›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 2259-2266.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2153

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Seismic response of high concrete face rockfill dams subject to non-uniform input motion

YAO Yu1, 2, WANG Rui1, LIU Tian-yun1, ZHANG Jian-min1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute, Beijing 100120, China
  • Received:2016-10-26 Online:2018-06-11 Published:2018-07-03
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678346).

Abstract: Based on multipoint ground motion input method and an equivalent visco-elastic constitutive model for rockfill, a semi-analytical method is used to conduct dynamic analysis of high concrete face rockfill dams (CFRD) subject to non-uniform input motion. The validation of the calculation method is first conducted in the frequency domain. Under the condition that the acceleration time histories on the surface of the free field are assumed to be consistent for different modes of non-uniform and uniform seismic input, the following main conclusions can be drawn. The seismic response to the non-uniform input is generally smaller than that to the uniform input. The dynamic tensile stresses become obviously larger at the waterstops (the seepage control system of CFRD) for the non-uniform input than for the uniform one. The seismic responses of the high CFRD to the non-uniform input are characterized by the smaller in central part and the larger around the boundary. The seismic response of high CFRDs under the incidence of P, SV and SH waves are featured by the following several main facts and findings: With increasing incident angle for SH waves, the response intensity shows almost constant. There exists a critical angle for SV waves. When the incident angle is close to the critical angle, the response intensity first increases and then decreases sharply, and before that, the intensity is nearly constant, while after that, the intensity keeps decreasing. There exists a feature angle for P waves. When the incident angle is smaller than it, the response intensity is almost constant, while when larger, the intensity keeps decreasing.

Key words: high CFRD, non-uniform input, seismic response, angle of incidence, wave theory

CLC Number: 

  • TV 641

[1] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[2] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[3] HAN Jun-yan, ZHONG Zi-lan, LI Li-yun, ZHAO Mi, WAN Ning-tan, DU Xiu-li. Nonlinear seismic response of free-field soil under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[4] ZOU You-xue, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-mi, . Analysis on the seismic response of stone columns composite foundation in liquefiable soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[5] ZHANG Kui, ZHAO Cheng-gang, LI Wei-hua. Study of the seismic response of the seafloor ground containing soft soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2456-2468.
[6] SUN Guang-chen, XIE Jia-you, HE Shan, FU He-lin, JIANG Xue-liang, ZHENG Liang, . Dynamic responses of bridge-tunnel approaching parts under different seismic excitation directions in soft surrounding rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 893-902.
[7] XU Zi-gang, DU Xiu-li, XU Cheng-shun, ZHANG Chi-yu, JIANG Jia-wei. Comparison of determination methods of site Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic responses analysis of underground structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4838-4847.
[8] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Large-scale shaking table model test of liquefiable free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[9] LIU Zhong-xian, ZHANG Zheng, WANG Shao-jie, LIANG Jian-wen, WANG Hai-liang, . 3D seismic response broadband-simulation of the alluvial basin in urban region based on the FMM-IBEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 4101-4110.
[10] XU Ming, TANG Ya-feng, LIU Xian-shan, LUO Bin, TANG Dao-yong,. Seismic dynamic response of rock slope anchored with adaptive anchor cables [J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[11] HAN Bing, LIANG Jian-wen, ZHU Jun,. Effect of lenticle on seismic response of structures in deep water-saturated poroelastic soft site [J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[12] HAN Jun-yan, DU Xiu-li, HOU Ben-wei, LI Li-yun, ZHONG Zi-lan, ZHAO Mi (Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing , China. A simplified analysis model for pipe-soil structural seismic responses under longitudinal non-uniform seismic excitations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(12): 4651-4658.
[13] LI Rui-shan, YUAN Xiao-ming, LI Cheng-cheng. Analysis of relationship between dynamic shear strain and vibration velocity of horizontal soil layers [J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3623-3630.
[14] YIN Xun-qiang, JIN Yu-hao, WANG Gui-xuan,. Seismic response analysis of nuclear island buildings considering soil-structure interaction and nonlinear soil foundation [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1114-1120.
[15] YANG Xiao-mei, LAI Qiang-lin. Time-domain equivalent linearization method for two-dimensional seismic response analysis [J]. , 2017, 38(3): 847-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!