锦屏一级高拱坝坝基加固效果分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 2861-2868.

锦屏一级高拱坝坝基加固效果分析

胡著秀¹，张建海¹，周钟²，饶宏玲²

1. 四川大学水力学及山区河流开发与保护国家重点实验室水电学院，成都 610065； 2. 中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院，成都 610072

收稿日期:2009-05-27 出版日期:2010-09-10 发布日期:2010-09-16
作者简介:胡著秀，女，1984年生，硕士研究生，从事岩土工程数值分析方面研究。

Analysis of stress and deformation of Jinping I High Arch Dam after foundation reinforcement

HU Zhu-xiu¹，ZHANG Jian-hai¹，ZHOU Zhong²，RAO Hong-ling²

1. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountainous River Engineering, School of Water Resources and Hydro-power, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; 2. Chengdu Hydroelectric Investigation and Design Institute, CHECC, Chengdu 610072, China

Received:2009-05-27 Online:2010-09-10 Published:2010-09-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

锦屏一级高拱坝复杂的坝址地质条件使基础加固处理工程巨大，主要包括左岸混凝土垫座置换、左岸传力硐、左岸f5、f8、煌斑岩脉混凝土网格置换，右岸f13、f14断层混凝土网格置换。采用非线性有限元分析方法，对坝基加固后锦屏一级水电站坝体在多种工况下的的应力、变形特性进行了计算分析，给出了坝体蓄水期的应力、位移分布及超载、降强对位移的影响结果，并与无垫座方案的相关数据进行对比，表明加固后坝体蓄水期总体变形规律明显改善，坝踵拉应力减小，坝体与坝基安全储备能力提高，满足设计要求；在应力、变形方面肯定了大规模加固措施的必要性。

关键词: 有限元法, 高拱坝, 变形, 应力, 锦屏一级水电站

Abstract:

The complex geological conditions in the site of Jinping I Arch Dam made its reinforcement measures a huge project ,which mainly includes the concrete seating replacement ,shearing resistant adit, with the fault f13, f14 in the right bank and fault f5 、f8 and lamprophyre veins in the left bank treated with concrete lattice replacement. By employing nonlinear finite element analysis, this article gives computing results and detailed discusses on the dam stress and deformation characteristics of Jinping I Arch Dam under several operation conditions after the dam foundation reinforced. The dam stress distribution and deformation are also discussed by way of strength reserve method and the water gravity overload method. The results show that during the inpounding period, the overall characteristics of deformation and stress distribution of the dam have been significantly improved; the tensile stresses in the heel of dam are decreased after reinforcement; and the dam has enough global stability storage to completely meet the design requirements. Thus the necessity of the concrete seating replacement is afirmed.

Key words: finite element method, high arch dam, dam stress and deformation, Jinping I Hydropower Staion

中图分类号:

TB 115

胡著秀，张建海，周钟，饶宏玲. 锦屏一级高拱坝坝基加固效果分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2861-2868.

HU Zhu-xiu，ZHANG Jian-hai，ZHOU Zhong，RAO Hong-ling. Analysis of stress and deformation of Jinping I High Arch Dam after foundation reinforcement[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2861-2868.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	宋义敏, 张悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[2]	陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
[3]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[4]	方瑾瑾, 冯以鑫, 王立平, 余永强, . 真三轴条件下非饱和黄土的有效应力屈服特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 492-500.
[5]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[6]	涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[7]	黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[8]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[9]	王龙, 朱俊高, 郭万里, 陆阳洋, . 无黏性土压缩模型及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 229-234.
[10]	艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[11]	王忠凯, 徐光黎. 盾构掘进、离开施工阶段对地表变形的影响范围及量化预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 285-294.
[12]	刘泉声, 罗慈友, 朱元广, 蒋景东, 刘鹤, 彭星新, 潘玉丛, . 流变应力恢复法压力传感器传感单元方位布设研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 336-341.
[13]	尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[14]	介玉新, 张延亿, 杨光华, . 土石料湿化变形计算方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 11-20.
[15]	彭守建, 郭世超, 许江, 郭臣业, 张超林, 贾立, . 采动诱导应力集中对顺层钻孔瓦斯抽采影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 99-108.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed