›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1168-1172.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

垃圾填埋场稳定影响因素敏感性神经网络分析

涂 帆1,崔广强2,林从谋1,肖朝昀1   

  1. 1.华侨大学 土木工程学院,泉州 362021;2.福建农林大学 金山学院,福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2008-10-20 出版日期:2010-04-10 发布日期:2010-04-30
  • 作者简介:涂帆,女,1950年生,教授,主要从事地基基础与环境岩土工程的教学与研究。
  • 基金资助:

    福建省自然科学基金计划资助项目(基金项目编号:E0710019);福建省自然科学基金计划资助项目(2009J05126);厦门市科技局项目(3502Z20083042)。

Sensibility analysis of factors aeffecting stability of waste landfill based on neural network

TU Fan1, CUI Guangqiang 2,LIN Congmou1, XIAO Zhaoyun1   

  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 62021, China; 2.College of Jinshan, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
  • Received:2008-10-20 Online:2010-04-10 Published:2010-04-30

摘要:

垃圾填埋场稳定影响因素的选取和研究是稳定分析的重要组成部分,而确定主次要因素的方法就是进行影响因素敏感性分析。利用BP神经网络结合正交试验设计方法,对填埋场沿衬里滑移破坏的影响因素进行敏感性分析。通过对工程实例的计算,该方法与传统法有着相同的因素敏感性排序,但决定排序的极差值有所不同。由于该法能考虑多因素同时变化,故其极差值的大小更能反映因素敏感程度的差异。BP神经网络结合正交试验设计法与传统法相比能节省计算工作量。研究结果显示,影响填埋场滑移稳定性的最主要参数为复合衬垫层间最小摩擦角和垃圾的堆填坡角。因素敏感性排序的确定为填埋场的优化设计、施工、试验、运营管理提供了理论依据。

关键词: 垃圾填埋场稳定性, 敏感性分析, BP神经网络, 正交设计

Abstract:

The selection and research of stability influence factors are very important for stability analysis of solid waste landfills. The sensibility analysis is a method to identify the importance of the factors. In the traditional method of sensibility analysis, only the results caused by changing single affecting factor are considered. Therefore, it is difficult to reveal the real picture of the multi factors simultaneously changed in real case. A method of BP artificial neural network combined with the orthogonal design is presented to study the sensibility of influence factors on translational failure of landfill along the liner system. The comparison between the new and traditional methods is conducted by analyzing a real project. It shows that the sequences of factor sensibility are the same but the maximum difference of safety factors for an influence factor used to determine the sequences are different. The maximum difference of safety factors in the new method are more accurate to reflect the differences of sensibility of the factors because several factors simultaneously changed are considered. In addition, the computing and working time for using the new method is much less than for using the traditional method. The results of sensibility analysis indicate that the major factors to impact landfill stability against translational failure include the smallest interface friction angle in the composite liner and the waste filling slope angle. The results of sensibility analysis can be used to optimize the design, construction, monitoring, and operation management for solid waste landfills.

Key words: stability of waste landfill, sensibility analysis, BP neural network, orthogonal design

[1] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 刘娜, 胡明, . 海量监测数据下分布式BP神经网络区域 滑坡空间预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2866-2872.
[2] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[3] 陈卫忠,马永尚,于洪丹,龚 哲,李香玲,. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
[4] 张永杰,夏旖琪,冯夏庭,王桂尧,. 陡坡段双桩-柱基础简化计算方法及影响因素分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1705-1715.
[5] 杨海朋,白 冰,聂庆科, . 基于多元统计的竖井井壁安全评价模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 27-34.
[6] 胡 军,董建华 ,王凯凯 ,黄贵臣,. 边坡稳定性的CPSO-BP模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 577-582.
[7] 王开禾,罗先启,沈 辉,张海涛. 围岩力学参数反演的GSA-BP神经网络模型及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 631-638.
[8] 邹 飞,龙万学,李 亮,. 楔形刀具侵入岩石损伤破坏影响因素的理论分析及数值模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2101-2108.
[9] 谌文武,毕 骏,马亚维,刘 伟,江 耀, . MK模型的拟合方程和预测方程在土-水特征曲线中的应用及参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3208-3214.
[10] 史小萌,刘保国,亓 轶. 水泥石膏胶结相似材料在固-流耦合试验中的适用性[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2624-2630.
[11] 史小萌 ,刘保国 ,肖 杰,. 水泥和石膏胶结相似材料配比的确定方法[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1357-1362.
[12] 雷 勇,刘 泽. 基于H-B准则的公路桥梁桩基嵌岩深度计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 457-462.
[13] 宋卫东 ,曹 帅 ,付建新 ,江国建 ,吴 锋,. 矿柱稳定性影响因素敏感性分析及其应用研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 271-277.
[14] 李美蓉 ,陈 媛 ,张 林 ,杨宝全 , . 复杂地质条件下多结构面对重力坝坝基稳定性的影响及处理[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 328-333.
[15] 马 非 ,贾善坡,. 泥岩巷道围岩弹塑性参数反演分析与长期稳定性预测[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1987-1994.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 毛 宁,张尧亮. 经验公式简便求法典型实例[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2978 -2982 .
[5] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[6] 李伟华,赵成刚,杜楠馨. 软弱饱和土夹层对地铁车站地震响应的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3958 -3963 .
[7] 韩现民. 西格二线关角隧道浅埋砂层段施工技术及力学效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 297 -302 .
[8] 蒋臻蔚,彭建兵,王启耀. 西安市地铁3号线不良地质问题及对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[9] 刘用海,朱向荣,常林越. 基于Casagrande法数学分析确定先期固结压力[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[10] 祝 磊,洪宝宁. 粉状煤系土的物理力学特性[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1317 -1322 .