岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1341-1350.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2310

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑不同影响因素的砂岩损伤特征 及其卸荷破坏细观特性研究

王 宇1, 2, 3,艾 芊1,李建林1,邓华锋1   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 中国水利水电科学研究院 流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室, 北京 100044;3. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-20 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-25
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金项目(No. 2017CFB605);中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室开放研究基金(No.IWHR-SKL-201513);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51309142,No.51439003);防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室(三峡大学)开放研究基金项目(No.2016KJZ15)。

Damage characteristics of sandstone under different influence factors and its unloading failure meso-morphology properties

WANG Yu1, 2, 3, AI Qian1, LI Jian-lin1, DENG Hua-feng1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education,China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-power Research, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2017-11-20 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-25
  • About author:王宇,女,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China(No.2017CFB605), the Open Research Foundation of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydro-power Research and the State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin(IWHR-SKL-201513), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51309142,51439003) and the Open Research Foundation of Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in China Three Gorges University(2016KJZ15).

摘要: 实际赋存环境中损伤岩体普遍存在,选取典型砂岩进行蠕变、饱水损伤模拟,进行不同影响因素作用下的岩样损伤变量分析计算,并进行不同影响因素作用下的损伤砂岩卸荷破坏试验,利用ST400型三维表面形貌仪对损伤砂岩卸荷破坏表面进行形貌特征参数对比分析,探讨蠕变、饱水损伤对卸荷破坏面形貌变化影响机制。通过损伤变量分析表明:弹性模量法能较好地反映不同影响因素作用下的岩样损伤程度;而超声波检测法对水敏感性强,不能准确描述蠕变劣化岩样饱水后的损伤程度。不同损伤程度试样卸荷破坏面形貌高度特征参数及分形参数分析表明:蠕变、饱水损伤增加了破坏面的整体粗糙程度,使破坏面形貌的离散性和波动性较大;蠕变、饱水损伤导致试样破坏面形貌平整度较低、各向异性显著,且分形维数随着试样由负损伤向正损伤转化出现先减小后增大的趋势;对比分析两组试样可知,蠕变损伤后的饱水作用对试样破坏面形貌特征影响不显著,蠕变损伤仍起控制作用。

关键词: 岩石力学, 损伤变量, 三维形貌扫描, 形貌特征参数

Abstract:

Considering the universal existance of damaged rock mass in the actual environment, the typical sandstone was selected to investigate the creep and saturation induced damage. The damage variable analysis and calculationunder different influence factors were carried out. Based on unloading failure tests on damaged sandstone samples under different influence factors, the morphological characteristics of the unloading failure surfaces were compared and analyzed by using ST400 type 3D surface topography instrument, and the influencing mechanism of creep and saturation induced damage on the morphology of the unloading failure surface was discussed. The damage variable analysis shows that the elastic modulus method can well reflect the damage degree under different influence factors, while the ultrasonic detection method is sensitive to saturation and incapable to describe the damage degree of sandstone after creep and saturation. Morphology characteristic and fractal characteristic of the unloading failure surfaces from specimens with different damage degree show that the creep and saturation damage increases the overall roughness of the unloading failure surface, which makes the dispersion and fluctuation of the failure surface become larger. Meanwhile, the creep and saturation damage results in low roughness and obvious anisotropy of the failure surface and the fractal dimension decreases first and then increases with the damage changes from negative to positive. Compared analysis of two group specimens shows that saturation after creep damage has no significant influence on morphological characteristics of the unloading failure surface, which means that creep damage is the main influence factor.

Key words: rock mechanics, damage variable, 3D morphology scanning, morphology characteristic parameters

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[4] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[5] 大久保诚介, 汤 杨, 许江, 彭守建, 陈灿灿, 严召松, . 3D-DIC系统在岩石力学试验中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3263-3273.
[6] 张艳博, 梁鹏, 孙林, 田宝柱, 姚旭龙, 刘祥鑫, . 单轴压缩下饱水花岗岩破裂过程声发射 频谱特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2497-2506.
[7] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[8] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[9] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[10] 苏国韶, 燕思周, 闫召富, 翟少彬, 燕柳斌, . 真三轴加载条件下岩爆过程的声发射演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[11] 李晓照, 戚承志, 邵珠山, 屈小磊, . 基于细观力学脆性岩石剪切特性演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1358-1367.
[12] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 雷 江, 于洪丹, 邢天海, 郑有雷, 贾晓东, . 并联型软岩温度-渗流-应力耦合三轴流变仪的研制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1213-1220.
[13] 郑广辉, 许金余, 王 鹏, 方新宇, 王佩玺, 闻 名, . 冻融循环作用下层理砂岩物理特性及劣化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 632-641.
[14] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[15] 李晓照, 邵珠山, 戚承志, . 岩石裂纹损伤及围压对剪切破坏影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4249-4258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!