岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1005-1012.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1706

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究

江强强1, 2,刘路路3,焦玉勇1, 4,王 浩1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 山东省城乡建设勘察设计研究院,济南 山东 250031;4. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-15 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 通讯作者: 焦玉勇,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: yyjiao@cug.edu.cn E-mail:jiangqiangqiang123@126.com
  • 作者简介:江强强,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体力学特性及失稳机制的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51509243);国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(No.2011CB710602)

Strength properties and microstructure characteristics of slip zone soil subjected to wetting-drying cycles

JIANG Qiang-qiang1, 2, LIU Lu-lu3, JIAO Yu-yong1, 4, WANG Hao1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Shandong Institute of Urban and Rural Construction Investigation, Jinan, Shandong, 250031, China; 4. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2017-08-15 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509243) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB710602).

摘要: 库区水位周期性波动,巨大的水位变幅使库岸滑坡滑带土处于干湿循环变化之中,而干湿循环作用影响土体的强度特性。基于此,以三峡库区某典型库岸滑坡滑带土体作为研究对象,对经历不同干湿循环次数的土样进行环剪试验、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)试验和核磁共振(NMR)试验,分析干湿循环作用下滑带土强度特性和微观结构变化规律,并初步探讨干湿循环对滑带土强度影响的微观机制。试验结果表明:干湿循环作用下,滑带土残余强度的劣化特性十分明显,且前3次干湿循环导致土体强度衰减幅度较大,之后衰减趋势减弱,土体强度逐渐趋于稳定,同时,黏聚力的劣化效应大于内摩擦角;随干湿循环次数的增加,以叠聚状、凝块状为主的团粒逐渐分散、解体,颗粒间连接由面?面接触逐渐向面?边、面?角接触演化,表现为土体内孔隙数量增多,土颗粒形态变化,粒间距离增加,微小孔隙逐渐向大孔隙演变;干湿循环作用下,滑带土内亲水性黏土矿物吸水膨胀、失水收缩而引发土颗粒、孔隙及胶结物等微结构变化是导致滑带土残余强度劣化的内在原因。

关键词: 滑带土, 干湿循环, 残余强度, 微观结构, 电镜扫描, 核磁共振

Abstract: Large hydro-fluctuation and periodical water level changes in the reservoir have caused the slip zone soil of the banks to experience drying-wetting cycles, which has a great influence on strength characteristics of soil. In this paper, a series of drying-wetting cycle tests on the slip zone soil from an ancient landslide is carried out. The soil samples after different runs of drying-wetting tests are then used to conduct the ring shear tests, scanning electron microscope (SEM) tests and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tests. The results of these tests can be used to analyze the changes of soil microstructure and strength properties during drying-wetting cycles, and to investigate the microscopic mechanism of changes in strength properties. The research indicates that the deterioration of the residual strength of soil is obvious in drying-wetting cycles. The first three drying-wetting cycles result in a larger attenuation of soil strength, then the decay trend weakens and the soil strength gradually stabilizes. At the same time, the deterioration effect of cohesion is greater than the internal friction angle. Besides, the results also show that the clump-like aggregates are gradually disintegrated with the increase of drying-wetting cycles, and the way of connection of soil particles changes from plane-plane to plane-edge and plane-angle. Meanwhile, under the drying-wetting cycles, the number of pores in the soil increases, the morphology of the soil changes, the distance between the grains increases, and the small pores gradually change to the large pores in soil. The pore and cement microstructure changes of soil particles caused by clay mineral swelling and shrinkage are the causes of deterioration of the residual strength of slip soil under the drying-wetting cycles.

Key words: the slip zone soil, drying-wetting cycles, residual shear strength, microstructure, SEM, NMR

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441
[1] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[2] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[3] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[4] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[5] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[6] 杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征 核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[7] 刘华, 何江涛, 赵茜, 王铁行, 郭超翊, . 酸污染原状黄土渗透微观特征演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 765-772.
[8] 张宗堂, 高文华, 张志敏, 唐骁宇, 邬俊, . 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩颗粒崩解破碎演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 877-885.
[9] 孟祥传, 周家作, 韦昌富, 张坤, 沈正艳, 杨周洁, . 盐分对土的冻结温度及未冻水含量的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 952-960.
[10] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, . 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 561-570.
[11] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[12] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[13] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[14] 李杰林, 朱龙胤, 周科平, 刘汉文, 曹善鹏, . 冻融作用下砂岩孔隙结构损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3524-3532.
[15] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!