岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1699-1708.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1056

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型

薛秀丽,刘治珩,曾超峰,白宁,陈宏波   

  1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-19 接受日期:2024-01-12 出版日期:2024-06-19 发布日期:2024-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 曾超峰,男,1987年生,博士(后),教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: cfzeng@hnust.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:薛秀丽,女,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: xlxue@hnust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978261);湖南省自然科学基金(No.2022JJ20023);湖南省科技创新计划项目(No.2022RC1172)。

Calculation model of unlimited earth pressure on both sides of enclosure wall during pre-excavation dewatering

XUE Xiu-li, LIU Zhi-heng, ZENG Chao-feng, BAI Ning, CHEN Hong-bo   

  1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2023-07-19 Accepted:2024-01-12 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978261), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2022JJ20023) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2022RC1172).

摘要: 基坑开挖前的坑内抽水可引起围挡发生厘米级的侧移,但现行基坑设计理论仅提出了基于弹性支点法的土方开挖诱发围挡受力变形的计算方法,却并未提出如何计算基坑开挖前抽水引起的围挡侧移。若要沿用弹性支点法进行抽水侧移的计算,则如何确定抽水过程中围挡两侧土压力分布成为关键。为了提出基坑开挖前抽水条件下围挡两侧土压力的计算模型,首先提出了基坑开挖前抽水过程中围挡两侧土体受扰动区形态与范围;然后探明了扰动区内土体应变分布规律并提出土体应变分布模式;进一步地,建立了土体应变与围挡侧移的数学方程,并结合土体应力−应变方程最终构建了开挖前抽水条件下考虑基坑围挡侧移影响的土压力计算模型。所提出的土压力模型能够反映基坑开挖前抽水过程中围挡侧移对土压力的非线性影响,公式形式简单,参数取值方便,可为后续预测抽水引起的基坑围挡侧移提供重要基础。

关键词: 基坑围挡位移, 开挖前降水, 应变状态模式, 应力路径, 非极限土压力

Abstract: Pre-excavation dewatering (PED) can induce centimeter-level movements in the enclosure wall. Current foundation pit design theory only proposes a calculation method for excavation-induced force and deformation of the enclosure wall based on the elastic fulcrum method, which does not address PED-induced wall deflections. To continue using the elastic fulcrum method for calculating PED-induced wall deflections, it is crucial to determine the distribution of earth pressure on both sides of the enclosure wall during PED. This study aims to propose a novel model for calculating the PED-induced earth pressure on both sides of the enclosure wall. First, we analyzed the shape and influence range of disturbed soil on both sides of the enclosure wall during PED. Then, we explored the characteristics of soil strain distribution in the disturbed zone and proposed a distribution mode for the soil strain. Furthermore, we established a mathematical equation presenting the relationship between the soil strain and enclosure wall deflections, and proposed a calculation model of earth pressure considering the wall deflections during PED. The proposed calculation model accurately reflects the nonlinear relationship between wall deflections and earth pressure during PED. The obtained model, with its simple formulation and easily available data, could provide an important reference for predicting PED-induced enclosure wall deflections.

Key words: enclosure wall deflection, pre-excavation dewatering, strain state mode, stress path, non-limit state earth pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU46
[1] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[2] 王贵宾, 刘桓兑, 唐明豪, 杨春和, 陈世万, . 复杂应力路径下的花岗岩洞室开挖损伤区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2539-2553.
[3] 李永强, 许言, 陈波, 熊健辉, 卢玢宇, . 反压诱导有效应力增生模式与土体强度关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2338-2350.
[4] 陈军浩, 张艳娥, 王刚, 王恒, . 不同固结路径下钙质砂固结排水强度性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2290-2298.
[5] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 程胜锦, 田世轩, 陈岩, . 不同控制方式和卸荷应力路径下类岩石节理剪切强度特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2061-2071.
[6] 范浩, 王磊, 王连国, . 不同应力路径下层理煤体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 385-395.
[7] 李尧, 李嘉评. 复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2555-2565.
[8] 张季如, 郑颜军, 彭伟珂, 王磊, 陈敬鑫. 填土应力路径下珊瑚砂幂律应力-应变模型的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1309-1318.
[9] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 周振华, 简涛, 李甜果, . 卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 473-482.
[10] 钟丽, 陈鑫莲, 刘晓璇, 罗明星, 王兴肖. 不同应力路径下钙质砂的力学及变形特性 试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2929-2941.
[11] 高敏, 何绍衡, 夏唐代, 丁智, 王新刚, 张琼方, . 复杂应力路径下钙质砂颗粒破碎及抗剪强度特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 321-330.
[12] 王海波, 吕伟华, 武荘, 朱文波, . 不同温度应力路径下饱和黏土剪切特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 679-687.
[13] 胡利文, 刘志军, . 真空预压加固土体变形机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 790-799.
[14] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[15] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!