Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1429-1441.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0924

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions

LIU Hong-shuai1, YANG Jian-sheng1, SONG Dong-song2, SUN Qiang-qiang1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structure, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2024-07-25 Accepted:2024-09-30 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2019EEEVL0202), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province(E2024201045) and the Science & Technology Research Project of Higher Education Institutions in Hebei Province (ZD2020157).

Abstract: The effects of near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions on structural responses differ significantly, yet their impacts on site ground motion parameters remain unclear. Therefore, a centrifuge shaking table model test of a dry sand site under 50g (g represents the acceleration caused by gravity) centrifugal acceleration was designed and conducted. The model site consisted of Fujian standard fine sand with a relative density of 50%. The pulsed acceleration record from Saratoga Aloha Ave station and the non-pulsed record from Capitola station, both within the near-fault range in the east-west direction of the Loma Prieta earthquake, were selected as inputs for the shaking table. An accelerometer vertical array and surface settlement gauge were placed at the center of the site, while horizontal displacement gauges were fixed on the lateral outside of the model box. This setup was used to compare the response differences of the dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions and to evaluate the correlations between site ground motion parameters and the peak acceleration values of the input ground motion. The model test results show that compared to non-pulsed ground motions, pulsed ground motions significantly reduce the amplification factors of peak acceleration but increase the final surface settlements of the site. For peak horizontal displacement, pulsed ground motions increase the peak displacements in the deep soil layer (> 15 m) but significantly reduce them in the shallow layer (< 5 m). Statistical results reveal high correlations between site seismic response parameters (amplification factors of peak surface acceleration, surface settlement, shallow peak horizontal displacement, Arias intensity) and the input peaks acceleration of ground motion, with all fitting coefficients R² greater than or equal to 0.97. These results provide a reliable experimental basis for further numerical simulations to study the impact of near-fault pulsed ground motions on site seismic response.

Key words: dry sand free site, seismic response, pulsed ground motion, non-pulsed ground motion, centrifugal shaking table test

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] YANG Jing-quan, ZHENG Chang-jie, DING Xuan-ming, . Seismic response of pipe piles in saturated soil to vertically incident P-waves [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[2] ZHOU Huan-zhu, LIU Sheng-an, LI Bin, CHEN Wei-yun, SU Lei, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZHENG Ye-wei, . Analytical solution of seismic response of flexible joint of immersed tunnel crossing different strata [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[3] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[4] TAO Zhi-gang, FENG Yu-xiang, ZHAO Yi , ZHANG Xiao-yu , HE Man-chao, LEI Xiao-tian, . Shaking table test on anti-seismic characteristics of NPR anchor cable support system for tunnel crossing faults [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[5] REN Lu-yao, WU Zhen-jie, HUANG Qi-chao, GUAN Zhen-chang. Analytical study on longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnels considering axial force [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 2971-2980.
[6] WANG Yong-guang, LIANG Jian-wen, BA Zhen-ning, . A dynamic nonlinear constitutive model for soil based on modified damping and its implementation in Abaqus [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(8): 2287-2296.
[7] SHEN Hui, LIU Ya-qun, LIU Bo, LI Hai-bo, . Numerical study on the amplification effect of rock slopes under oblique incidence of seismic waves [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 2129-2142.
[8] JIA Ke-min, XU Cheng-shun, DU Xiu-li, ZHANG Xiao-ling, SONG Ji, SU Zhuo-lin, . Mechanism of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in liquefiable inclined sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1848.
[9] ZHU Sheng-dong, CHEN Guo-xing, CHEN Wei-yun, GAO Wen-sheng, LI Wen-biao, . Influence of soil secondary nonlinearity on 3D seismic responses of a pile-founded nuclear island structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1501-1511.
[10] ZHENG Chang-jie, CUI Yi-qin, WU Chen, LUO Tong, LUAN Lu-bao, . Simplified analytical solution for horizontal seismic response of single piles to vertically incident S waves [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[11] ZHANG Zheng-zhe, JIA Ke-min, XU Cheng-shun, PAN Ru-jiang. Difference analysis of seismic responses of inclined liquefaction site-pile-structure system under near-field pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[12] ZHU Sai-nan, CHEN Yan-hua, WANG Ning, LI Wei-hua, ZHANG Wei-wei. Analytical solution of imperfect contact effect at the interface between undersea tunnel and seabed soil under plane P1 waves incidence [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(10): 3049-3058.
[13] HU Yao, LEI Hua-yang, LEI Zheng, LIU Ying-nan, . Shaking table test on seismic response of stacked tunnels under three-directional earthquake wave excitation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 104-116.
[14] ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li. Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 2015-2024.
[15] AN Jun-hai, TAO Lian-jin, JIANG Lu-zhen, . A shaking table-based experimental study on seismic response of a shield- enlarge-dig type subway station structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!