›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2984-2990.

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on critical height of reinforced embankments with geocell layer

LIANG Cheng1, XU Chao1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2016-12-10 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272293).

Abstract: Geocell geosynthetics can effectively reduce the deformation of embankments on soft subgrade and enhance its stability, but there are few researches on critical height of geocell-supported embankments. In this study, the limit equilibrium method was employed, and circular sliding failure mode presented in the foundation under the embankment load was assumed firstly. Geocell and its filled soil were regarded as composite material considering its vertical stress dispersion effects and lateral confinement effects. An analytical model about critical height of the embankments was then proposed and its results were compared with that of the finite difference model which was calculated using FLAC. Finally, the effects of geocell height, angle of stress dispersion and friction coefficient between geocell layer and foundation on the critical height of embankments were discussed based on the analytical model. It turned out that the results between theoretical analysis and numerical calculation were well coincident with each other. The critical height of geocell-reinforced embankments was obviously greater than the critical height of unreinforced ones. Increasing the three influencing factors can improve its critical height, and strengthening the lateral confinement of geocell layer was more in favor of the stability of embankments than improving the geocell height and angle of stress dispersion.

Key words: reinforced embankments, geocell, composite material, stability, critical height

CLC Number: 

  • TU 472

[1] DU Wen-jie, SHENG Qian, FU Xiao-dong, TANG Hua, CHEN He, DU Yu-xiang, ZHOU Yong-qiang. Dynamic stability analysis and failure mechanism of Yanyang village landslide under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] MAO Hao-yu, XU Nu-wen, LI Biao, FAN Yi-lin, WU Jia-yao, MENG Guo-tao, . Stability analysis of an underground powerhouse on the left bank of the Baihetan hydropower station based on discrete element simulation and microseismic monitoring [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] XIAO Shi-guo, LIU Hang, YU Xin-zuo. Analysis method of seismic overall stability of soil slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] WANG Hong-xin, SHEN Xu-kai, . Heave-resistant stability analysis method of foundation pit considering support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[5] XIAO Ming-qing, XU Chen, . Discussion on stability analysis method of tunnel surrounding rock based on critical stable section [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[6] ZHU Yan-peng, YAN Zi-hao, ZHU Yi-fan. Stability calculation of micro steel tube mortar composite pile in soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[7] YANG Feng, HE Shi-hua, WU Yao-jie, JI Li-yan, LUO Jing-jing, YANG Jun-sheng. Tunnel face stability analysis by the upper-bound finite element method with rigid translatory moving element in heterogeneous clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[8] MI Bo, XIANG Yan-yong, . Model experiment and calculation analysis of excavation-seepage stability for shallow shield tunneling in sandy ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[9] ZHOU Zi-han, CHEN Zhong-hui, WANG Jian-ming, ZHANG Ling-fan, NIAN Geng-qian. Catastrophe analysis of open-pit slope stability under blasting load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[10] BI Zong-qi, GONG Quan-mei, ZHOU Shun-hua, CHENG Qian, . Experimental study of the evolution law of vertical soil arch under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[11] SHI Zhen-ning, QI Shuang-xing, FU Hong-yuan, ZENG Ling, HE Zhong-ming, FANG Rui-min, . A study of water content distribution and shallow stability of earth slopes subject to rainfall infiltration [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[12] LIU Yi-yang, SONG Xuan-min, ZHU De-fu, LI Zhu. Dynamic structural mechanical behavior and response characteristics of large key blocks [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[13] SU Yong-hua, LI Cheng-cheng. Stability analysis of slope based on Green-Ampt model under heavy rainfall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[14] ZHU Yan-peng, TAO Jun, YANG Xiao-hui, PENG Jun-guo, WU Qiang, . Design and numerical analyses of high-fill slope strengthened by frame with prestressed anchor-plates [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[15] LU Hai-feng, MENG Xiang-shuai, YAN Wei, YAO Duo-xi, . Circular sliding solution of mining stability and failure depth of floor layered structure on coal face [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 166-174.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!