Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 3447-3460.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1880

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influencing factors of caprock sealing performance for multi-layer CO2 injection

MA Ji-yuan1, 2, CHENG Guo-qiang3, LI Xia-ying1, 2, YANG Ling-xue3, LI Qi1, 2, MA Jing3, CHEN Bo-wen1, 2, YANG Chuan-feng3, ZHANG Yao1, 2, LI Feng-yang3, YU Tao1, 2, HU Ting3, XU Zong-hong3, ZHONG Yi-yan1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Institute of Hydroenvironmental Geology, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750011, China
  • Received:2023-12-15 Accepted:2024-06-27 Online:2024-11-11 Published:2024-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Innovative Group Project of the Joint Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2244215), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2021CFA030) and the Ningxia Carbon Dioxide Geological Storage Survey, Test and Demonstration Project (TZZD/ NZC220120C).

Abstract: Due to the heterogeneity and low permeability of most CO2 reservoirs in China, CO2 storage within a single reservoir is difficult to meet the demand for emission reduction. To achieve large-scale CO2 geological storage, multi-formation injection technology has been proposed to increase the amount of CO2 geological storage. To explore the main influencing factors on the caprock sealing performance under the condition of multi-formation CO2 injection, the seepage-stress coupling simulation analysis was carried out. Pore pressure, displacement, and incremental Coulomb failure stress (ΔCFS) are used as the basis for evaluating the caprock sealing performance. The tornado analysis method was used for sensitivity analysis to select the factors that have a significant impact on the caprock sealing performance. The research results indicate that the more injection layers, the smaller the displacement, pore pressure, and ΔCFS of the caprock, and the better the caprock sealing performance. However, if the number of layers exceeds 3, the efficiency increase brought by the number of layers will no longer be significant; The main controlling factors for the sealing performance of the caprock include the Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus of the caprock, thickness and permeability coefficient of the reservoir, and injection rate; When the thickest caprock is located at the topmost part of the entire formation, the caprock sealing performance is the best, producing the smallest vertical displacement, pore pressure, and ΔCFS.

Key words: CO2 geological storage, caprock sealing performance, multi-formation injection, sensitivity analysis, Coulomb failure stress

CLC Number: 

  • TU 42
[1] FENG Shi-jin, XU Yi, YANG Jun-yi, ZHENG Qi-teng, ZHANG Xiao-lei, . Risk assessment of landfill instability based on set pair-combination weighting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[2] CAO Jian-jun, HU Bin, WANG Ze-qi, LI Jing, . Creep damage model of weak interlayer based on fractional order integral [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[3] LI Xiang, WANG Jing-tong, WEI Heng. Reliability analysis of rock tunnel stability based on interval non-probability under multiple failure modes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(8): 2409-2418.
[4] ZHAO Yan, YANG Liu, XI Ru-ru, GENG Zhen-kun, ZHANG Qian, MA Xiong-de, . CO2-H2O two-phase displacement characteristics of low permeability core using nuclear magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance imaging techniques [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1636-1644.
[5] CHEN Yong, SU Jian, CAO Ling, WANG li, WANG Shi-mei, . Evolution law of the soil-water characteristic curve based on data mining method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[6] ZHOU Bing-hong. A simplified method to estimate soil-water characteristic curve for sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
[7] LIU Xiao-hu, YAO Zhi-shu, CHENG Hua, ZHA Wen-hua, WU Jie-hao, . Analysis and application of catastrophe instability mechanism of intersection point in a deep roadway [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 521-531.
[8] LI Zhi-hao, XIAO Shi-guo. Calculation method for seismic permanent displacement of cantilever retaining walls considering different movement modes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 723-734.
[9] LI Jian-fei, SU Yang, SUN Zhi-bin, ZHAO Chen, . 3D seismic displacement analysis method of stepped slopes reinforced with piles based on Newmark principle [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(8): 2785-2795.
[10] WU Shun-chuan, SUN Wei, LIU Yang, CHENG Zi-qiao, XU Xue-liang, . Study on simulation method of mode I fracture toughness and its meso-influencing factors [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(8): 2536-2546.
[11] ZHANG Qiang, LI Xiao-chun, ZHOU Ying-bo, SHI Lu, BAI Bing, . Shear behavior of the Triassic sandstone in Sichuan under high pore pressure of H2O/CO2 conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[12] WANG Zhi-rong, HE Ping, GUO Zhi-wei, WANG Yong-chun. Calculation of initiation pressure of vertical well for coalbed methane considering crack characteristic index [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 369-377.
[13] GUO Chong-yang, LI Dian-qing, CAO Zi-jun, GAO Guo-hui, TANG Xiao-song. Efficient reliability sensitivity analysis for slope stability in spatially variable soils [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[14] WU Hai-qing, BAI Bing, LI Xiao-chun, LIU Ming-ze, HE Yuan-yuan, . Analytical model of fluid pressure evolution in the reservoir for CO2 geological storage [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2099-2105.
[15] LI Kai-da, HU Shao-bin, LI Xiao-chun, WU Jian, FAN Qing-yi, WU Hai-qing,. Influence of single-phase fluid on strength characteristics of sandstone [J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1789-1795.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!