锚杆对围岩的加固效果和动载响应的数值分析

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2805-2809.

锚杆对围岩的加固效果和动载响应的数值分析

杨自友¹，²，顾金才²，³，杨本水¹，陈安敏³，徐景茂³

1. 安徽建筑工业学院土木工程学院，合肥 230022；2. 中国科学技术大学近代力学系，合肥 230026； 3. 总参工程兵科研三所，洛阳 471023

收稿日期:2008-03-05 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
作者简介:杨自友，男，1975年生，博士，副教授，研究方向为岩土工程及矿业工程。
基金资助:
安徽建筑工业学院博士基金会（2009）资助。

Numerical analysis of reinforcement effects and response to dynamic loads characteristics of rock bolts

YANG Zi-you¹, ², GU Jin-cai², ³, YANG Ben-shui¹, CHEN An-min³, XU Jing-mao³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Anhui University of Architecture, Hefei 230022, China; 2. Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China; 3. The Third Research Institute of the Corps of Engineering, General Staff of CPLA, Luoyang 471023, China

Received:2008-03-05 Online:2009-09-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用数值分析软件LS-DYNA3D程序，对锚杆对围岩的加固效果和动态力学性能进行了显示动力分析，比较了洞室围岩是否用锚杆加固时，爆炸波引起的岩体中垂直应力、拱顶位移以及锚杆本身轴向应变的变化特点。结果发现：同毛洞相比较，加固洞室围岩应力较大，拱顶位移较小；通过分析锚杆轴向应变-时程曲线，发现不同安装角的锚杆其轴向应变对动载的响应不同，拱部锚杆先受压后受拉，直墙部锚杆全受拉，两部位锚杆均产生轴向拉应变；将模拟的锚杆应变-时程曲线同模型试验的相应曲线进行了比较，两者一致性较好，其结果为动载作用下坑道围岩锚杆加固的布置方法提供了参考。

关键词: 锚杆, 加固效果, 爆炸波, 数值分析, 力学性能

Abstract:

The explicit dynamic analysis of the reinforcement effects and dynamic characteristics of rock bolts is carried out by LS-DYNA software. The change features of vertical stress of rockmass, vault displacement and axial strain of rock bolts themselves caused by explosive waves are compared whether wall rock is reinforced or not. By comparing the cavern that is not reinforced, the stress of wall rock is larger and the displacement of vault is less than the cavern that is reinforced by rock bolts. By analyzing the axial strain temporal curves of rock bolts, the response to the dynamic loads is different when rock bolts’ installing angles are different. The rock bolts of vault bear pressure at first and tension after., and the rock bolts in upright wall bear tension absolutely. The axial tension strain generates at these two positions. The comparison between the axial strain temporal curves and the corresponding curves is carried out in model test. These two curves are compatibility. This simulation provides the references of arrangement methods in wall rock of tunnels reinforced by rock bolts under the effect of dynamic loads.

Key words: rock bolts, reinforcement effect, explosive wave, numerical analysis, mechanical characteristics

中图分类号:

TD 353

杨自友，顾金才，杨本水，陈安敏，徐景茂. 锚杆对围岩的加固效果和动载响应的数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2805-2809.

YANG Zi-you, GU Jin-cai, YANG Ben-shui, CHEN An-min, XU Jing-mao. Numerical analysis of reinforcement effects and response to dynamic loads characteristics of rock bolts[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2805-2809.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	史吏, 胡东东, 蔡袁强, 潘晓东, 孙宏磊, . 增压式真空预压吹填淤泥孔压实时响应及加固机制初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[2]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[3]	朱才辉, 崔晨, 兰开江, 东永强. 砖-土结构劣化及入侵建筑物拆除对榆林卫城稳定性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3153-3166.
[4]	冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[5]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[6]	吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王斌, 李玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[7]	李宁, 杨敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[8]	郑黎明, 张洋洋, 李子丰, 马平华, 阳鑫军, . 低频波动下考虑孔隙度与压力不同程度变化的岩土固结渗流分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1158-1168.
[9]	俞缙, 张欣, 蔡燕燕, 刘士雨, 涂兵雄, 傅国锋, . 水化学与冻融循环共同作用下砂岩细观损伤与力学性能劣化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 455-464.
[10]	陈建功, 陈晓东, . 基于小波函数的锚杆拉拔全过程分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4590-4596.
[11]	冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[12]	叶帅华, 赵壮福, 朱彦鹏, . 框架锚杆支护黄土边坡大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4240-4248.
[13]	沙飞, 李术才, 林春金, 刘人太, 张庆松, 杨磊, 李召峰. 砂土介质注浆渗透扩散试验与加固机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4259-4269.
[14]	丁潇, 谷拴成, 何晖, 张玉, . 单/多离层作用下锚杆受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4299-4305.
[15]	王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed