天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1282

岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 285-294.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1282

天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究

郑刚^{1, 2}，栗晴瀚^{1, 2}，哈达^{1, 2}，程雪松^{1, 2}

1. 天津大学滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室，天津 300072；2. 天津大学建筑工程学院，天津 300072

收稿日期:2018-07-15 出版日期:2018-12-21 发布日期:2019-01-06
通讯作者: 哈达，男，1990年生，博士研究生，从事土力学及岩土工程的研究工作。E-mail: 18647390538@163.com E-mail:zhenggang1967@163.com
作者简介:郑刚，男，1967年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，从事土力学及岩土工程的教学与科研工作。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（No.2017YFC0805407）；国家自然科学基金（No.51508382，No.41630641）。

Study of stress state and settlement induced by pressure relief of confined aquifers in Tianjin

ZHENG Gang^{1, 2}, LI Qing-han^{1, 2}, HA Da^{1, 2}, CHENG Xue-song^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structures and Safety of Ministry of Education Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2018-07-15 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-06
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFC0805407) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508382, 41630641).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基坑工程中坑内承压水降水引发的坑外土体沉降与含水层土体性质及应力状态密切相关，但在天津地区承压含水层的土体应力状态及其沉降变形规律均缺乏系统地研究。首先通过天津市第一、二含水层组的历史水位变化，分析各含水层组土体的应力状态。再结合2组现场抽水试验，分析了各承压层降水-恢复过程土体沉降变形规律。根据对历史数据的分析表明，受补给关系和自然条件影响，天津市第一含水层组中上部水位变化较小，处于正常固结和轻度超固结状态。而20世纪60～80年代天津市深层地下水由于大规模开采形成了以市区为中心的降深漏斗，造成了严重的地表沉降。80年代后限制开采，天津市区的地下水位得以部分恢复，导致第一含水层组底部和第二含水层组处于严重的超固结状态。抽水试验结果表明，基本处于正常固结状态的第一承压层在抽水-恢复过程中变形以塑性变形为主，处于超固结状态的第二承压层变形以弹性变形为主，在反复降水-恢复中仍然会产生一定量的塑性变形，即当水位恢复时承压层压缩变形并不能完全恢复；受“土拱”作用影响，承压含水层降水引发的土体沉降最大值并不位于地表，而是位于抽水含水层上覆弱透水层附近。

关键词: 历史地下水位, 基坑降水, 超固结, 塑性变形

Abstract: In the excavation engineering, the soil settlement outside the excavation caused by pressure reduction in the excavation is closely related to the soil properties and stress state of the aquifer. However, the soil state and the settlement regularity of confined aquifers in Tianjin still lack of systematic research. Firstly, the stress states of the soils in the first and second aquifer groups of Tianjin are analyzed through the historical groundwater level changes. On this basis, combined with two groups of field pumping tests, the settlement and deformation laws of confined aquifers in the process of dewatering and recovery are analyzed. According to the analysis of historical data, the upper part of the first aquifer group in Tianjin is in the normal consolidation and light over-consolidated state affected by recharge and natural conditions. However due to the over-exploitation from 1960s to 1980s, the drawdown cone centered on the urban area was formed in deep aquifers of Tianjin, which caused serious surface subsidence. Now the groundwater level has been partially recovered due to the limitation of exploitation from 1980s. Therefore, the bottom of the first aquifer group and the second aquifer group are seriously over-consolidated. Based on the analysis of the pumping test results, the results show that the deformation of the first confined aquifer in the normal consolidation state is mainly plastic deformation during the pumping-recovery process, while the second confined aquifer in the over-consolidated state is mainly elastic deformation; and the plastic deformation will still occur in the cycle pumping-recovery process. When the groundwater level was recovered, the settlement of the soil cannot be fully recovered. Meanwhile, affected by “soil arching”, the location of the maximum settlement caused by the aquifer pumping was not on the ground surface, but near the aquitard over the pumping aquifer.

Key words: historical groundwater level, foundation pit dewatering, over-consolidation, plastic deformation

中图分类号:

TU 473

郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.

ZHENG Gang, LI Qing-han, HA Da, CHENG Xue-song, . Study of stress state and settlement induced by pressure relief of confined aquifers in Tianjin[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[2]	王秋生, 周济兵. 基于广义热力学的超固结土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4178-4184.
[3]	孙凯，陈正林，路德春，. 一种考虑黏聚强度的改良土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1589-1597.
[4]	杨吉龙，袁海帆，胡云壮，胥勤勉，施佩歆，陈永胜,. 天津滨海地区深部黏土层弹塑性变形特征与地面沉降关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3763-3772.
[5]	杨光昌，白冰. 考虑超固结效应的不同温度路径下饱和粉质黏土的热固结[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 71-77.
[6]	刘超，黄滚，赵宏刚，宋真龙，张驰，俞欢, . 复杂应力路径下原煤力学与渗透特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 191-198.
[7]	纠永志，祝彦知，. 开挖条件下非均质地基中单桩竖向承载特性非线性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1666-1674.
[8]	纠永志，黄茂松, . 超固结软黏土的静止土压力系数与不排水抗剪强度[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 951-957.
[9]	庄超，周志芳，李兆峰，郭巧娜. 一种确定超固结弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 61-66.
[10]	李传勋，徐超，谢康和，. 考虑非达西渗流和应力历史的土体非线性固结研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 91-100.
[11]	王其虎，叶义成，刘艳章，姚囝, . 考虑初始损伤和蠕变损伤的岩石蠕变全过程本构模型[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 57-62.
[12]	李林，李镜培，岳著文，唐剑华, . 饱和黏土中钻孔灌注桩孔壁稳定性力学机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2496-2504.
[13]	于亚磊，叶冠林，熊永林，. 上海第4层黏土力学特性的弹塑性本构模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2541-2546.
[14]	梁书秀，孙昭晨，张卫平，王兴刚，. 桩柱结构在地震作用下非线性响应研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1259-1267.
[15]	王智超，金刚，吴晓峰，邓旭华，董辉，. 非饱和压实土率相关变形特征与时效模型[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 719-727.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究

Study of stress state and settlement induced by pressure relief of confined aquifers in Tianjin

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0