层状岩质边坡遍布节理模型的三维稳定性分析

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 712-716.

层状岩质边坡遍布节理模型的三维稳定性分析

蒋青青¹，胡毅夫¹，赖伟明²

1.中南大学资源与安全工程学院，长沙 410083；2.中南大学土木建筑学院，长沙 410075

收稿日期:2007-10-13 出版日期:2009-03-10 发布日期:2011-01-28
作者简介:蒋青青，女，1956年生，副教授，硕士生导师。主要从事结构和岩土力学等方面的教学和研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大项目（No. 50490270）。

Three-dimensional stability analysis of stratified rock slope based on ubiquitous-joint model

JIANG Qing-qing¹, HU Yi-fu¹, LAI Wei-ming²

1. School of Resources & Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Received:2007-10-13 Online:2009-03-10 Published:2011-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用遍布节理模型（ubiquitous-joint模型）描述层状岩体的各向异性特征，并探讨ubiquitous-joint准则中安全系数的计算方法，利用FLAC3D分析层理倾角、倾向与边坡稳定性之间的关系，结果表明：（1）对于顺层边坡，当岩层倾向与坡面倾向的夹角较小时，边坡的安全系数随层理倾角的增大呈现先减小后增大再减小的趋势； 20°～30°时，安全系数得到最小值， 60°时安全系数得到最大值；不同破坏型式导致安全系数变化规律之间的差异；当较大时，曲线从先减小后增大的趋势转变为不断增大的趋势；根据的大小将顺层边坡分为两类：当 45°时，为严格顺层边坡；当45° 90°时，为斜向层状边坡。（2）对于逆层边坡，当 45°时，曲线呈现先增大再减小然后又增大的趋势，各曲线随的变化程度基本相同；但减小过程中，随着的增大，曲线的斜率逐渐减小，边坡稳定性的各向异性程度减小；当 45°时，曲线随的增大呈现非线性单调递增的趋势。（3）安全系数与之间的关系表明，对于顺层坡，随着的增大，边坡安全系数逐渐增大；对于逆层坡，当较小时( 150°)，边坡安全系数随的增大而逐渐减小；随着的增大( 120°)，边坡安全系数与呈现递增关系。

关键词: 遍布节理, 三维稳定性, 强度折减, 层状岩质边坡

Abstract:

The anisotropic characteristics of stratified rock mass are described by ubiquitous-joint model; the calculation method of safety factor based on ubiquitous-joint model is proposed; then the relationships between stratification dip angle , inclination and slope stability are analyzed by FLAC3D. The results show that (1) for bedding rock slope, when the angle between inclination of slope and rock stratum is small, the slope safety factor decreases, increases and then decreases with the increase of ; when 20－30°, the safety factor reaches the minimum value; while 60°, it reaches maximum value; different failure modes cause the variations of safety factor; when is large, the relationship curve shows the decrease then increase trend to gradually increase; according to the value of , the stratified rock slope can be divided into two types: 45° for strict bedding rock slope; 45° 90°for oblique stratified slope; (2) for reverse layered slope, when 45°, the relationship curve shows the trend of increase, decrease and then increase; the variation degree of each curve is almost the same with the variations of ; during decrease process, the slope of curve decreases gradually with the increase of , and the anisotropic characteristics of slope safety factor become small; when 45°, the relationship curve shows the trend of monotone increasing in nonlinear form; (3) the relationship between slope safety factor and shows that for bedding rock slope, the safety factor increases with the increase of ; for reverse layered slope, when is small ( 150°), the slope safety factor decreases with the increase of ; and with the increase of ( 120°), the slope safety factor increases while increases.

Key words: ubiquitous-joint model, three-dimensional stability, strength reduction, stratified rock slope

中图分类号:

TU 457

蒋青青，胡毅夫，赖伟明. 层状岩质边坡遍布节理模型的三维稳定性分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 712-716.

JIANG Qing-qing, HU Yi-fu, LAI Wei-ming. Three-dimensional stability analysis of stratified rock slope based on ubiquitous-joint model[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 712-716.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2]	聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[3]	王珍, 曹兰柱, 王东, . 非均质边坡稳定性上限分析评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 737-742.
[4]	任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[5]	朱彦鹏，杨晓宇，马孝瑞，杨校辉，叶帅华, . 边坡稳定性分析双折减法的几个问题[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 331-338.
[6]	涂义亮，刘新荣，钟祖良，杜立兵，王鹏, . 三类边坡失稳判据的统一性[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 173-180.
[7]	郑刚，聂东清，刁钰，程雪松,. 基坑多级支护破坏模式研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 313-322.
[8]	刘路路，宋亮，焦玉勇，王浩，张秀丽，谢壁婷, . 库水位波动条件下黄土坡临江1#崩滑堆积体稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 359-366.
[9]	程恒，傅志浩，张国新，杨波，江晨芳,. 五嘎冲拱坝坝肩加固效果分析及整体安全度评价[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 374-380.
[10]	王金梅，张迎宾，赵兴权，余鹏程，王潘，侯瑞彬，黄小福，魏涛,. 用点接触模拟滑面的滑坡稳定性分析方法[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2746-2756.
[11]	聂治豹，郑宏，张谭. 基于强度折减法确定边坡临界滑面的小波变换法[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1827-1831.
[12]	张锟，徐青，王一凡，阿湖宝. 自适应差分进化算法在边坡滑面搜索中的应用[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1503-1509.
[13]	闫超，刘松玉，邓永锋, . 一种基于强度折减法的刚性桩复合地基整体稳定性评价方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 875-882.
[14]	许胜才，张信贵，马福荣，陈子兴, . 水泥土桩加固边坡变形破坏特性及模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3187-3196.
[15]	张玉成，杨光华，张有祥，钟志辉，胡海英,. 古滑坡滑带土的力学特性与库水位变化对其稳定性影响及加固措施[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 43-52.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed