›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 3067-3073.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.10.037

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Development of a new apparatus for measurement of groundwater level under vacuum pre-loading

BAO Shu-feng1, 2, LOU Yan3, DONG Zhi-liang1, 2, NIU Fei1, 2, XIE Rong-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. CCCC Key Lab of Environmental Protection & Safety in Foundation Engineering of Transportation, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 3. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Received:2015-11-27 Online:2017-10-10 Published:2018-06-05

Abstract: Current methods for groundwater level testing could not accurately reflect the actual variation of the groundwater level under vacuum pre-loading, and thus their limitations were comprehensively analyzed in this paper. A new testing method, namely closed piezometric testing method-laser testing method, was described in detail. Moreover, field tests were conducted to verify the rationality of the developed method. The results show that some restrictions are found in the existing closed piezometric testing method. On the one hand, the employed devices are very complex and challenging to install. On the other hand, experimental results are affected by many factors, which indicates that the results could not truly represent the ground level under vacuum pre-loading condition. However, the proposed new testing method has merits of easy, low-cost and intuitive results, owning to its principle of laser ranging. The field testing results show that during vacuum pre-loading, the groundwater level falls with the subsidence of ground foundation. In addition, the overall decline is slightly greater than the consolidation settlement of the foundation. Therefore, the new method can accurately reflect the actual variation of the groundwater level, and is useful to evaluate and analyse the effect of vacuum pre-loading.

Key words: vacuum preloading method, laser testing method, variation of groundwater level

CLC Number: 

  • TU 46

[1] SONG Lin-hui, WANG Yu-hao, FU Lei, MEI Guo-xiong,. Test and analysis on buoyancy of underground structure in soft clay [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 753-758.
[2] LI Qing, XU Zhong-hua, WANG Wei-dong, ZHANG Jiao,. Field and laboratory measurements on shear modulus of typical Shanghai clay at small strain [J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3263-3269.
[3] LIU Guo-bin , LI Qing , NG C W W . Influence of secondary compression due to groundwater mining on long-term tunnel settlement [J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3729-3735.
[4] MA Tian-tian, WEI Chang-fu, LI Huan, CHEN Pan, WEI Hou-zhen. Hydro-mechanical coupling model of unsaturated porous media considering effect of capillary hysteresis [J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 198-204.
[5] YE Jun-neng, LIU Gan-bin. Anti-floating safety design of structures in metro station considering friction resistance enclosure protection [J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 279-283.
[6] XIE Xing-hua, SU Bao-yu. A review of fracture rock hydraulic fracturing research [J]. , 2004, 25(2): 330-336.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!