Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1643-1650.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1084

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Centrifuge load test on ultimate bearing capacity of geosynthetic-reinforced soil abutment

ZHAO Chong-xi1, XU Chao1, 2, WANG Qing-ming1, ZHANG Sheng3, LI Hao-yu3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Anhui Transport Consulting & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hefei, Anhui 230088, China
  • Received:2023-07-24 Accepted:2023-09-06 Online:2024-06-19 Published:2024-06-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772284) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China- Intergovernmental International Cooperation on Scientific and Technological Innovation (2016YFE0105800).

Abstract: Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) abutment is a load-bearing structure in bridge engineering, and its ultimate bearing capacity has not been recognized clearly. In this study, five GRS abutment centrifuge load tests were conducted under plane strain conditions. The effects of reinforcement strength, setback, and width of bearing area on the ultimate bearing capacity and failure mode of GRS abutments were investigated. The results show that the reinforcement strength significantly impacts the ultimate bearing capacity of GRS abutments. GRS abutments using high-strength reinforcement maintained stability during the loading process. It was observed that the ultimate bearing capacity of GRS abutments with low-strength reinforcement increased with the increase of setback, but its growth trend attenuated. As the bearing area width increased, the ultimate bearing capacity decreased. Compared with test results, the current semi-empirical and semi-theoretical formulas significantly underestimate the ultimate bearing capacity of GRS abutments. The observed failure surfaces all developed from the rear edge of the bearing area, extended downward at an angle to the facing, and terminated at approximately 0.5H (H is the GRS abutment height). The setback and width of bearing area affected the form and location of the failure surfaces, as well as the rupture of the reinforcement near the facing. Existing methods cannot accurately predict the bottom endpoint location and morphology below the bearing area of the failure surface. The increase in the setback and width of bearing area caused the peak strain location of each layer reinforcement to shift towards the interior of the abutment. The reinforcement strain concentrated near the free facing side of the abutment.

Key words: geosynthetic-reinforced soil, GRS abutment, ultimate bearing capacity, centrifuge test, failure surface

CLC Number: 

  • U446
[1] GAO Lu-chao, DAI Guo-liang, ZHANG Ji-sheng, WAN Zhi-hui, YAO Zhong-yuan, WANG Yang, . Centrifugal model tests on lateral cyclic loading behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[2] XIONG Gen, FU Dong-kang, ZHU Bin, LAI Ying, . Centrifuge modelling of suction anchor subjected to inclined load in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[3] YANG Yang, WANG Le, MA Jian-hua, TONG Chen-xi, ZHANG Chun-hui, WANG Zhi-chao, TIAN Ying-hui, . Mechanism of submarine pipeline penetration into calcareous sand considering particle breakage effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 623-632.
[4] ZHOU Zhi-xiong, ZHOU Feng-xi, CAO Xiao-lin, WANG Zhen, . Variational limit equilibrium method analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of composite foundation: vertical reinforcement [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[5] PENG Wen-ming, ZHANG Xue-dong, XIA Yong, . Dynamic centrifugal model tests on earth rock dam resting on soft overburden [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[6] HE Jie, GUO Duan-wei, SONG De-xin, LIU Meng-xin, ZHANG Lei, WEN Qi-feng, . Dynamic response and characteristics of tapered rigid core composite cement-soil piles under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1353-1362.
[7] HUANG Wei, JIAN Wen-bin, YANG Jian, DOU Hong-qiang, LUO Jin-mei, . Prototype test and load transfer characteristic analysis of multi-disk anchor rod [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[8] LEI Yong, CHEN Yu-si, TAN Hao, LI Peng-jia, LIU Yun-si, YU Yi-lin, . Calculation method of ultimate bearing capacity for rock layer of pile tip of bridge pile groups with underground karst cave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3339-3348.
[9] ZHAO Kuan-yao, XU Qiang, GAO Deng-hui, LIU Fang-zhou, PENG Da-lei, CHEN Wan-lin, . Study on the failure mode of a bottom-saturated loess slope by conducting a centrifuge test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3213-3223.
[10] LIU Run, YIN Rui-long, LIANG Chao, CHEN Guang-si. Inner frictional resistance of super-large diameter steel pipe pile in clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(1): 232-240.
[11] ZHONG Zi-lan, HAN Chun-tang, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Xin, MIAO Hui-quan. Ultimate bearing capacity of sand under lateral horizontal movement of shallowly buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 95-103.
[12] YANG Hao, WEI Yu-feng, PEI Xiang-jun, ZHANG Yu-yang, . Centrifugal test study of fracture evolution characteristics of anti-dip rock slope with steep and gently dipping structural plane [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1215-1225.
[13] WANG Jia-yu, LIU Run, JI Yong-hong, YANG Xu, CHEN Guang-si, WANG Xiao-lei, . Upper bound limit analysis of horizontal and moment ultimate bearing capacities of bucket foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 777-788.
[14] QU Chun-lai, FU Di, LIU Shi-wei, LENG Xian-lun, LI Jian-he, SUN He-yuan, . Upper limit analysis for ultimate bearing capacity of heterogeneous stratified slope [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(10): 2923-2932.
[15] YAN Qing, ZHAO Jun-hai, ZHANG Chang-guang. A new solution to the ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced foundation near slope based on the unified strength theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(6): 1587-1600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!