›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 559-564.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单锚类土质边坡锚固预应力传递规律的研究

赵晓彦1, 2,蒋楚生2,熊自英1   

  1. 1.西南交通大学 土木工程学院,成都 610031;2.中国中铁二院集团有限责任公司,成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2008-07-10 出版日期:2010-02-10 发布日期:2010-03-24
  • 作者简介:赵晓彦,男,1977年生,博士,副教授,主要从事边坡稳定性及其预加固方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护实验室开放基金项目(No. GZ2006-02);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 40772174)。

Study of transferring mode of prestressed force in singly anchored soil-like slopes

ZHAO Xiao-yan1, 2, JIANG Chu-sheng2, XIONG Zi-ying1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China; 2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2008-07-10 Online:2010-02-10 Published:2010-03-24

摘要:

在前人理论上推导的基础上,进一步计算了类土质边坡单锚预应力自坡面向坡体内的传递范围,计算了坡体内不同位置处的预应力传递系数,分析得出单锚预应力自坡面向坡体内传递的扩散角为39°左右、合理锚间距为3.2 m左右。以G323改造工程K617段花岗岩风化形成的类土质边坡为原型进行了离心模型试验,在坡体模型内不同位置埋设土压力盒,通过测读土压力盒的读数,得出预应力在坡体内不同位置处引起的土压力变化,间接得出预应力自坡面向坡体内的传递规律。离心模型试验得出的预应力传递规律与理论推导得出规律基本吻合,并得出了预应力传递系数与初始锚固预应力有关的结论,认为这主要是因为边坡岩土体产生塑性形变的结果。理论分析和离心模型试验均得出,锚固措施对近坡面处的浅层土体并无明显的加固作用,锚固边坡也必须进行坡面防护。

关键词: 单锚类土质边坡, 预应力, 传递规律

Abstract:

The transferring equation of the prestressed force from slope surface into slope body in singly anchored soil-like slope is deduced and discussed on the assumption that the slope body is elastomeric. The transferring coefficients of the prestressed force are put forward according to the transferring formula. The conclusions are drawn that the spreading angle of the prestressed force from slope surface into slope body in singly anchored slope is approximate 39º; and that the optimal space between anchors is about 3.2 m. Some centrifugal model tests are carried out according to a strongly weathered granite slope locating at K617 of G232 road. In the centrifugal model tests, earth pressure cells are set at different points of the slope body to monitor the increased earth pressures caused by the prestressed force. And then the transferring discipline of the prestressed force from slope surface into slope body can be brought out. The results drawn out from centrifugal model tests agree in the main with what from theoretical study. The coefficients of the prestressed force obtained from model tests are related to the amount of the prestressed force, while it is apart from the amount of the prestressed force in the theoretical study. The plastic deformations that occur in the model tests but not be considered in the theoretic study are the main reason. Both the theoretical study and the model tests result in that slope surface protection must be taken into consideration because the effect of the reinforcing is indistinctive in the surface layer of about 2 m.

Key words: singly anchored soil-like slope, prestressed force, transferring discipline

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2] 艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[3] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4] 秦伟, 戴国亮, 马李志, 裴铭海, 王磊, 朱光耀, 高博, . 珊瑚礁地层中PHC桩原位静载试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 381-389.
[5] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[6] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[7] 王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆 腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[8] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[9] 周 勇,令永强,杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[10] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[11] 周 芬,梁 强,杜运兴. 单根无黏结预应力筋对加筋体力学性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2442-2450.
[12] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[13] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[14] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
[15] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 李元亨,陈国良,刘修国,尚建嘎. 主TIN模式下面向拓扑的三维地质块体构建方法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1902 -1906 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 石 崇 ,徐卫亚 ,张 玉 ,李德亮 ,刘 和. 基于元胞自动机模型的堆积体动力学参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1795 -1800 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .