›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (S1): 115-120.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道斜交穿越地裂缝的模型试验研究

李建军,邵生俊,熊田芳   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,西安 710048;2. 西安理工大学 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2010-02-20 出版日期:2010-08-10 发布日期:2010-09-09
  • 作者简介:李建军,男,1967年生,博士,高级工程师,从事岩土工程施工技术研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 50779054,No. 10872161);陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室基金项目(No. 00S901)。

Research on physical model experiment of tunnel obliquely crossing a ground fissure

LI Jian-jun,SHAO Sheng-jun,XIONG Tian-fang   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048 China
  • Received:2010-02-20 Online:2010-08-10 Published:2010-09-09

摘要:

西安地区由北向南间隔分布有十多条近东西走向的地裂缝,建设中的多条地铁线路与地裂缝呈斜交状态。为了揭示地铁隧道斜交穿越地裂缝时受地裂缝活动而产生的力学性状变化,采用50:1几何相似比尺的物理模型试验仪,在合理模拟围岩地层、衬砌结构、应力条件、地裂缝与洞轴线交角及其错动位移基础上,开展了斜交地裂缝活动条件下隧道衬砌结构与围岩相互作用的物理模型试验研究,并与正交地裂缝活动下的测试结果进行了对比分析。表明斜交地裂缝活动对地铁隧道的影响范围更大,各变形缝均有明显的沉降差发展;邻近斜交地裂缝的衬砌结构易处于“悬臂梁”受力状态,衬砌结构不均匀沉降使其产生旋转位移,围岩土压力变化使衬砌结构内力产生显著变化;随着地裂缝错动位移的发展,上盘内拱顶和下盘拱顶、拱底出现围岩作用的加强,而上盘拱底出现围岩作用的松弛。与隧道正交穿越地裂缝的情况比较,斜交穿越地裂缝时围岩土压力和衬砌结构内力变化更大,易出现拉裂破坏。

关键词: 地裂缝, 地铁隧道, 衬砌结构, 模型试验

Abstract:

Because of the upper soil mass relative moving to the lower soil mass beside the ground fissure, there is the complicated action mechanism between lining structure and wall rock of soil with fissures. For investigating the engineering behaviors of Xi’an metro tunnel crossing ground fissures widely distributing the Xi’an zone, the physical model experiment with geometric proportion of 50:1 is carried out by reasonably simulating the wall rock stratum with a oblique ground fissure, lining structure, stress conditions and dislocation displacement of ground fissures. In the physical model experiment, the angle between axial of tunnel and direction of fissure equals to 450, the additional vertical stress of wall rock soil equals to 50 kPa, 100 kPa and 150 kPa respectively; and the tunnel is simulated with the similar material. The pressure of wall rock, settlement and internal stress of lining structure are measured by the new earth pressure sensor, displacement transducer and strain sensor in the processor of movement of ground fissure, so that the mechanical characteristics of wall rock and lining structure are analyzed well and truly. Test results show that the oblique ground fissure gets a larger sphere of influence on metro tunnel; and the settlement of deformation joints is developing significantly. In addition, the lining obliquely crossing ground fissures is in a force state similar to "beam", which will produce a rotating shift with the uniform settlement of tunnel lining. As to the development of ground fissures’ dislocation displacement, internal forces of lining are changed significantly with the changing of wall rock pressure; and both of the wall rock pressure in the foot wall and the wall rock pressure at the top of lining in the hanging wall increase, while the wall rock pressure at the bottom of lining in the hanging wall decrease. Comparing with the situation of the tunnel orthogonally cross ground fissures, the wall rock pressure and the internal force of lining structure changed larger when the tunnel obliquely crossing the movement ground fissure; and the lining structure is more prone to tensile failure.

Key words: ground fissure, metro tunnel, lining structure, physical model experiment

中图分类号: 

  • U 451+.4
[1] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[4] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[5] 丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[6] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[7] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[8] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[9] 卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不 均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[10] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[11] 蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[12] 孙飞, 张志强, 易志伟. 正断层黏滑错动对地铁隧道结构影响 的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3037-3044.
[13] 周 辉, 郑 俊, 胡大伟, 张传庆, 卢景景, 高 阳, 张旺, . 碳酸性水环境下隧洞衬砌结构劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2469-2477.
[14] 詹良通, 胡英涛, 刘小川, 陈捷, 王瀚霖, 朱斌, 陈云敏. 非饱和黄土地基降雨入渗离心模型试验 及多物理量联合监测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.
[15] 周东, 刘汉龙, 仉文岗, 丁选明, 杨昌友, . 被动桩侧土体位移场的透明土模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2686-2694.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄志全,陈 宇,宋日英,宋丽娟. 三门峡地区黄土状粉质黏土非饱和性质试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1759 -1762 .
[2] 李元亨,陈国良,刘修国,尚建嘎. 主TIN模式下面向拓扑的三维地质块体构建方法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1902 -1906 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 何思明,吴 永,李新坡. 滚石冲击碰撞恢复系数研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 623 -627 .
[6] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .