脆性岩石卸围压强度特性试验研究

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2588-2594.

脆性岩石卸围压强度特性试验研究

刘豆豆¹，²，陈卫忠²，³，杨建平³，谭贤君³，周喜德⁴

1. 山东财政学院工商管理学院，济南 250014；2. 山东大学岩土与结构工程研究中心，济南 250061； 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，武汉 430071；4. 二滩水电开发有限责任公司，成都 610021

收稿日期:2008-04-24 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
作者简介:刘豆豆，女，1977年生，博士，讲师，主要从事岩土工程方面的研究与教学工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金与雅砻江联合基金（5057987）和国家自然科学基金重大研究计划（90510019）项目资助。

Experimental research on strength characteristic of brittle rock unloading confining pressure

LIU Dou-dou¹, ², CHEN Wei-zhong², ³, YANG Jian-ping³, TAN Xian-jun³, ZHOU Xi-de⁴

1. Institute of Business Administration, Shandong University of Finance, Ji’nan 250014, China; 2. Research Center of Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China; 3. Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 4. Ertan Hydropower Development Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610021, China

Received:2008-04-24 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

岩样的承载能力由材料强度和围压共同确定，轴向压缩和卸围压二者都能导致岩样破坏，但由于应力路径不同，两种条件导致岩样的破坏过程并不相同。对取自位于雅砻江上的锦屏二级水电站辅助洞内的白山组大理岩进行了常规三轴试验和峰前、峰后卸围压试验，通过对试验曲线和岩样破坏特征的分析表明：无论是峰前还是峰后卸围压，岩样都表现出脆性破坏的特征，而岩样破坏表现出的脆性峰前卸围压比峰后卸围压更为强烈；岩样在加、卸载条件下的变形均随主应力差的增大而增大，但在相同的主应力差下，卸载产生的扩容量比加载的扩容量更大；峰前卸围压试验当围压卸到初始围压值的60 %左右时，岩样发生破坏；峰后卸围压试验当围压卸到初始围压值的80 %左右时，岩样发生破坏。结论对相关工程稳定性分析、设计和施工具有一定的指导意义和参考价值。

关键词: 峰前卸围压, 峰后卸围压, 卸载

Abstract:

The bearing capacity of rock sample is determined by material strength and confining pressure together. Both axial compression and unloading confining pressure can induce the failure of rock sample, but because of different stress paths, the failure processes under two conditions are different. The tests of conventional triaxial, pre-peak unloading confining pressure and post-peak unloading confining pressure are done to the Baishan marble which comes from access tunnel in Jinping Hydropower Station lying on Yalong River. The test curve and the rock sample failure characteristics indicate that rock samples are all showing brittle failure in pre-peak and post-peak unloading confining pressure tests; and the brittle characteristics in pre-peak test is more stronger than that in post-peak test. The deformations of rock sample in loading and unloading are increasing with the increase of principal stress difference; but dilatancy in unloading is bigger than that in loading under the same principal stress difference. Rock sample fails as confining pressure unloaded to about 60 % of initial confining pressure in pre-peak unloading confining pressure test; and as confining pressure unloaded to about 80 % of initial confining pressure in post-peak unloading confining pressure test, it fails. The conclusion can be for reference in internal correlative engineering stability analysis, design and construction.

Key words: pre-peak unloading confining pressure, post-peak unloading confining pressure, unloading

中图分类号:

TU 457

刘豆豆，陈卫忠，杨建平，谭贤君，周喜德. 脆性岩石卸围压强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2588-2594.

LIU Dou-dou, CHEN Wei-zhong, YANG Jian-ping, TAN Xian-jun, ZHOU X. Experimental research on strength characteristic of brittle rock unloading confining pressure[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2588-2594.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈勇, 苏剑, 谈云志, CHAN Dave, . 循环脱吸湿与加卸载耦合作用下土体持水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2907-2913.
[2]	王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.
[3]	李军, 张杨, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 史林肯, . 花岗岩三轴循环加卸载条件下的气体渗透率[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 693-700.
[4]	王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.
[5]	杨小彬，韩心星，刘恩来，张子鹏，王逍遥, . 循环加卸载下花岗岩非均匀变形演化的声发射特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2732-2739.
[6]	翟明磊，郭保华，李冰洋，焦峰,. 岩石节理分级剪切加载-蠕变-卸载的能量与变形特征[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2865-2872.
[7]	张玉伟，谢永利，翁木生，. 非对称基坑开挖对下卧地铁隧道影响的离心试验[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2555-2562.
[8]	刘超，张东明，尚德磊，赵宏刚，宋真龙，俞欢, . 峰后围压卸载对原煤变形和渗透特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2017-2024.
[9]	杨贵，孙欣，王阳阳, . 高聚物堆石料回弹特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1669-1674.
[10]	段敏克，蒋长宝，俞欢，陆天宇，钮彬炜，孙东玲,. 分级加-卸载条件下原煤的渗透及能耗特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1346-1354.
[11]	侯鑫，马巍，李国玉，穆彦虎，周志伟，王飞,. 木质素磺酸盐对兰州黄土力学性质的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 18-26.
[12]	王超圣，周宏伟，何树生，王子辉，刘建锋，. 卸载速率对北山花岗岩强度影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 151-157.
[13]	李浩，白海波，武建军，赵慧明，孟庆彬，马凯，黄卫星，郑磊，. 循环荷载下完整底板导水通道演化过程研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 447-454.
[14]	汪泓，杨天鸿，刘洪磊，赵永川，邓文学，侯宪港,. 循环荷载下干燥与饱和砂岩力学特性及能量演化[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1600-1608.
[15]	杜海民，马巍，张淑娟，周志伟. 三轴循环加卸载条件下高含冰冻结砂土变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1675-1681.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed