›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 1479-1490.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0856

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of 1D equivalent-linear and nonlinear seismic site responses for quaternary deep sediment layers in Suzhou region

ZHU Jiao1, 2, XU Han-gang2, 3, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China; 3. Earthquake Administration of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Online:2018-04-11 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378258, 51438004).

Abstract: A reasonable description of soil hysteretic constitutive relation has a significant impact on the evaluation of design ground motion parameters. Based on the 200-meter deep borehole profile in Suzhou region, the 1-D seismic site response analyses were performed by equivalent linear wave propagation analysis (ELA) and nonlinear analysis (NLA) using a multi-degree-of-freedom, lumped mass model in term of the modified Matasovic constitutive model. The effects of bedrock motion characteristics and bedrock interface depth on site response in deep sediment layers were analyzed. The results show that: 1) Surface peak ground acceleration (PGA) calculated by ELA increases monotonically as the PGA of bedrock motion increases. However, surface PGA calculated by NLA first rapidly increases and then gradually decreases or keeps constant. 2) Surface acceleration response spectra (Sa) for short periods computed using ELA and NLA show significant differences. The high-frequency contents of bedrock motions exhibit obvious filtering in ELA, while the high-frequency contents in NLA first magnify and then attenuate as the PGA of bedrock motion increases. 3) Surface Sa values become slightly larger with increasing bedrock surface depth. However, surface Sa values for the periods less than 0.1 s computed by NLA become slightly smaller. 4) For the medium or strong bedrock motions, the surface ground motion duration is closely related to bedrock motion characteristics, site response analysis methods and seismic bedrock surface depth. The influence of bedrock motion intensity and the overburden thickness on the duration prolongation of surface ground motion can be reasonably evaluated by NLA.

Key words: deep sediment layers, seismic site response, equivalent linearity, nonlinearity, peak ground acceleration, acceleration response spectrum, ground motion duration

CLC Number: 

  • TU 435

[1] ZHU Jian-feng, XU Ri-qing, LUO Zhan-you, PAN Bin-jie, RAO Chun-yi, . A nonlinear constitutive model for soft clay stabilized by magnesia cement considering the effect of solidified agent content [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[2] YU Zhao-sheng, CHEN Xiao-bin, ZHANG Jia-sheng, DONG Liang, ABDOULKADER M S. Analysis of the nonlinearity of coefficient of earth pressure at rest and its calculation method for coarse-grained soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] LI Jing-jing, KONG Ling-wei, . Creep properties of expansive soil under unloading stress and its nonlinear constitutive model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[4] MA Qiu-feng, QIN Yue-ping, ZHOU Tian-bai, YANG Xiao-bin. Mechanical properties and constitutive model of porous rock under loading and unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[5] LI Lin, LI Jing-pei, SUN De-an, GONG Wei-bing , . Nonlinear load-settlement analysis of pile groups considering pile installation effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 668-677.
[6] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, GAO Liu-cheng, CHEN Su, DU Xiu-li, . Shaking table test on effects of ground motion duration compression ratio on seismic response of liquefied foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 147-155.
[7] LI Hai-li, ZHANG Chen-rong, LU Kai,. Nonlinear analysis of response of buried pipelines induced by tunneling [J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 289-296.
[8] ZOU De-gao, LIU Suo, CHEN Kai, KONG Xian-jing, YU Xiang,. Static and dynamic analysis of seismic response nonlinearity for geotechnical engineering using quadtree mesh and polygon scaled boundary finite element method [J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 33-40.
[9] ZHOU Yan-guo, TAN Xiao-ming, LIANG Tian, HUANG Bo, LING Dao-sheng, CHEN Yun-min,. Evaluation of soil liquefaction by ground motion intensity index by centrifuge model test [J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1869-1877.
[10] LI Bin , LIU Yan-zhang , LIN Kun-feng,. Application scope of nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb criterion and its modification [J]. , 2016, 37(3): 637-646.
[11] CAO Wen-gui, ZHANG Chao, HE Min, LIU Tao. Deformation simulation of brittle rock based on micromechanical properties [J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2753-2760.
[12] LI Wen-tao, MA Tian-tian, WEI Chang-fu. An efficient finite element procedure for unsaturated flow based on adaptive relaxed Picard method [J]. , 2016, 37(1): 256-262.
[13] CHEN Guo-xing ,JIN Dan-dan ,ZHU Jiao ,LI Xiao-jun , . Nonlinear seismic response of estuarine basin and design parameters of ground motion [J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1721-1736.
[14] KONG Meng-yun , CHEN Guo-xing , LI Xiao-jun , CHANG Xiang-dong , ZHOU Guo-liang,. Shear wave velocity and peak ground acceleration based deterministic and probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential [J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1239-1252.
[15] CHEN Guo-xing ,KONG Meng-yun ,LI Xiao-jun ,CHANG Xiang-dong ,ZHOU Guo-liang,. Deterministic and probabilistic triggering correlations for assessment of seismic soil liquefaction at nuclear power plant [J]. , 2015, 36(1): 9-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!