秦岭公路隧道通风竖井岩爆预测和防治措施

›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 1759-1763.

秦岭公路隧道通风竖井岩爆预测和防治措施

徐士良^{1, 2，}朱合华¹，丁文其¹，刘宝许³

1. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092； 2. 安徽建筑工业学院岩土工程系，合肥 230022；3. 中交隧道工程局有限公司，北京 100011

收稿日期:2008-08-05 出版日期:2009-06-10 发布日期:2011-03-09
作者简介:徐士良，男，1972年生，博士研究生，讲师，主要从事岩土工程方面的教学和研究工作。

Rock burst prediction for ventilation shaft of Qinling highway tunnel and its countermeasures

XU Shi-liang ^{1, 2}，ZHU He-hua¹，DING Wen-qi¹，LIU Bao-xu³

1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092，China；2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering，Anhui Institute of Architecture and Industry，Hefei 230022, China; 3. CCCC Tunnel Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China

Received:2008-08-05 Online:2009-06-10 Published:2011-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

秦岭公路隧道2号通风竖井，为国内乃至世界公路隧道规模最大的竖井工程。根据工程地质资料分析，岩爆是该竖井施工过程中的主要难题。为了从岩性角度评价竖井围岩的岩爆倾向性，开展了室内岩石单轴压缩变形试验和物理模型试验，根据改进脆性指数指标和模型试验的结果，表明竖井围岩有岩爆倾向性，必须加强岩爆预测和防治。根据水压致裂法的地应力测试结果和地应力分布特点，采用三维有限元回归分析反演了竖井工程区域的初始应力场。根据竖井围岩地应力场和Kirsch解得到的围岩二次应力场，结合Russenes和陶振宇岩爆判据，进行了竖井岩爆综合预测和分析，得出竖井有轻微和中等岩爆发生的结论，并提出岩爆防治措施。

关键词: 隧道工程, 通风竖井, 岩爆预测, 地应力, 有限元

Abstract:

No.2 ventilation shaft of Qinling highway tunnel is one of the largest ventilation shafts in the highway tunnel field at home and abroad. Rock burst is a serious problem during the shaft excavation according to the analysis of in-situ engineering geological data. For evaluating rock burst tendency from the perspective of lithological character, the uniaxial compression deformation test and physical model test are carried out. There is a high tendency of rock burst in surrounding rock by analyzing the modified brittleness index and model test result, so it is essential to strengthen rock burst prediction and control. The initial stress field of surrounding rocks of shaft is regressively analyzed by 3D finite element method according to in-situ measured data by hydro-fracturing and distribution properties of in-situ stress. Then the comprehensive rock burst prediction and analysis based on Russenes and Tao criteria are made according to the induced stress field obtained by Kirsch solutions and in-situ stress distribution of surrounding rock of shaft respectively. The result shows that the weak and moderate rock burst will occur during shaft excavation. Finally, some countermeasures to rock burst are proposed. It provides valuable references for other projects.

Key words: tunnel engineering, ventilation shaft, rock burst prediction, in-situ stress, finite element method

中图分类号:

U 459.2

徐士良，朱合华，丁文其，刘宝许. 秦岭公路隧道通风竖井岩爆预测和防治措施[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1759-1763.

XU Shi-liang，ZHU He-hua，DING Wen-qi，LIU Bao-xu. Rock burst prediction for ventilation shaft of Qinling highway tunnel and its countermeasures[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1759-1763.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[2]	刘波, 马永君, 盛海龙, 常雅儒, 于俊杰, 贾帅龙, . 白垩系红砂岩冻结融化后的力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 161-171.
[3]	叶观宝, 郑文强, 张振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[4]	王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[5]	严健, 何川, 晏启祥, 许金华. 雀儿山隧道冰碛地层冻胀力原位测试及计算分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3593-3602.
[6]	赵密, 欧阳文龙, 黄景琦, 杜修力, 赵旭, . P波作用下跨断层隧道轴线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[7]	陈卫忠, 田云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[8]	张海廷, 杨林青, 郭芳, . 基于SBFEM的层状地基埋置管道动力响应求解与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[9]	曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[10]	王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[11]	周小文, 程力, 周密, 王齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[12]	于正, 杨龙才, 张勇, 赵伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[13]	严健, 何川, 汪波, 蒙伟, . 高地温对隧道岩爆发生的影响性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[14]	梅慧浩, 冷伍明, 聂如松, 刘文劼, 伍晓伟, . 重载铁路路基面动应力峰值随机分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1603-1613.
[15]	吴顺川, 马骏, 程业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed