Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (S1): 645-653.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1405

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of liquidity index based on SVR optimization algorithm using piezocone penetration test

WANG Xin-long1, 2, NIE Li-qing1, 2, 3, CAI Guo-jun1, 2, ZHANG Ning1, 2, ZHAO Ze-ning4, LIU Xue-ning4, SONG Deng-hui1, 2   

  1. 1. Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Underground Detection, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 2. Anhui Intelligent Underground Detection and Environmental Geotechnical Engineering Research Center, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 3. Anhui Green Mine Engineering Research Center, Hefei, Anhui 230088, China; 4. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2023-09-18 Accepted:2023-11-20 Online:2024-09-18 Published:2024-09-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (42225206), the Anhui Jianzhu University Scientific Research Reserve Project (2023XMK02) and the Anhui Provincial Green Mine Engineering Research Center Open Fund Project (2022-166).

Abstract: The liquidity index is a critical parameter for studying soil stability, deformation, strength, and related issues. Accurate prediction of the liquidity index is crucial. In this study, we evaluated the liquidity index using support vector regression (SVR), particle swarm optimization-based SVR (PSO-SVR), genetic algorithm-based SVR (GA-SVR), and simulated annealing-based SVR (SA-SVR) algorithms. The assessment utilized the piezocone penetration test (CPTU) dataset from Nanjing and Hefei regions, with the liquidity index derived from liquid limit and plastic limit tests as a reference. Predicted results were compared with laboratory tests and the CPTU empirical formula. Single-hole prediction analysis was conducted to align with engineering practice, and sensitivity analysis explored input parameter effects. Results showed that both the SVR model and optimized SVR models effectively predicted the liquidity index of cohesive soil, with the optimized models outperforming the original. Among these, the SA-SVR model excelled in wave smoothing and moderate peak values, enhancing prediction accuracy. For improved engineering predictions, normalized parameters (cone tip resistance, frictional resistance, pore pressure parameter ratio), overburden stress and effective overburden stress should be used as input variables. Sensitivity trends of PSO-SVR, GA-SVR, and SA-SVR models aligned with theoretical expectations, with SA-SVR exhibiting narrower span and greater consistency, confirming its accuracy. Thus, the proposed SA-SVR model offers superior prediction of cohesive soil liquidity index and guidance for engineering practice.

Key words: piezocone penetration test, liquidity index, support vector regression, particle swarm optimization, genetic algorithm, simulated annealing

CLC Number: 

  • TU435
[1] XIAO Xiao-chun, DING Zhen, DING Xin, XU Jun, FAN Yu-feng, LI Zi-yang, . Joint positioning method of P-wave arrival time picking based analysis-genetic algorithm and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2195-2207.
[2] WANG Kuan-jun, LIU Bin, MO Pin-qiang, LI Guo-yao, ZHU Qi-yin, SHEN Kan-min, HU Jing, . Computational model of CPTu considering temperature effect and drainage state of silt [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1731-1742.
[3] LI Lin, SUN Zhuan-qin. A three-dimensional upper-bound limit analysis of unsaturated embankment considering matric suction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1014-1025.
[4] WANG Kuan-jun, SHEN Kan-min, WANG Ming-yuan, WANG Hong-yu, GUO Zhen, . Strength interpretation parameter of piezoncone penetration test for soft clay in offshore area of Hangzhou Bay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(S1): 521-532.
[5] WANG Ming-yuan, SUN Ji-zhu, WANG Yong, YANG Yang, . The state-dependent bounding surface model calibration based on CPTu data [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3280-3287.
[6] WANG Kuan-jun, JIA Zhi-yuan, SHEN Kan-min, TANG Yan. Joint laboratory and in-situ calibration of strength characteristics for Taizhou coastal soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 2851-2859.
[7] JIANG Yu-hang, WANG Wei, ZOU Li-fang, WANG Ru-bin, LIU Shi-fan, DUAN Xue-lei, . Research on dynamic prediction model of landslide displacement based on particle swarm optimization-variational mode decomposition, nonlinear autoregressive neural network with exogenous inputs and gated recurrent unit [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 601-612.
[8] DONG Fu-rui, WANG Shu-hong, HOU Qin-kuan. Multi-parameter dominant grouping method of rock mass discontinuity based on principal component analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2457-2470.
[9] DU Yu, LIU Song-yu, ZHU Liu-wen, ZOU Hai-feng, CAI Guo-jun, . Soil classification method for port and waterway engineering based on piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1353-1363.
[10] JIA Bao-xin, LI Feng, PAN Yi-shan, ZHOU Lin-li, . Microseismic source locating method based on variable step size accelerated search [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 843-856.
[11] WU Meng, CAI Guo-jun, WANG Cai-jin, DUAN Wei, LIU Song-yu, QIAO Huan-huan, HONG Yi, . Reliability identification of subsurface shallow gas based on resistivity piezocone penetration tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3463-3473.
[12] WANG Ye-huan, WANG Yong, KONG Ling-wei, CHEN Cheng, GUO Ai-guo, . Identification of shallow gas-bearing strata based on in situ multi-function piezocone penetration test and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3474-3483.
[13] DENG Yu-chen, CHEN Zhi-bo, ZHENG You-qiang, PAN Sheng-gui, . CPTU-based modified soil behavior type index classification method and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 227-234.
[14] LU Tai-shan, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, WU Kai, XIA Wen-jun, . Study on the disturbance and recompression settlement of soft soil induced by foundation excavation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 565-573.
[15] LIU Quan-sheng, WANG Dong, ZHU Yuan-guang, YANG Zhan-biao, BO Yin. Application of support vector regression algorithm in inversion of geostress field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[3] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[4] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[5] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[6] HUANG Run-qiu, XU De-min. Volume change method for testing rock or rock mass permeability[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2961 -2964 .
[7] LU Zheng, YAO Hai-lin, LUO Xing-wen, HU Meng-ling. 3D dynamic responses of layered ground under vehicle loads[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .
[8] SUN Yong. Research on calculation method of double-row anti-sliding structure under sliding surface[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .
[9] CHEN Zhen, TAO Long-guang, LI Tao, LI Hai-bin, WANG Zong-yong. A new method for settlement computation of box foundation with supporting structure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2978 -2984 .
[10] CHU Xi-hua, XU Yuan-jie. Studies on transformation from M-C criterion to Drucker-Prager criterions based on distortion energy density[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .