›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2727-2732.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于ARMA模型的隧道位移时间序列分析

尹光志12,岳 顺12,钟 焘12,李德泉3   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400030;2. 重庆大学 西南资源开发及环境灾害控制工程教育部重点实验室,重庆 400030; 3. 重庆市公用事业建设工程公司,重庆 400020
  • 收稿日期:2008-03-02 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
  • 作者简介:尹光志,男,1962年生,教授、博士,博士生导师,重庆大学资源及环境科学学院院长,主要从事岩石力学与工程方向的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(50374084)资助。

YIN Guang-zhi1, 2, YUE Shun1, 2, ZHONG Tao1, 2, LI De-quan3   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 2. Key Laboratory for the Exploitation of Southwest Resources and the Environmental Disaster Control Engineering, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 3. Chongqing Public Utility Construction Engineering Co., Chongqing 400030, China
  • Received:2008-03-02 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要:

在新奥法隧道施工中,隧道位移监测对于评价围岩稳定性和支护结构合理性起重要作用。目前大都采用AR模型对隧道位移进行时间序列分析,避开了非线性估计,致使拟合精度和模型实用性较差。为此,介绍了具有较高预测精度和较好适用条件的ARMA模型及其常用参数估计方法,基于其参数非线性估计带来的不便性,提出一种ARMA模型参数估计近似线性方法,把残差用Taylor级数一阶展开,将非线性估计线性化,用线性最小二乘法估计参数最终值。用该方法对重庆市大足县南环二路南山隧道位移监测数据进行时间序列建模分析,预测与实测值吻合较好,证明了该方法的实用性。

关键词: ARMA模型, 隧道位移, 近似线性最小二乘法

Abstract:

The displacement monitoring of tunnel plays an important role in assessing surrounding rock’s stability and supporting structure’s rationality during using new Austrian tunneling method (NATM). In light of the fact that auto regressive (AR) model is usually adopted to analyze displacement of tunnel with time series, which avoids nonlinear estimation but leads to lower fitting accuracy and poorer model’s practicality. The auto regressive moving average (ARMA) model which has higher accuracy and good practicability is reviewed; its common parameter estimate methods is introduced; and a parametric estimation approximate linear method of ARMA model is presented in light of the inconvenience of the nonlinear parameter estimation of ARMA model, which linearizes nonlinear estimation through expanding residues with Taylor series in first order, and then estimate final parameter with linear least square method. Using the method of time series to model and analyze the displacement monitoring data of Nanshan tunnel in Dazu county of Chongqing, the prediction is in agreement with actual measurements; it is proved that the method is basically feasible.

Key words: ARMA model, displacement of tunnel, approximate linear least square method

中图分类号: 

  • O 24
[1] 曹 净,丁文云,赵党书,宋志刚,刘海明. 基于LSSVM-ARMA模型的基坑变形时间序列预测[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 579-586.
[2] 曾开华1,鞠海燕1,张常光2. 深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解及其比较分析[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1315-1319.
[3] 谈小龙,徐卫亚,梁桂兰,孟永东,张金龙. 高边坡变形非线性时变统计模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1633-1637.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏龙海,王明年,赵东平,吉艳雷. 翔安海底公路隧道陆域段变形控制措施研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 577 -581 .
[2] 陈运平,王思敬. 多级循环荷载下饱和岩石的弹塑性响应[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1030 -1034 .
[3] 贾 强,张 鑫. 板式基础托换法开发地下空间施工过程的数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1989 -1994 .
[4] 顾绍付,刘仰韶,刘仕顺. Asaoka法推算软基沉降偏差的修正方法探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2238 -2240 .
[5] 李雄威,孔令伟,郭爱国. 气候影响下膨胀土工程性质的原位响应特征试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2069 -2074 .
[6] 宋勇军,胡 伟,王德胜,周军林. 基于修正剑桥模型的挤密桩挤土效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 811 -814 .
[7] 孙德安,孟德林,孙文静,刘月妙. 两种膨润土的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 973 -0978 .
[8] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[9] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,王 超. 深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .
[10] 褚福永 ,朱俊高 ,贾 华 ,安淑红. 粗粒土卸载-再加载力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1061 -1066 .