降雨作用下煤系土路堑边坡稳定分析

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 1035-1040.

降雨作用下煤系土路堑边坡稳定分析

祝磊^{1, 2}，洪宝宁^{1, 2}

1. 河海大学岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室，南京 210098；2. 河海大学岩土工程科学研究所，南京 210098

收稿日期:2007-09-26 出版日期:2009-04-10 发布日期:2011-01-30
作者简介:祝磊，男，1976年生，博士研究生，主要从事软基监控和岩土工程数值计算方面的研究。

Stability analysis of coal measure soil slope under rainfall infiltration

ZHU Lei ^1,2，HONG Bao-ning ^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Education Ministry, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China； 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China

Received:2007-09-26 Online:2009-04-10 Published:2011-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于掌握的降雨气象资料，利用非饱和瞬态渗流有限元程序对开挖后和风化后两种情况下的煤系土路堑边坡进行了降雨入渗坡体渗流场数值计算和分析。依据非饱和土力学强度理论，基于Morgenstern-Price方法，调用不同降雨时间的渗流计算结果，对两种情况下煤系土路堑边坡的瞬态稳定性进行了计算和分析。研究结果表明，水分在风化煤系土路堑边坡体内的渗透迁移对路堑边坡稳定性和最危险滑动面有时空影响；在煤系土路堑边坡降雨入渗和稳定性分析中考虑风化层较为合理。

关键词: 煤系土, 降雨, 渗流, 滑坡, 瞬态稳定性

Abstract:

With the FEM program of transient unsaturated seepage calculation, the seepage field of coal measure soil slope after excavating and weathering affected by the infiltration process of rainfall is simulated and analyzed according to the monitor ed daily rainfall data in July. Then, based on Morgenstern-Price method, the transient safety factor of coal measure soil slope is computed and analyzed by means of unsaturated soil strength theory and calling seepage results at different rainfall times. The results obtained show that the dangerous slip surface of the slope and its relative safety factor is affected and vibrated with water in different parts of the slope, meanwhile; rainfall infiltration and stability analysis considering weathered layer is more reasonable in coal measure soil slope.

Key words: coal measure soil, rainfall, seepage, landslide, transient stability

中图分类号:

TD 824.7

祝磊，洪宝宁. 降雨作用下煤系土路堑边坡稳定分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1035-1040.

ZHU Lei，HONG Bao-ning. Stability analysis of coal measure soil slope under rainfall infiltration[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1035-1040.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[2]	陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3]	刘成禹, 陈博文, 罗洪林, 阮家椿, . 满流条件下管道破损诱发渗流侵蚀的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 1-10.
[4]	刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[5]	夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱鑫, 桂洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[6]	于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[7]	支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[8]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[9]	刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[10]	陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[11]	许江, 邬君宇, 刘义鑫, 雷娇, . 不同充填度下岩体剪切−渗流耦合试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3416-3424.
[12]	刘伟俊, 张晋勋, 单仁亮, 杨昊, 梁辰, . 渗流作用下北京砂卵石地层多排管局部水平冻结体温度场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3425-3434.
[13]	黄晓虎, 雷德鑫, 夏俊宝, 易武, 张鹏, . 降雨诱发滑坡阶跃型变形的预测分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3585-3592.
[14]	李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[15]	邓茂林, 易庆林, 韩蓓, 周剑, 李卓骏, 张富灵, . 长江三峡库区木鱼包滑坡地表变形规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed