掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 51-55.

掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究

孙树林¹, ²，李方³，谌军⁴

1. 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室，南京 210098；2. 河海大学地球探测与信息技术研究所，南京 210098； 3. 江苏南京工程高等职业学校，南京 211113；4. 水利部河北水利水电勘测设计研究院，天津 300250

收稿日期:2008-01-27 出版日期:2010-01-10 发布日期:2010-02-02
作者简介:孙树林，男，1963年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事地质及岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。
基金资助:
河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室开放研究基金资助项目(No. 2005408911)；留学回国人员科研基金项目资助 (No. 20071108)。

Electrical resistivity measurement for lime-stabilized silt soil

SUN Shu-lin¹,²，LI Fang³，CHEN Jun⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Institute of Geodetection and Information Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 3. Jiangsu Nanjng Engineering Vocational College, Nanjing 211113, China; 4. Hebei Research Institute of Investigation & Design of Water Conservancy & Hydropower, Tianjin 300250, China

Received:2008-01-27 Online:2010-01-10 Published:2010-02-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用4电极电阻率测量装置，在室内对各种灰土样的电阻率进行测试对比研究，揭示了不同因素如灰土比、含水率、饱和度、土的结构和土粒粒径等对灰土样电阻率的影响。在不同含水率（15 %、20 %、25 %和30 %）条件下，素土及其与不同石灰掺量（1:10、1:15和1:30）的混合，通过轻型击实试验后，测量其横向及竖向断面上的电阻率，研究电阻率与不同石灰配比击实土样的物理力学性质之间的关系。实验结果表明，当含水率在15 %~20 %之间时，较小的含水率增量引起混合土样电阻率的大幅度下降；当含水率约达到20 %后，其电阻率随含水率的继续增加而减小的幅度很小；在15 %含水率时，掺灰土电阻率比素土样高；在30 %含水率时，其电阻率低于素土样，而且掺量越大，电阻率越低；由于击实导致土体颗粒的结构重新排列，电阻率在横向上大于竖向；电阻率随着无侧限抗压强度的增加而增加，在电阻率大于50 ?•m时，电阻率随无侧限抗压强度的增加而减小；饱和度、干密度与电阻率呈负指数变化规律，孔隙率、孔隙比与电阻率呈指数变化规律；含水率对于电阻率的影响较为敏感。

关键词: 电阻率, 极距, 击实土, 敏感性分析

Abstract:

The electrical resistivity of various lime-soil samples are studied indoor with four electrode resistivity measurement, the effects of different factors such as lime-soil ratio, water content, water saturation, soil structure and particle size on lime-soil samples were revealed. Under different water contents (about 15 %, 20 %, 25 % and 30 %), soil were mixed with lime at different lime-soil ratios (about pure soil, 1:10, 1:15 and 1:30). With light compaction test, the traverse and vertical resistivity of mixed soil samples were measured and the relationships between resistivity and physical properties of mixed soil samples with different lime-soil ratios are studied too. The electrical resistivity of mixed soil samples drops greatly with 15 %-20 % water contents, increases with about 20 % water content; and the resistivity reduces as the water content increased continuously. The electrical resistivity of lime-mixed soil sample larger than electrical resistivity of pure soil with 15 % water content, but the resistivity of lime-mixed soil samples is smaller than pure soil samples with 30 % water content. The resistivity is more lower as the lime mixing amount is larger. The electrical resistivity at transverse section is larger than at vertical section. The electrical resistivity increases from 0 to 50 ?•m as the unconfined compression strength increases. When the electrical resistivity larger than 50 ?•m, the resistivity decreases as unconfined compression strength increases. The relationship between water saturation and dry density is negative exponent; the relationship between porosity and void ratio is exponent reverse to the dry density. The resistivity is sensitive to the water content.

Key words: electrical resistivity, electrode distance, compacted soil, sensitivity analysis

中图分类号:

TU 443

孙树林，李方，谌军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51-55.

SUN Shu-lin，LI Fang，CHEN Jun. Electrical resistivity measurement for lime-stabilized silt soil[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51-55.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[2]	闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[3]	查甫生, 刘晶晶, 许龙, 邓永锋, 杨成斌, 储诚富, . 水泥−粉煤灰固化/稳定重金属污染土的电阻率特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4573-4580.
[4]	陈瑞锋，田高源，米栋云，董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[5]	郭重阳，李典庆，曹子君，高国辉，唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[6]	陈卫忠，马永尚，于洪丹，龚哲，李香玲，. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
[7]	张永杰，夏旖琪，冯夏庭，王桂尧，. 陡坡段双桩-柱基础简化计算方法及影响因素分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1705-1715.
[8]	储亚，查甫生，刘松玉，蔡国军，寇博,. 基于电阻率法的膨胀土膨胀性评价研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 157-164.
[9]	林杰. 基于电阻率法的黏性土场地工程性质评价[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 685-689.
[10]	邹飞，龙万学，李亮,. 楔形刀具侵入岩石损伤破坏影响因素的理论分析及数值模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2101-2108.
[11]	谌文武，毕骏，马亚维，刘伟，江耀, . MK模型的拟合方程和预测方程在土-水特征曲线中的应用及参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3208-3214.
[12]	雷勇，刘泽. 基于H-B准则的公路桥梁桩基嵌岩深度计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 457-462.
[13]	储亚，刘松玉，蔡国军，边汉亮 , . 锌污染土物理与电学特性试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2862-2868.
[14]	张少华，李熠，寇晓辉，董晓强. 水泥固化锌污染土电阻率与强度特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2899-2906.
[15]	崔永圣，马林，刘宏岳，黄佳坤，. 珊瑚岛礁工程地球物理方法初探[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 683-689.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed