预应力锚固抗滑桩内力计算的加权残值法

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 896-902.

预应力锚固抗滑桩内力计算的加权残值法

陈昌富¹，肖淑君^{1, 2}

1. 湖南大学岩土工程研究所，长沙 410082；2. 广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院岩土研究所，广州 510060

收稿日期:2008-10-28 出版日期:2010-03-10 发布日期:2010-03-31
作者简介:陈昌富，男，1963年生，博士，副所长，主要从事边坡及支挡结构，地基处理方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No. 50878082)；交通部西部项目(No. 200631880237)。

Stress calculation of prestressed anchor anti-slide pile based on weighted residual method

CHEN Chang-fu¹，XIAO Shu-jun ^{1, 2}

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute, Guangzhou 510060, China

Received:2008-10-28 Online:2010-03-10 Published:2010-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

总结了预应力锚索抗滑桩锚索设计拉力和预应力的计算方法并进行了改进，使得各方法均能考虑锚索与桩体的位移协调。针对桩顶和桩身作用锚索的各种情形，将半解析、半数值的加权残值法应用于预应力锚索抗滑桩的内力计算，并采用适用性较广的B样条函数作为试函数，在此基础上编制了可考虑滑动面以上桩前土体抗力计算程序，将该程序应用于已有实例的分析，并与有限差分法进行对比，验证了程序的正确性，将该方法应用于其他两个计算实例的分析，针对锚索设计拉力和预应力的不同计算方法，分别给出了相应的锚索设计拉力、预应力、桩身最大弯矩和桩顶位移的对比分析表格，以及桩身受力图，计算结果还表明，对于特定计算实例不是所有计算方法都适用，要具体问题具体分析。

关键词: 抗滑桩, 预应力锚索, 位移协调, 加权残值法, 受力分析

Abstract:

The design tensile and prestressing force calculation method of anti-slides pile with prestressed cables are summarized and improved, which makes the methods consider displacement coordination of pestressed cable and pile. According to each case of prestressed cable acting on pile top and pile body, the semi-analytic and semi-numerical weighted residual method is applied to stress calculation of anti-slides pile with prestressed cables; and the extensively adapted B-spline function is used as trial function; then the calculation program is worked out; and the program can consider soil resistance above sliding surface in front of pile. The program is applied to analyze existing example; and its result is compared with the result obtained by finite difference method; the reliability of the method is proved. Simultaneously, the proposed method is applied to another two calculation examples; aiming at different calculation methods of anchor design tensible and prestressing force, the comparative analysis table with relevant design tensible force, prestressing force, maximum bending moment of pile body and pile top displacement is presented respectively; pile force diagram is given; and the calculation also shows that it is not every method suitable for specific calculation example; and it must take concrete analysis of concrete issue.

Key words: anti-slide pile, prestressed anchor, displacement compatibility, weighted residual method, stress analysis

中图分类号:

TU 473

陈昌富，肖淑君. 预应力锚固抗滑桩内力计算的加权残值法[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 896-902.

CHEN Chang-fu，XIAO Shu-jun. Stress calculation of prestressed anchor anti-slide pile based on weighted residual method[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 896-902.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2]	孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[3]	陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[4]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[5]	魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[6]	李宁, 杨敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[7]	张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[8]	雷达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
[9]	马显春, 罗刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[10]	严敏嘉，夏元友，刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[11]	刘永权，刘新荣，谢应坤，余瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[12]	毛坚强，徐骏，杨磊，. 滑体段采用m法模型的抗滑桩计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1197-1202.
[13]	张建海，王仁坤，周钟，郑路，张茹，谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[14]	储召军，石少卿，孙建虎，李季，崔廉明,. 基于模型试验的桩间距对组合式钢管抗滑桩抗滑效果的影响分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 848-853.
[15]	郑桐，刘红帅，袁晓铭，涂杰文，汤爱平，齐文浩,. 悬臂抗滑桩静、动力学性能试验的全过程[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 854-862.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed