汶川8.0级地震液化震害及特征

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3549-3555.

汶川8.0级地震液化震害及特征

曹振中¹，侯龙清²，袁晓铭³，孙锐³，王维铭³，陈龙伟³

1. 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院，哈尔滨 150001；2. 东华理工大学土木工程系，江西抚州344000；3. 中国地震局工程力学研究所，哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2009-06-24 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
作者简介:曹振中，男，1982年生，在职博士研究生，主要从事岩土地震工程研究。
基金资助:
中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项（No. 2010B01）；公益性地震行业科研专项（No. 200708001）；国家科技部国际合作项目（No. 2009DFA71720）；国家自然科学基金重大研究计划（No. 90715017）。

Characteristics of liquefaction-induced damages during Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake

CAO Zhen-zhong¹，HOU Long-qing²，YUAN Xiao-ming³，SUN Rui³，WANG Wei-ming³，CHEN Long-wei³

1. Shool of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China; 2. Deportment of Civil Engineering, East China Institute of Technology, Fuzhou, Jiangxi 344000, China; 3. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China

Received:2009-06-24 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过现场详细地调查，归纳总结了汶川地震液化导致的工程震害的现象、分布、规律和特征。结果表明，此次地震液化震害现象显著，位于德阳地区的3个液化区域震害严重，都江堰地区、绵阳游仙区以及江油市区的3个液化区域震害中等，其他地区轻微，液化震害分布与液化分布有一定关系，但二者有所不同；液化场地上房屋均不同程度受损，其中结构性差的房屋会直接倒塌，设有圈梁、构造柱的房屋，液化也会导致其整体倾斜、下沉、开裂；学校液化震害具有典型性，部分校区大面积液化，地裂缝纵横，地基不均匀沉降严重，主体结构开裂、倾斜，功能丧失。这次液化震害具有3个显著特征：（1）只要液化出现的地方，震害均比周围重，没有减震现象；（2）Ⅵ度区不仅有液化现象，而且有明显的液化震害；（3）液化伴随地裂缝，是构成此次地震液化震害的主因。

关键词: 汶川地震, 液化, 震害, 分布, 特征

Abstract:

The distribution and characteristics of liquefaction-induced damages during Wenchuan Ms8.0 Earthquake in China were summarized in detail according to the wide and detailed field investigation. The analytical results are as follows. (1) The liquefaction phenomena are evident, involving thousands of Hundreds thousands square meter of farmland. (2) The liquefied sites distribution and the liquefaction-induced damage distribution are correlated but not the same. Comparison of the liquefaction phenomena, the 3 liquefaction-induced damage areas in Deyang are the most serious; Dujiangyan, Mianyang and Jiangyou districts are the secondly serious; and other areas are relatively light. (3) In the liquefied sites, the poor houses without any consideration of seismic resistant design collapsed, even the houses/buildings with collar beams and constructional columns subsided or tilted. (4) The liquefaction phenomena are typically severe in schools, generating ground fissures and causing buildings tilting, subsiding and cracking. Three obvious characteristics of the liquefaction-induced damage are: (i.) The liquefaction aggravates the structural damage and no shock absorption phenomenon has been observed. (ii.) In the regions of seismic intensity of VI (PGA less than 0.05g), liquefaction phenomena and liquefaction-induced damage were observed and quite remarkable. (iii.) The liquefaction generated ground fissures are the significant cause of liquefaction-induced damage.

Key words: Wenchuan earthquake, liquefaction, damage, distribution, characteristics

中图分类号:

TU 443

曹振中，侯龙清，袁晓铭，孙锐，王维铭，陈龙伟. 汶川8.0级地震液化震害及特征[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3549-3555.

CAO Zhen-zhong，HOU Long-qing，YUAN Xiao-ming，SUN Rui，WANG Wei-ming，CHEN Long. Characteristics of liquefaction-induced damages during Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3549-3555.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[2]	高峰, 曹善鹏, 熊信, 周科平, 朱龙胤, . 冻融循环作用下受荷青砂岩的脆性演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[3]	马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[4]	宋文成, 梁正召, . 承压水上开采倾斜底板破坏特征与突水危险性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 624-634.
[5]	魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[6]	侯公羽, 谢冰冰, 韩育琛, 胡涛, 李子祥, 杨兴昆, 周天赐, 肖海林, . 分布埋入式光纤与隧道衬砌耦合性能试验及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 714-726.
[7]	王峰, 张建清, . 考虑颗粒强度尺寸效应的原型堆石料破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 87-94.
[8]	熊辉, 杨丰, . 文克尔地基模型下液化土桩基水平振动响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 103-110.
[9]	张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[10]	郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[11]	蒋水华, 冯泽文, 刘贤, 姜清辉, 黄劲松, 周创兵. 基于自适应贝叶斯更新方法的岩土参数概率分布推断[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 325-335.
[12]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[13]	田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[14]	谈云志, 彭帆, 钱芳红, 孙德安, 明华军, . 石墨−膨润土缓冲材料的最优配置方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3387-3396.
[15]	许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed