›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1395-1400.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.1048

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Risk assessment method of karst ground collapse based on weight back analysis

LI Jian-peng1, NIE Qing-ke2, LIU Quan-sheng3, YU Jun-chao2   

  1. 1. Hebei Provincial Communications Planning and Design Institue, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, China; 2. Hebei Research Institute of Construction and Geotechnical Investigation Co. Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031, China; 3. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2016-05-09 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by Hebei Provincial Department of Transportation Science and Technology Project (20130012).

Abstract: A new risk assessment method for karst ground collapse is presented in order to quickly and accurately assess the risk of surface subsidence in covered karst area. Firstly, the main factors were identified by mechanism analysis of karst ground collapse, and secondly the weight back analysis method was used to obtain the weights of main factors of karst ground collapse based on 100 typical engineering examples in Tangshan city. As a result, a score sheet of comprehensive hazard evaluation of karst ground collapse was established. Studies have shown that the weights of selected five main factors are as follows: karst development degree- 0.338, water-resisting capacity of impermeable layer-0.255, overburden thickness-0.186, depth of bedrock water level-0.174, and distance from the fault-0.047. The karst ground collapse hazard evaluation results of the 100 project examples based on the proposed score sheet have shown that the correct rate is 99% ,which can prove that the proposed method has a good performance in feasibility and effectiveness. In addition, the proposed method has the advantage of easy access of evaluation factors and high efficiency, and therefore it is worth popularizing and applying.

Key words: karst, ground collapse, risk assessment, weight, back analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU 42

[1] YANG Kai-xuan, HOU Tian-shun. Influence of compaction test types on compaction characteristics of EPS particles light weight soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[2] YANG Dao-xue, ZHAO Kui, ZENG Peng, ZHUO Yu-long, . Numerical simulation of unknown wave velocity acoustic emission localization based on particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
[3] CHEN Wu, ZHANG Guo-hua, WANG Hao, CHEN Li-biao, . Risk assessment of mountain tunnel collapse based on rough set and conditional information entropy [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3549-3558.
[4] ZHU Yan-peng, DU Xiao-qi, YANG Xiao-hui, LI Hui-jun, . Research on utility tunnel foundation treated by compaction piles and post-work immersion test in self-weight collapsible loess area with large thickness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[5] QIU Jin-wei, PU He-fu, CHEN Xun-long, LÜ Wei-dong, LI Lei. Coupled analysis of self-weight consolidation and contaminant transport in confined disposal of contaminated sediments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3090-3098.
[6] DENG Mao-lin, YI Qing-lin, HAN Bei, ZHOU Jian, LI Zhuo-jun, ZHANG Fu-ling, . Analysis of surface deformation law of Muyubao landslide in Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[7] LIU Zong-hui, LIU Mao-mao, ZHOU Dong, LAN Ri-yan, WU Heng, WANG Ye-tian, . Recognition method of typical anomalies in karst tunnel construction based on attribute analysis of ground penetrating radar [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3282-3290.
[8] ZHANG Hai-ting, YANG Lin-qing, GUO Fang, . Solution and analysis of dynamic response for rigid buried pipe in multi-layered soil based on SBFEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[9] YUAN Wei, LIU Shang-ge, NIE Qing-ke, WANG Wei, . An approach for determining the critical thickness of the karst cave roof at the bottom of socketed pile based on punch failure mode [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[10] GONG Wen-hui, ZHAO Xu-dong, QIU Jin-wei, LI Yi, YANG Han. Nonlinear analysis of one-dimensional consolidation of saturated clay including dead-weight effects and large strain [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[11] PU He-fu, SONG Ding-bao, ZHENG Jun-jie, ZHOU Yang, YAN Jing, LI Zhan-yi. Non-linear self-weight consolidation model of saturated soft soil under large-strain condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[12] ZHANG Ting-ting, LI Jiang-shan, WANG Ping, XUE Qiang, . Stabilization characteristics and risk assessment of hexavalent chromium-contaminated soils by ferrous sulfate treatment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3928-3936.
[13] LI Lian-xiang, LIU Jia-dian, LI Ke-jin, HUANG Heng-li, JI Xiang-kai, . Study of parameters selection and applicability of HSS model in typical stratum of Jinan [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[14] ZHANG Wen-sheng, LUO Qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LI Ang, . Reliability analysis of soil slope considering moment estimation bias using small sample geotechnical parameters [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 315-324.
[15] LIU Yang-yang, GUO Zeng-zhang, LI Yong-qiang, LI You-peng. Risk assessment model of highway slope based on entropy weight set pair analysis and vehicle laser scanning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 131-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!