邻近既有隧道的新建大断面隧道施工参数优化分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1217-1226.

邻近既有隧道的新建大断面隧道施工参数优化分析

杨永波^{1, 2}，刘明贵¹，张国华¹，李祺^{1, 2}

1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所，武汉 430071；2.武汉中科智创岩土技术有限公司，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2009-03-03 出版日期:2010-04-10 发布日期:2010-04-30
基金资助:
杨永波，男，1978年生，博士生，主要从事岩土工程监测、检测理论及方法方面的研究工作。

Analysis of construction parameter optimization for new large cross-section tunnel next to existing tunnels

YANG Yong-bo ^{1, 2}, LIU Ming-gui¹, ZHANG Guo-hua1, LI Qi ^{1, 2}

1.Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2.Wuhan RSM Intelligence Geotechnique Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2009-03-03 Online:2010-04-10 Published:2010-04-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

结合大帽山隧道Ⅴ级围岩段施工参数优化的试验，通过爆破震动速度、岩体声波波速和围岩内部位移的现场监控量测工作，研究既有隧道旁新建大断面隧道双侧壁导坑法施工时岩体的损伤程度和范围，进而优化导洞的单循环进尺、爆破参数等施工参数。研究表明：推进式往复爆破作业的双侧壁导坑法开挖的隧道必然导致围岩产生一定程度的损伤、破坏，尤其是小净距隧道间的中夹岩岩墙；双侧壁导坑法开挖的大断面隧道，控制岩体的损伤程度和损伤范围是相互矛盾的，通过减少单循环开挖进尺来减少爆破震动速度，只能控制岩体的损伤范围，多次的重复爆破导致损伤岩体的损伤程度更大，极大影响围岩稳定；相反，通过适当加大单循环开挖进尺来控制损伤程度的同时，过大的爆破震动速度导致损伤范围更大，极大影响邻近既有隧道的安全运行。利用现场监测数据，通过在UDEC软件中实现的岩体各向异性爆破损伤模型，计算导洞推进式开挖全过程围岩压力的变化和既有隧道支护结构的状态，综合考虑各种因素，优化得到折中的单循环进尺。

关键词: 既有隧道, 大断面隧道, 双侧壁导坑, 施工参数, 累计损伤, 数值模拟

Abstract:

Based on the construction parameter optimization test of class Ⅴ surrounding rock of Damaoshan Tunnel, through the on-site monitoring work of blasting vibration velocity, acoustic wave velocity of rock mass and internal displacements of surrounding rock, the damage extent and scope of rock mass of a new large cross-section tunnel constructed by double side-wall heading excavation method next to existing tunnel was studied; and then the construction parameters such as single-cycle footage of pilot tunnel ,blasting parameters and so on were optimized. It is shown that the surrounding rock of the tunnel constructed by double side-wall heading excavation method would unavoidably be damaged in a certain degree because of repeating blasting, especially the interlaid rock wall in tunnel groups with closely-spaced. In construction of large cross-section tunnel with double side-wall heading excavation method, it is contradictory to control both damage extent and damage scope. By reducing the single-cycle footage to reduce the blasting velocity, it could only control the damage scope, however, repeated blasting would lead to a greater damage extent, greatly affecting the stability of surrounding rock. On the contrary, through appropriate increasing of the single-cycle footage to control the damage extent, the excessive blasting vibration velocity would lead to greater damage scopes, which greatly affect the safe operation of existing tunnel. Basing on the monitoring result, Therefore, in engineering practices, we should weigh the advantage and disadvantage of both solutions according to the characteristics of the actual project and to determine an optimal compromise. The research method and analysis method of this study could provide reference for the design, construction, monitoring of tunnel project under similar conditions and further theoretical research.

Key words: existing tunnel, large cross-section tunnel, double side-wall heading excavation method, construction parameter, accumulative damage, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

O 319.56

杨永波，刘明贵1，张国华，李祺. 邻近既有隧道的新建大断面隧道施工参数优化分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1217-1226.

YANG Yong-bo, LIU Ming-gui, ZHANG Guo-hua, LI Qi. Analysis of construction parameter optimization for new large cross-section tunnel next to existing tunnels[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1217-1226.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[5]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[6]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[7]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[8]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[9]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[10]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[11]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[12]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[13]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.
[14]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[15]	李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张彬, 张嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed