›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 2477-2482.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑饱和-非饱和渗流的土坡极限分析

牛文杰1-3,叶为民2, 3,刘绍刚4,禹海涛2, 3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 水工结构及环境工程研究所,杭州 310058;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;4. 同济大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2002-11-27 出版日期:2009-08-10 发布日期:2011-03-14
  • 作者简介:牛文杰,男,1982年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。

Limit analysis of a soil slope considering saturated-unsaturated seepage

NIU Wen-jie 1-3,YE Wei-min 2, 3,LIU Shao-gang4,YU Hai-tao 2, 3   

  1. 1. Institute of Hydraulic Structure and Environment Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2002-11-27 Online:2009-08-10 Published:2011-03-14

摘要:

给出了均质土坝的下游坝坡的安全系数的计算方法。均质土坝的下游坝坡有可能会通过滑裂面发生破坏。土坝中的土坡通常处于非饱和状态。非饱和土坡的安全系数计算需要考虑吸力对抗剪强度的贡献以及土坡中的非饱和渗流。给出处于饱和-非饱和渗流状态下的土坡的安全系数,有助于评价均质土坝的安全系数。下游坝坡的安全系数计算方法有:极限平衡法、上限解法和下限解法,该算法适用于非饱和土坡,且是在饱和土坡安全系数的计算方法上修正得到的。算例中非饱和土坡安全系数的计算考虑了吸力对抗剪强度的贡献。考虑非饱和渗流理论的土坡安全系数计算方法通常更加接近现场实际情况,并且对于同一坝坡,考虑非饱和渗流计算出的土坡安全系数要比饱和渗流理论计算出的安全系数大。

关键词: 饱和-非饱和渗流, 土坡, 极限分析, 安全系数, 均质土坝

Abstract:

This computing method addresses safety factor with respect to unsaturated slope of downstream homogeneous earth dam. Method to calculate safety factor of unsaturated slope is highly connected with shear strength criteria of unsaturated soil and seepage analysis of unsaturated slope. There is a potential risk for the soil slope of a downstream earth dam to burst along the sliding surface. Most slopes in earth dams are in unsaturated state. This computing method is intended to provide safety factor of a soil slope in saturated-unsaturated seepage. Determining the safety factor of a slope provides information to facilitate the safety assessment of a homogeneous earth dam. This computing method covers a procedure for determining safety factor of unsaturated slope of a downstream earth dam with limit equilibrium method, lower-bound and upper-bound method. This computing method is suitable for unsaturated slope. It is revised on the method to evaluate the safety factor of a saturated soil slope. The contribution of suction to the shear strength of unsaturated soil has been considered. In an example, safety factor of a soil slope is calculated in saturated seepage theory or saturated-unsaturated seepage theory. It is found that the safety factor of a slope considered the saturated-unsaturated seepage in a slope and the suction contribution to shear strength is larger than the one only considers the saturated seepage of a slope.

Key words: saturated-unsaturated seepage, soil slope, limit analysis, safety factor, homogeneous earth dam

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[2] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[3] 陈建功, 李 会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[4] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[5] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[6] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[7] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[8] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[9] 冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[10] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[11] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[12] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[13] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[14] 徐 鹏,蒋关鲁,邱俊杰,林展展,王智猛,. 基于二楔块法的加筋土挡墙屈服加速度及破坏模式极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2765-2770.
[15] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周火垚,施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3291 -3296 .
[2] 马少坤,黄茂松,扈 萍,秦会来. 吸力强度修正对数模型在地基承载力中的应用[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1853 -1857 .
[3] 董 云,何卫忠,孙 蔚. 隔堤填筑路堤的稳定性及变形破坏模式分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2471 -2478 .
[4] 叶 斌,叶冠林,长屋淳一. 采用土工合成材料的新型护岸结构的动态数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 442 -446 .
[5] 石 崇,徐卫亚,周家文,张金龙. 节理面透射模型及其隔振性能研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 729 -734 .
[6] 庞大鹏,陈剑平,王丹微. 节理网络分形在隧道超前地质预报中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1415 -1420 .
[7] 杨荣伟,程晓辉. 光弹颗粒材料的直剪实验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 103 -109 .
[8] 孙 博,周仲华,张虎元,张永霞,郑 龙. 夯土建筑遗址表面温度变化特征及预报模型[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 867 -871 .
[9] 林 萍 ,叶冠林 ,陈 楠 ,王建华 ,桥本正. 冻结法施工旁通道的冻土压力现场监测方法[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2555 -2560 .
[10] 贾善坡 ,伍国军 ,陈卫忠. 基于粒子群算法与混合罚函数法的有限元优化反演模型及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 598 -603 .