›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 3776-3782.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

房屋注浆抬升实践与监测分析

易小明1,张顶立1,逄铁铮2,骆建军1   

  1. 1.北京交通大学 隧道与地下工程教育部工程研究中心,北京 100044;2.厦门路桥建设集团有限公司,厦门 361026
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-08 出版日期:2009-12-10 发布日期:2010-01-18
  • 作者简介:易小明,男,1979年生,博士后,主要从事城市地铁和海底隧道相关研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家863项目大型跨海隧道钻爆法修建核心技术研究资助(No. 2006AA11Z119)。

Practice and monitoring analysis of building lifting due to grouting

YI Xiao-ming1, ZHANG Ding-li1, PANG Tie-zheng2, LUO Jian-jun1   

  1. 1. Tunnel and Underground Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Xiamen Road & Bridge Construction Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen 361026, China
  • Received:2008-04-08 Online:2009-12-10 Published:2010-01-18

摘要:

厦门梧村山浅埋大跨隧道,要求下穿浦南片区密集建筑群,其工程难度国内外罕见。通过对现场房屋的抬升实践和监测分析发现:房屋注浆抬升可分为两个层次,即注浆止沉和注浆抬升。现场抬升试验表明:采用动态跟踪补偿注浆能够较好地实现房屋止沉,而房屋的抬升则极富挑战性。一方面房屋抬升必须以补偿注浆、止浆墙完成、地层加固密实为前提;另一方面还必须选取合适的注浆工艺、注浆量、压力、抬升孔分布、注浆深度等,才可能实现抬升。抬升过程监控还发现:地层抬升明显,房屋止沉效果良好;但房屋抬升呈波动趋势,最终房屋仍呈沉降趋势。该结果反应了注浆地层抬升与房屋抬升是不一致的,只有较大范围、稳定的、均匀的、不消散的地表抬升,才能形成安全有效的房屋抬升。通过相关的解析和数值方法,对抬升注浆参数进行初步优选以及对房屋抬升量进行预测,结果可以满足工程需要。

关键词: 房屋注浆抬升, 浅埋大跨, 下穿, 监测, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Wucunshan Tunnel of Xiamen which is designed as shallow large span structure needs to go through dense buildings in Punan territory, and construction difficulties is unusual both at home and abroad. By in-situ building lifting test and monitoring, two levels of building lifting by grouting can be seen: the first level is controlling and cutting building subsidence, the second is named building lifting strictly. The in-situ lifting tests show that the first level can be achieved with dynamic tracking and retrieving grouting successfully, whereas the second level requires much more refined grouting techniques. On one hand, the fulfilling of building lifting must be on the premise of the first level of retrieving grouting, finishing wall for grouting, and enforcing foundation soil. On the other hand, it depends on adequate grouting technologies, grouting amount, pressure, arrangement of grouting holes, holes and depths, etc. Related monitoring results make clear that land lifting is standing out, and building subsidence is distinctly slowed down, however, building lifting is only light and fluctuant, and finally trend to subside. And they also show that there is great difference between land and building liftings, only large range, stable, uniform, undissipated land lifting can make safe and effective building lifting, By analytical and numerical methods, lifting grouting parameters will be optimized and gained, and building lifting deformation can be predicted, which can generally meet the engineering needs.

Key words: building lifting by grouting, shallow large span, going through buildings, monitoring, numerical modeling

中图分类号: 

  • TU 753.8
[1] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[4] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[5] 郑 帅, 姜谙男, 张峰瑞, 张勇, 申发义, 姜旭东、. 基于机器学习与可靠度算法的围岩动态分级方法 及其工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 308-318.
[6] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[7] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[8] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[9] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[10] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[11] 李悄, 孟繁增, 牛远志. 压重顶进框构下穿高铁引起桥墩变形及控制技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3618-3624.
[12] 陈炳瑞, 吴昊, 池秀文, 刘辉, 伍梦蝶, 晏俊伟, . 基于STA/LTA岩石破裂微震信号实时识 别算法及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3689-3696.
[13] 吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑 流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[14] 孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[15] 杜文, 王永红, 李利, 朱连臣, 朱浩天, 王有旗, . 双层车站密贴下穿既有隧道案例分析及 隧道沉降变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2765-2773.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 田 威,党发宁,丁卫华,梁昕宇,陈厚群. 适于CT试验的动态加载设备研制及其应用[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 309 -313 .
[3] 谭捍华,傅鹤林. TDR技术在公路边坡监测中的应用试验[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1331 -1336 .
[4] 叶俊能. 列车荷载下轨道系统-层状横观各向同性饱和地基动力响应[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1597 -1603 .
[5] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[6] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[7] 毛 宁,张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[8] 余天堂. 模拟三维裂纹问题的扩展有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3280 -3285 .
[9] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[10] 李伟华,赵成刚,杜楠馨. 软弱饱和土夹层对地铁车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .