli、唐志成等、Yang等发表的63组数据对新模型进行验算,结果表明,Tang模型预测精度较低,新模型和Xia模型、Grasselli模型预测精度较为接近。此外发现,关系函数f(?n)考虑形貌参数的作用时可以有效地提高模型的预测精度。新模型公式形式较为简洁、物理意义明确、符合摩尔-库仑准则、量纲统一,可以为相关的工程研究提供参考。

关键词: 岩石节理, 峰值抗剪强度模型, Grasselli模型

Abstract: The morphology parameters proposed by Grasselli fully described the three-dimensional roughness of rock joints. Based on Grasselli’s three-dimensional parameters, Xia et al, Yang et al, and Tang et al developed new peak shear strength models. It is revealed that Xia’s model didn’t agree well with the boundary conditions. Yang’s model can not explain the mechanism of tensile failure during the shearing of rock joints. Tang’s model showed a low accuracy in predicting the peak shear strength of a rock joint. In light of these problems, a new peak shear strength model is established. The new model is verified based on the 63 groups of rock joints published by Grasselli, Tang and Yang, the results show that the new model has the same accuracy with the published model, and the new model is simple in terms of form so it can provide a reference for rock engineering. Besides, it will improve the accuracy in predicting the peak shear strength between the calculated results and the test results when the relationship function f(?n) takes the morphological parameter into consideration.

Key words: rock joints, peak shear strength model, Grasselli’s model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 翟明磊,郭保华,李冰洋,焦 峰,. 岩石节理分级剪切加载-蠕变-卸载的能量与变形特征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2865-2872.
[2] 王 刚 ,黄 娜 ,蒋宇静 ,李 博 ,吴学震 ,张学朋,. 一种新型粗糙节理面随机强度模型及其应用[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 497-503.
[3] 唐志成 ,刘泉声 ,夏才初 ,吴月秀 ,黄继辉 ,王春波,. 确定岩石节理Maksimovic峰值抗剪强度准则中“粗糙度角??”的新方法[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 551-555.
[4] 史 玲 ,蔡美峰. 岩石节理在固定法向压力刚度条件下的剪切理论研究[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 739-744.
[5] 王 刚,蒋宇静,王渭明,李廷春. 新型数控岩石节理剪切渗流试验台的设计与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3200-3209.
[6] 陈益峰,周创兵,盛永清. 考虑峰后力学特性的岩石节理渗流广义立方定理[J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1825-1831.
[7] 周枝华,杜守继. 岩石节理表面几何特性的三维统计分析[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1227-1232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!