›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (8): 2182-2188.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.08.004

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of active earth pressure on retaining walls based on curved sliding surface

YANG Gui1, 2, WANG Yang-yang1, 2, LIU Yan-chen1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Institute of Engineering Safety and Disaster Prevention, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2015-09-21 Online:2017-08-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51479059) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013B31914).

Abstract: The shape of sliding surface has important influence on the active earth pressure of retaining wall. A new active earth pressure formulation is proposed based on horizontal differential element method assuming retaining wall backfilled with cohesionless soils is under horizontal translation model. The assumption of formulation is that the sliding surface is curved when backfill behind a retaining wall reaches limit equilibrium and that the soil arching is considered. First, the reliability of the formulation is verified based on the compared calculation results of the formulation, model test and classical theory. Second, the influences of the different internal frictional angles of soil and wall-soil friction angles on the distribution, resultant and loading position of active earth pressure are analyzed. The results show the regions of sliding wedge obtained from curved sliding surface assumption are slightly bigger than the regions of plane assumption. The results by the proposed formulation are more consistent with model test results for retaining walls of different heights. The distribution form and loading position of active earth pressure are close to Paik’s solutions in different inner friction angles and friction angles on the soil-wall interface. However, the magnitudes of active earth pressure are greater than Paik’s solutions slightly.

Key words: curved sliding surface, retaining wall, soil arching effect, active earth pressure

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] BAO Ning, WEI Jing, CHEN Jian-feng. Three dimensional discrete element analysis of soil arching in piled embankment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] CHEN Jian-gong, YANG Yang, CHEN Yan-han, CHEN Xiao-bing. Calculation of active earth pressure of cohesive soil behind retaining wall considering soil tensile strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[3] HUANG Yu-hua, XU Lin-rong, ZHOU Jun-jie, CAI Yu, . Calculation of pile-soil stress in pile-net composite foundation based on improved Terzarghi method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[4] ZHAO Xiao-yan, FAN Yu-fei, LIU Liang, JIANG Chu-sheng, . Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[5] CHEN Jian-xu, SONG Wen-wu, . Non-limit active earth pressure for retaining wall under translational motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[6] RUI Rui, YE Yu-qiu, CHEN Cheng, TU Shu-jie. Nonlinear distribution of active earth pressure on retaining wall considering wall-soil friction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[7] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, LEI Tao, LIU Qi, WANG Zhi-meng, LIU Yong, . Calculation of seismic displacement of reinforced soil retaining walls considering backfill strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[8] CHEN Zheng, HE Ping, YAN Du-min, GAO Hong-jie, . A method to calculate rational spacing between pipes in pipe roofs considering soil arching effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[9] XU Peng , JIANG Guan-lu , WANG Xun, HUANG Hao-wei , HUANG Zhe, WANG Zhi-meng, . Centrifuge model tests on influence of facing on reinforced soil retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[10] XU Peng, JIANG Guan-lu, QIU Jun-jie, GAO Ze-fei, WANG Zhi-meng, . Shaking table tests on reinforced soil retaining walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 998-1004.
[11] WANG Jia-quan, ZHANG Liang-liang, LAI Yi, LU Meng-liang, YE Bin, . Large-scale model tests on static and dynamic mechanical characteristics of reinforced earth retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 497-505.
[12] LIU Yang, YU Peng-qiang. Analysis of soil arch and active earth pressure on translating rigid retaining walls [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[13] WANG Jia-quan, XU Liang-jie, HUANG Shi-bin, LIU Zheng-quan. Bearing capacity analysis of geogrid reinforced abutment retaining wall under dynamic load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(11): 4220-4228.
[14] ZHANG Xiao-xi, HE Si-ming, FAN Xiao-yi, . Seismic stability of L-shape retaining walls and determination method of sliding surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4011-4020.
[15] ZHENG Jun-jie, LÜ Si-qi, CAO Wen-zhao, JING Dan, . Numerical simulation of composite rigid-flexible pile-supported retaining wall under the action of high-filled expansive soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!