Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1657-1666.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1067

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research •     Next Articles

Evolution of soil arching in passive trapdoor tests

RUI Rui1, LIN A H1, YANG Jun-chao2, YANG Shuo1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; 2. Guangzhou First Municipal Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
  • Received:2024-08-29 Accepted:2024-11-25 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272315).

Abstract: The arching effect is widely observed in geotechnical engineering and is typically studied using trapdoor tests. Traditional trapdoor tests ignore the conditions of passive trapdoors, such as tunnel uplift and anchor plate pullout. To address this gap, a servo-controlled lifting array-type trapdoor test apparatus was developed. A plane strain passive trapdoor test was conducted using dense sand as the backfill material. During the lifting process of trapdoor, the vertical load variations across the entire array and sectional displacements were collected, resulting in load-displacement response curve for the evolution of passive arching effect. The test results show that as the backfill height increases, load redistribution becomes more pronounced. This is evidenced by increases in the maximum arching ratio, ultimate arching ratio, and corresponding normalized displacement. Sectional displacements and sliding surfaces develop towards the backfill surface in a “funnel” shape. Shear strain concentrates on both sides of the trapdoor, forming a significant curved sliding surface. The angle between the sliding surface and the vertical direction is close to 0º at the base and increases with the embankment elevation. When the fill height is greater, new sliding surfaces develop inside the outer sliding surface as the trapdoor continues to rise. A modified limit equilibrium method calculation formula was derived based on the measured angles between the shear band and the vertical direction. The calculated maximum arching ratio closely matches the experimental results.

Key words: trapdoor test, tunnel uplift resistance, soil arching effect, shear band, soil arching ratio

CLC Number: 

  • TU415
[1] WANG Hong-tao, LIU Rong-li, ZHAO Xiao-dong, ZHAO Yao-hui, ZHAO Wan-li, . Mechanical effect analysis of soil arch between piles under composite support of steel pipe piles and cast-in-place piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[2] YAO Jia-nan, XU Chang-jie, CHI Min-liang, WANG Yan-ping, XI Yue-lai, WANG Wei-feng, FENG Guo-hui, SUN Jia-zheng, . Discrete element simulation and theoretical study on non-limit active earth pressure of rigid retaining wall under RBT mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[3] LIU Zong-qi, CHEN Xi, CUI Liu-sheng, TANG Jian-bin. Porosity field measurement technique for shear band width in direct shear and biaxial discrete element numerical experiments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 742-750.
[4] LI Ze-chuang, ZHANG Hao, CHENG Pei-feng, WANG Yan-li, . Experimental study on the development process and spatial distribution of shear band of coarse-grained sliding zone soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1067-1080.
[5] WANG Jia-quan, CHEN Jia-ming, LIN Zhi-nan, TANG Yi, . Study on loose soil pressure based on triangular slip surfaces [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[6] ZHAO Kai, SHAO Shuai, SHAO Sheng-jun, WEI Jun-zheng, ZHANG Shao-ying, ZHANG Yu, . Study on shear bands of undisturbed loess under plane strain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 433-441.
[7] LI Cheng-sheng, KONG Ling-wei, SHU Rong-jun, LIU Zhi-jun, ZHANG Bing-xin, . Meso-structure damage evolution in shear bands of granite residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(11): 3203-3212.
[8] DAI Tian-yi, XIAO Shi-guo, . Settlement calculation method of rigid pile composite foundation considering interaction between supported embankment and improved zone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[9] DENG You-sheng, LI Ling-tao, PENG Cheng-pu, LI Long, LIU Jun-cong, FU Yun-bo. Model tests on geogrid reinforced pile supported embankment under static and dynamic loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2149-2156.
[10] LI Chun-lin. Curved solid failure model and calculation method of supporting pressure for shield tunnel excavation face [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[11] WANG Yi-wei, LIU Run, SUN Ruo-han, XU Ze-wei. Macroscopic and mesoscopic correlation of granular materials based on rolling resistance linear contact model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 945-956.
[12] WANG Jia-quan, QI Hang-xiang, LIN Zhi-nan, TANG Yi, . Pull-out test on geosynthetic reinforced sand based on digital image analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(12): 3259-3269.
[13] WANG Xue-bin, LIU Tong-xin, BAI Xue-yuan, LI Ji-xiang. Numerical simulation of fracturing processes of rock specimens in uniaxial compression based on the continuum-discontinuum method considering the dynamic constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(10): 2911-2922.
[14] ZHU Sheng, ZHANG Yuan, JIALIBIEKE Ahalibieke, YU Jian-qing, HE Zhao-sheng, . Joint inversion method of instantaneous and creep parameters of rockfill dam based on incremental analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[15] CUI Peng-bo, ZHU Yong-quan, LIU Yong, ZHU Zheng-guo, PAN Ying-dong, . Model test and particle flow numerical simulation of soil arch effect for unsaturated sandy soil tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!