曲线拟合法对路基小变形情形适用性研究

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2763-2769.

曲线拟合法对路基小变形情形适用性研究

王星运¹，陈善雄¹，余飞¹，周博²

1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071；2. 山西省交通规划勘察设计院，太原 030012

收稿日期:2008-11-18 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
作者简介:王星运，男，1982年生，主要从事铁路、公路路基稳定性及地基处理、边坡治理的研究。
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向性项目（kzcx2-yw-150）；岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室重点项目（SKLZ08032）。

Study of applicability of curve fitting methods in small settlement of subgrade

WANG Xing-yun¹, CHEN Shan-xiong¹, YU Fei¹, ZHOU Bo²

1. State Key laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2. Traffic Planning Surveying & Designing Institute of Shanxi Province,Taiyuan 030012, China

Received:2008-11-18 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

双曲线法、三点法、指数曲线法和Asaoka法等曲线拟合法在软土路基的沉降预测中已经得到广泛应用，但在路基小变形情形的应用研究尚少。结合某铁路客运专线施工现场观测的路基小变形数据，对这4种方法，探讨了时间起点和样本值的起止时间间隔对相关系数的影响，且验算后期观测值的预测效果；并综合考虑了相关系数和相对误差，研究每种方法的适用性；指出了4种拟合方法在路基小变形情形应用的优缺点。研究表明：数据的波动会造成指数曲线法无法计算；沉降数据波动较小时，双曲线法、三点法、Asaoka法的拟合效果均较好；当沉降数据波动较大时，仅三点法、Asaoka法的拟合效果较好，双曲线法较差。

关键词: 曲线拟合法, 小变形, 无碴轨道, 路基沉降, 相对误差, 相关系数

Abstract:

Hyperbola method, three-point method, exponent curve method, Asaoka method etc. are widely applied to settlement prediction for soft soil ground; but less study of applying to case of small settlement. With regard to the four methods, the small settlement data from the construction site of a passenger dedicated railway line are used to study the influence of starting point of calculation time and span of starting and ending time of the sample on relative error and prediction effect of the last observed values are checked. Comprehensively considering correlative coefficient and relative error, the applicability of every method is studied and the advantages and disadvantages for every method are analyzed. The research results show that the exponent curve method can not fit to the case of small settlement: other three methods all provide better fit to the real data when the settlement data fluctuation is small; however only three-point method and Asaoka method fit better if settlement data fluctuation is not small.

Key words: curve fitting methods, small settlement, ground settlement, ballastless track, relative error, correlative coefficient

中图分类号:

O 241.5

王星运，陈善雄，余飞，周博. 曲线拟合法对路基小变形情形适用性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2763-2769.

WANG Xing-yun, CHEN Shan-xiong, YU Fei, ZHOU Bo. Study of applicability of curve fitting methods in small settlement of subgrade[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2763-2769.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	宋晶，叶冠林，徐永福，孙德安，. 考虑固结历史的结构性软土路基沉降数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1037-1046.
[2]	郑栋，李典庆，曹子君，方国光, . 土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性及系统可靠度的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 517-524.
[3]	王培鑫，周顺华，狄宏规，李雪, . 基坑开挖对邻近铁路路基变形影响与控制[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 469-476.
[4]	黄雪峰，孔洋，李旭东，马龙，杨宝山，. 压实黄土变形特性研究与应用[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 37-44.
[5]	唐仁华，陈昌富，梁冠亭. 框架式预应力锚固系统分阶段可靠性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 217-225.
[6]	陈鹏宇，乔景顺，彭祖武，谢凯，余宏明 . 基于等级相关的泥石流危险因子筛选与危险度评价[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1409-1415.
[7]	陈鹏宇，余宏明，刘勇，李才，彭祖武 . 基于独立信息数据波动赋权的泥石流危险度评价[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 449-454.
[8]	袁堃，章金钊，朱东鹏 , . 深上限-退化型多年冻土路基变形特征分析[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3543-3548.
[9]	仇玉良，丁洲祥 . 一维小变形主、次固结耦合理论模型分析[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1957-1964.
[10]	牛富俊，林战举，鲁嘉濠，刘华. 青藏铁路路桥过渡段沉降变形影响因素分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 372-377.
[11]	詹永祥，蒋关鲁. 无碴轨道路基基床动力特性的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 392-396.
[12]	詹永祥，蒋关鲁，胡安华，魏永幸. 遂渝线无碴轨道桩板结构路基动力响应现场试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 832-835.
[13]	詹永祥，蒋关鲁，牛国辉，魏永幸 . 桩板结构路基动力模型试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(8): 2097-2101.
[14]	李典庆. 基桩可靠度分析的统计相关性评价方法[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 633-638.
[15]	黄诚，杨春和，吕涛. 岩土力学数值模拟结果的概率评估方法研究[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 727-733.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed