水力和超载条件下锚固岩石边坡动态稳定性拟静力分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3585-3593.

水力和超载条件下锚固岩石边坡动态稳定性拟静力分析

罗强^{1, 2}，李亮¹，赵炼恒¹

1. 中南大学土木建筑学院，长沙 410075；2. 贵州省交通运输厅，贵阳 550003

收稿日期:2009-06-18 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
作者简介:罗强，男，1970年生，博士研究生，高级工程师，主要从事公路工程、岩土工程方面的研究。
基金资助:
西部交通建设科技项目(No. 2006318802111)；国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50878213)；中南大学优秀博士学位论文扶植项目(No.2008yb004)。

Quasi-static analysis of seismic stability of anchored rock slope under surcharge and water pressure conditions

LUO Qiang ^1,2，LI Liang¹，ZHAO Lian-heng¹

1. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China; 2. Department of Communications of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550003, China

Received:2009-06-18 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于极限平衡理论，综合考虑水力条件、坡顶超载、地震荷载效应和锚固效应对岩石边坡进行了全面的稳定性分析。计算给出了多影响因素条件下岩石边坡稳定性安全系数的表达式，并重点分析了几种相关参数组合对岩石边坡稳定性的影响。分析表明，坡顶张拉裂缝积水、地下水渗流作用、滑面出流缝被堵塞、地震影响效应不利于岩石边坡抗滑稳定性，而锚索锚固效应则对提高边坡抗滑稳定性有积极作用；坡顶张拉裂缝积水、滑面出流缝被堵塞、水平向地震影响效应都不利于岩石边坡抗倾覆稳定性，但锚索锚固效应、坡顶超载、与竖直方向地震效应则对提高边坡抗倾覆稳定性有益。最后针对工程实际，提出了相应的工程建议。

关键词: 岩石边坡, 动态稳定性分析, 极限平衡法, 拟静力分析, 水压力, 锚固, 超载, 安全系数

Abstract:

Based on the limit equilibrium method, a rounded analysis for rock slope have been undertaken, in which several influencing factors such as water pressure, surcharge, seismic loading and anchoring force have been taken into account. The safety factor expressions for rock slope stability subjected to the condition of many factors have been deduced. Parametric analysis has shown that depth of water in tension crack, groundwater seepage force, blocked outflow suture, seismic loading, surcharge have a disadvantage effect on the rock slope stability against sliding; but anchorage effect of anchor blots has a beneficial effect on the rock slope stability against sliding. Parametric analysis has also shown that depth of water in tension crack, blocked outflow suture, horizontal seismic loading have a disadvantage effect on the rock slope stability against overturning; but surcharge, anchorage effect of anchor blots and vertical seismic loading have a advantageous effect on the rock slope stability against overturning. Finally, the project proposals have been put forward according to the engineering practice.

Key words: rock slope, seismic stability analysis, limit equilibrium method, quasi-static analysis, water pressure, anchorage, surcharge, factor of safety

中图分类号:

TU 431

罗强，李亮，赵炼恒. 水力和超载条件下锚固岩石边坡动态稳定性拟静力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3585-3593.

LUO Qiang，LI Liang，ZHAO Lian-heng. Quasi-static analysis of seismic stability of anchored rock slope under surcharge and water pressure conditions[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3585-3593.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[2]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[3]	杨福见, 胡大伟, 田振保, 周辉, 卢景景, 罗宇杰, 桂树强, . 高静水压力压实作用下疏松砂岩渗透特性演化及其机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 67-77.
[4]	于丽, 吕城, 段儒禹, 王明年, . 考虑孔隙水压力及非线性Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则下浅埋土质隧道三维塌落机制的上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 194-204.
[5]	肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[6]	张海娜, 陈从新, 郑允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[7]	张治国, 黄茂松, 杨轩, . 基于衬砌长期渗漏水影响的隧道施工扰动诱发超孔隙水压消散及地层固结沉降解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3135-3144.
[8]	蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[9]	言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[10]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[11]	崔凯, 黄井镜, 谌文武, 王东华, 韩宁, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址锚固浆液选型和性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[12]	黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[13]	吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[14]	贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[15]	李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed