›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 2141-2145.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

测定非饱和土土-水特征曲线的溢出水校正称量法

陈 辉1, 2,韦昌富1,李 幻1,曹华峰1,吴二林1   

  1. 1.中国科学院岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,武汉 430071;2.江西蓝天学院,南昌 330098
  • 收稿日期:2009-09-03 出版日期:2010-07-10 发布日期:2010-07-19
  • 作者简介:陈辉,男,1980年生,博士研究生,主要从事非饱和土非平衡流动及污染物迁移方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所领域前沿基础研究基金资助项目(No. Q110605);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 10872211);岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室重点项目;中国科学院百人计划择优支持项目。

A modified weighing-outflow method for measuring soil-water characteristic curve of unsaturated soils

CHEN Hui1, 2, WEI Chang-fu1, LI Huan1, CAO Hua-feng1, WU Er-lin1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China ; 2. Jiangxi Bluesky University, Nanchang 330098, China
  • Received:2009-09-03 Online:2010-07-10 Published:2010-07-19

摘要:

在利用压力板仪测定非饱和土的土-水特征曲线时,常用的取样称量法、溢出水称量法分别存在实测试样质量与实际试样质量不相等、实测排水量与实际排水量不相等等问题,从而造成试验结果失真。为此,溢出水校正称量法被引入用来消除取样称量法及溢出水称量法中存在的问题。通过取样称量法、溢出水称量法、溢出水校正称量法的对比研究发现,在同一基质吸力作用下,由取样称量法、溢出水称量法确定的试样饱和度均小于由溢出水校正称量法确定的试样饱和度,并对该现象进行了解释。随后,对取样称量法、溢出水称量法、溢出水校正称量法的适用范围进行了探讨。

关键词: 压力板仪, 土-水特征曲线, 取样称量法, 溢出水称量法, 溢出水校正称量法

Abstract:

Usually, two methods are adopted in using the pressure plate extractor, namely, including the weighing soil method(WSM), which measures the water content by weighing the soil sample when equilibrium is reached; and the weighing outflow method(WOM), which measures the water content by weighing the outflow from the soil sample after equilibrium is attained. In the measurement, however, there are some factors that can adversely influence testing results. For example, with the WSM, part of soil mass may lose, and in using the WOM, the outflow could be overestimated because the air-bubble accumulation and the air-water interface. All these factors may result in error. To resolve the problem, an adjusted method of weighing ouflow is introduced. By comparing the weighing soil method and the weighing outflow method to the adjusted method of weighing outflow, it is shown that at the same matric suction, the saturations determined with the weighing soil method and the weighing outflow method are less than that determined with the adjusted method of weighing outflow. The reasons for this are sought; and the applicabilities of these three methods are discussed.

Key words: pressure plate extractor, soil water characteristic curve, weighing soil method, weighing outflow method, adjusted weighing outflow method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.91
[1] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[2] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[3] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[4] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[5] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[6] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[7] 陶高梁,柏 亮,袁 波,甘世朝. 土-水特征曲线与核磁共振曲线的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 943-948.
[8] 黎澄生,孔令伟,柏 巍,安 然,李甜果, . 土-水特征曲线滞后阻塞模型[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 598-604.
[9] 刘星志,刘小文,陈 铭,谷明晗. 基于3个不等粒径颗粒接触模型的土-水特征曲线[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 651-656.
[10] 方瑾瑾,冯以鑫,邵生俊,. 真三轴条件下原状Q3黄土的土-水特征[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2597-2604.
[11] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[12] 黄启迪,赵成刚,蔡国庆,. 基于热力学并考虑体变及滞回效应的土-水特征曲线模型[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 1857-1867.
[13] 曹春山 ,吴树仁 ,潘 懋,梁昌玉,. 工程切坡诱发黄土滑坡成因机制研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1049-1060.
[14] 李顺群,贾红晶,王杏杏,桂 超,. 轴平移技术在基质吸力测控中的局限性和误差分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3089-3095.
[15] 谌文武,毕 骏,马亚维,刘 伟,江 耀, . MK模型的拟合方程和预测方程在土-水特征曲线中的应用及参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3208-3214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 李荣涛. 一种高温下混凝土化学塑性-损伤耦合本构模型[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1585 -1591 .
[3] 马文涛. 基于灰色最小二乘支持向量机的边坡位移预测[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1670 -1674 .
[4] 于琳琳,徐学燕,邱明国,闫自利,李鹏飞. 冻融作用对饱和粉质黏土抗剪性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2448 -2452 .
[5] 王协群,张有祥,邹维列,熊海帆. 降雨入渗条件下非饱和路堤变形与边坡的稳定数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3640 -3644 .
[6] 王 伟,刘必灯,周正华,王玉石,赵纪生. 刚度和阻尼频率相关的等效线性化方法[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3928 -3933 .
[7] 王海波,徐 明,宋二祥. 基于硬化土模型的小应变本构模型研究[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 39 -43 .
[8] 曹光栩,宋二祥,徐 明. 山区机场高填方地基工后沉降变形简化算法[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 1 -5 .
[9] 刘华丽 ,朱大勇 ,钱七虎 ,李宏伟. 边坡三维端部效应分析[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1905 -1909 .
[10] 刘年平 ,王宏图 ,袁志刚 ,刘竟成. 砂土液化预测的Fisher判别模型及应用[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 554 -557 .