岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 951-961.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1807

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究

魏少伟1, 2,隋颜阳3,杨建民3, 4   

  1. 1. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 铁道建筑研究所,北京 100081;2. 北京铁科特种工程技术有限公司,北京 100081; 3. 天津大学 土木工程系,天津 300072;4. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-31 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 作者简介:魏少伟,男,1984年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    广东交通科技项目(No.2012-01-001-05)

Model tests on anti-sliding mechanism of circular and rectangular cross section anti-sliding piles

WEI Shao-wei1, 2, SUI Yan-yang3, YANG Jian-min3, 4   

  1. 1. Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Beijing Tieke Special Engineering Technology Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety, Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2017-08-31 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Guangdong Transportation Science and Technology Project(2012-01-001-05).

摘要: 在滑坡治理与边坡防护工程中,圆形截面抗滑桩由于具有便于机械化成桩的施工优势,已被工程广泛应用。然而,与传统的矩形抗滑桩相比,目前对于圆形截面抗滑桩的研究较少,设计和理论体系不够完善,其抗滑效果尚无统一定论。基于圆形截面与矩形截面抗滑桩对比模型试验研究圆形截面与矩形截面抗滑桩的受力变形特征,比较两者的抗滑能力:在满足各试验相似关系的前提下,分别进行无桩空推试验、圆形截面抗滑桩试验和矩形截面抗滑桩试验。观察土体与模型桩受力发生变形的全过程,并对试验结果进行比较。布设土压力盒、钢筋计及百分表,对土压力、钢筋应力、桩顶位移进行监测,分析模型桩的受力特性。研究结果表明,相同条件下圆形截面抗滑桩的受力性能与矩形截面抗滑桩基本一致,受力过程中传力均匀,对桩底嵌固端强度要求低,具有良好的抗滑承载能力,值得在工程实际中推广应用。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 圆形截面, 模型试验

Abstract: In the landslide control and slope protection project, the circular cross-section anti-sliding pile has been widely used in geotechnical engineering practice because of its advantages of mechanized pile construction. However, compared with the traditional rectangular cross-section anti-sliding pile, there is less research on the circular cross-section anti-sliding pile, and the design and theoretical systems are not perfect enough. There is no unified conclusion on anti-sliding effect yet. In this study, the model experiments were conduct to investigate the force and deformation characteristics of circular section and rectangular section anti-slide piles, comparing their anti-slide abilities. On the premise of satisfying the similarity relation of each test, the pile-free push test, circular section anti-sliding piles test and rectangular section anti-sliding piles test were carried out respectively to observe the whole process of the deformation of soil and model piles. The experimental results were compared. Eearth pressure cells, reinforcement stress gauges, and dial indicators were arranged to monitor the earth pressure, reinforcement stress and displacement of pile top. The mechanical characteristics of the model pile were analyzed. The performance of circular cross-section anti-sliding piles is basically the same as that of rectangular cross-section anti-sliding piles under the same conditions. The force transfer is uniform in the process of loading, the requirement for the strength of the fixed end of the pile is low, and the anti-sliding bearing capacity is good. It is worth popularizing and applying in engineering practice.

Key words: anti-slide pile, circular section, model test

中图分类号: 

  • U213.1+52.1
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!