岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1113-1120.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2270

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析

谭国宏,肖海珠,杜 勋,胡文军   

  1. 中铁大桥勘测设计院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430056
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 作者简介:谭国宏,男,1979年生,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事桥梁工程设计工作

Settlement analysis of caisson foundation under main tower of a long span cable-stayed bridge for highway and railway

TAN Guo-hong, XIAO Hai-zhu, DU Xun, HU Wen-jun   

  1. China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China
  • Received:2018-12-17 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04

摘要: 高速铁路桥梁基础整体沉降对桥梁线型控制至关重要,而规范中计算整体沉降的分层总和法在深大沉井基础中的适用性有待商榷。以大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥深大沉井基础为工程背景,分别采用摩尔?库仑模型(M-C)、土体硬化模型(HS)和小应变土体硬化(HSS)模型,通过有限元方法,得到了相应的基础沉降曲线。与现场监测数据对比表明,采用HSS模型得到的计算结果与实测值吻合较好。在此基础上,对后续重要施工阶段的沉降趋势进行了合理的预测。与此同时,针对该工程的深大沉井基础,对现有规范分层总和法中的沉降经验系数进行了修正,在该工程中,建议将沉降系数修正为0.13。

关键词: 大跨度斜拉桥, 沉井基础, 基础沉降, 小应变土体硬化模型(HSS), 分层总和法

Abstract: It is vital to foreknow the overall settlement of bridge foundation for high speed railway in order to keep control of the bridge line. However, it is questionable to calculate the overall settlement of the large caisson foundation at a great depth by using layer-wise summation method recommended in the specification. In this paper, a deep and large caisson foundation under main tower of a long span cable-stayed bridge is taken into account. The overall settlement of caisson foundation is calculated by finite element method (FEM) with Mohr-Coulomb model (M-C), hardening-soil model (HS) and small-strain hardening soil model (HSS), respectively. Compared with the field monitoring data, the numerical results show that the overall settlements with HSS model are in good agreement with the monitoring data. Furthermore, the settlements in the following construction stages are rationally predicted by FEM. For layer-wise summation method recommended in the specification, the empirical settlement coefficient is corrected based on the monitoring data, and it is found that when the empirical settlement coefficient is equal to 0.13, the settlements by summation method are consistent with the monitoring data in this case.

Key words: long span cable-stayed bridge, caisson foundation, foundation settlement, small-strain hardening soil model (HSS), layer-wise summation method

中图分类号: 

  • TU470
[1] 蒋炳楠, 马建林, 褚晶磊, 李孟豪, 李军堂, 徐 力, . 水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1551-1560.
[2] 齐昌广 ,范高飞 ,崔允亮 ,张 强,. 利用人工合成透明土的岩土物理模拟试验[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3157-3163.
[3] 杨建民 ,李 嘉,. 基坑底分层回弹量的实用计算方法[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1413-1420.
[4] 董 城 ,冷伍明 ,李志勇 ,邹静蓉,. 重复荷载作用下粉性路基土累积塑性变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3437-3442.
[5] 杨泽飞,魏 纲,林磊磊,张世民. 盾构法隧道施工工后横向地表总沉降研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 338-343.
[6] 王洪新 . 考虑三维变形的柔性和刚性基础沉降计算方法[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1874-1880.
[7] 童立元 ,涂启柱 ,刘松玉 ,杜广印. 基于孔压静力触探测试的改进分层总和法在软基沉降预测中的应用研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 679-682.
[8] 杨光华,王俊辉. 地基非线性沉降计算原状土切线模量法的推广和应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 33-37.
[9] 罗 浩,马建林,周洪燕,周 斌,李 峰. 沉降曲线预测方法-变形过程指数法[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 374-376.
[10] 罗红明,唐辉明,晏鄂川. 武汉阳逻电厂烟囱基础沉降预测研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 844-848.
[11] 刘汉龙,彭 吉力 ,陈永辉. 真空-堆载联合预压的地基沉降简化计算方法[J]. , 2006, 27(5): 745-748.
[12] 王志亮 ,孙锡杰,. 考虑土体应力历史影响的沉降修正初探[J]. , 2006, 27(10): 1723-1726.
[13] 徐金明 ,汤永净 . 分层总和法计算沉降的几点改进[J]. , 2003, 24(4): 518-521.
[14] 何思明,卢国胜,廖祖伟. 群桩沉降计算理论分析[J]. , 2003, 24(3): 435-441.
[15] 何思明 . 基于弹塑性理论的修正分层总和法[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 88-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!