落锥法确定粉土液限和塑限的试验研究

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2569-2574.

落锥法确定粉土液限和塑限的试验研究

郭莹¹，²，王琦²

1. 大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室，大连 116024；2. 大连理工大学土木水利学院岩土工程研究所，大连 116024

收稿日期:2007-11-20 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
作者简介:郭莹，女，1963年生，博士，副教授，主要从事土工试验技术、土动力学研究与土力学及基础工程教学工作。

Experimental research on fall cone test to determine liquid limit and plastic limit of silts

GUO Ying¹, ², WANG Qi¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2007-11-20 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对部分细粒土进行了室内落锥法确定液限和塑限的试验研究，试验结果表明：对于一些细粒土在双对数坐标上圆锥下沉深度与含水率之间的关系并非线性关系，无法依据线性关系确定液、塑限；采用规程建议的3个含水率范围有时根本无法获得有效试验数据，采用规程建议的3个含水率范围确定得到粉土的液、塑限试验结果的可靠性有待商榷；采用直线段试验数据确定的液、塑限进行分类可能出现相互矛盾甚至错误的结果。进一步试验结果表明：对于黏粒含量高于13 %的粉土，由于其抗剪强度以凝聚分量为主，落锥法适用，所测塑性指数能够反映其可塑性；对于部分黏粒含量低于13 %的粉土及外观接近粉土的粉砂，由于其抗剪强度以颗粒间摩擦分量为主，落锥法不再适用，所测塑性指数不能反映其可塑性。

关键词: 落锥法, 粉土, 土体分类, 液限, 塑限, 可塑性, 黏粒, 抗剪强度

Abstract:

A series of fall cone tests are performed to determine the liquid limits and the plastic limits of fine grained soil. The result shows that the log-log relationships between penetration depth of fall cone and water content of some fine grained soil are clearly nonlinear; and the liquid limits and the plastic limits can not be obtained according to the linear relation. Effective test data can not be measured within the three ranges of water contents proposed by the present standards. The dependability is necessary to discuss about the liquid-plastic limit test results obtained from three ranges. It is possible that the contradictory and wrong classification results exist by using the liquid limits and the plastic limits obtained from the test data with straight line. The further test results show that the fall cone test is suitable for the silts over 13 % clay particles content since the shear strength is mainly controlled by cohesion; and the plasticity is available from the plasticity indexes. On the contrary, the fall cone test is not suitable for the other silts and the silty sands which are similar to silts, because the shear strength is mainly controlled by particle friction. At last, some opinions about the fine grained soil classification are given.

Key words: fall cone test, silt, soil classification, liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity, clay particles, shear strength

中图分类号:

TU 411

郭莹，王琦. 落锥法确定粉土液限和塑限的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2569-2574.

GUO Ying, WANG Qi. Experimental research on fall cone test to determine liquid limit and plastic limit of silts[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2569-2574.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[2]	李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[3]	张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[4]	王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[5]	郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[6]	张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[7]	洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[8]	周小文, 程力, 周密, 王齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[9]	付宏渊, 刘杰, 曾铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
[10]	马文冠, 刘润, 练继建, 郭绍曾. 粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1307-1312.
[11]	张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王南, 樊孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体（CGN+C）界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[12]	邱敏, 袁青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
[13]	周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[14]	李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
[15]	杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed