Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 2971-2980.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1902

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analytical study on longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnels considering axial force

REN Lu-yao, WU Zhen-jie, HUANG Qi-chao, GUAN Zhen-chang   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2023-12-20 Accepted:2024-05-17 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278399).

Abstract: How to estimate the seismic response of shield tunnels reasonably has been a significant issue in both industry and academia. Compared with the transverse seismic response, the longitudinal seismic response is more complex. The shield tunnel is modeled as a Timoshenko beam on Winkler foundations, considering both residual axial force and additional axial force due to longitudinal seismic. A theoretical model was presented to consider the longitudinal and transverse stratum displacements. The longitudinal seismic response of shield tunnels was solved using the finite difference method. The theoretical model and calculation method were validated through case studies of stagger-assembled shield tunnels with a 6.2 m diameter. Considering axial force increased the overall stiffness of shield tunnel, resulting in decreased internal force and deformation response. The proposed method was degraded to the traditional one when the axial force is neglected. The influences of residual axial force, seismic wavelength, seismic incidence angle and foundation reaction coefficient on the longitudinal seismic response were further explored. With the increase of residual axial force, the overall stiffness of shield tunnel increased, and the peak seismic response of shield tunnel decreased. When the incident angle is less than 45°, the influences of residual axial force and foundation reaction coefficient on the peak response were more significant. With the increase of the foundation reaction coefficient, the tunnel deflection and the discontinuous deformation between joints increased. Wavelengths between 20 m and 100 m may lead to greater opening and dislocation between joints. These studies can provide theoretical support for the longitudinal seismic design of shield tunnels.

Key words: shield tunnel, longitudinal seismic response, Timoshenko beam, finite difference solution

CLC Number: 

  • TU 45
[1] HUANG Ming-hua, ZHONG Yu-xuan, LU Jin-bin, WANG Ke-ping. Deformation analysis of underlying shield tunnel induced by foundation pit excavation based on discontinuous foundation beam model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[2] WANG Xiao-gang, YANG Jian-ping, CHEN Wei-zhong, LI Hui, . Structural response characteristics of shield tunnels and analysis of joint stiffness [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 485-495.
[3] HUANG Da-wei, LIU Jia-xuan, TAN Man-sheng, DENG Xiang-hao, HUANG Yong-liang, WENG You-hua, CHEN Sheng-ping. Scaled model test on interaction between a shield tunnel and ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 371-381.
[4] ZHANG Zhi-guo, WO Wei, ZHU Zheng-guo, HAN Kai-hang, SUN Miao-miao, . Fourier energy variational solution of effects on existing tunnels induced by shield tunneling considering coordinated deformation of lining cross-section [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1397-1411.
[5] ZHANG Zhi-guo, LUO Jie, ZHU Zheng-guo, PAN Y T, SUN Miao-miao, . Stability of shield tunnel excavation face under seismic action based on upper bound theorem of limit analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[6] PAN Qiu-jing, WU Hong-tao, ZHANG Zi-long, SONG Ke-zhi, . Prediction of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement within composite strata using multi-physics-informed neural network [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(2): 539-551.
[7] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LI Shuang, XU Kai. Long sequence time series model to predict uplift of segmental lining in shield tunnel based on LightGBM-Informer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3791-3801.
[8] LI Wen-bo, GAN Xiao-lu, LIU Nian-wu, WU Hao, SHEN Shan-shan. Calculation of uplift deformation during shield tunnel excavation based on a short beam-spring model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3755-3767.
[9] HUANG Ji-hui, QIN Shi-kang, ZHAO Yu, CHEN Jing-xu, ZHANG Hao, . Model of interaction between compressed air in the head chamber of shield tunneling and the gas-liquid two-phase flow in surrounding rock [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(12): 3555-3565.
[10] GAO Liu, LÜ Shu-hui, WANG Kui-hua. Dynamic characteristics of defective pile-beam system and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 3095-3104.
[11] ZHONG Xiao-chun, HUANG Si-yuan, HUAI Rong-guo, ZHU Cheng, HU Yi-kang, CHEN Xu-quan, . Longitudinal uplift characteristics of segments of shield tunnels based on buoyancy of grouting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1615-1624.
[12] ZHANG Zhi-guo, YE Tong, ZHU Zheng-guo, PAN Y T, WU Zhong-teng, . Hydraulic and displacement response analysis of shield tunnel in gassy seabed under wave action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1557-1574.
[13] WANG Zu-xian, SHI Cheng-hua, GONG Chen-jie, CAO Cheng-yong, PENG Zhu, SUN Ying-jie, . Calculation model of longitudinal nonlinear equivalent bending stiffness of shield tunnel considering its transverse performance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1295-1308.
[14] WU Hong, YE Zhi, ZHANG Yu-ting, LIU Hua-bei, . Numerical study on seismic behavior of shield tunnel crossing saturated sandy strata with different densities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[15] LIU Yong, ZHOU Yi-sheng, SUO Xiao-ming, FAN Hao-bo, CAO Yi-ze, DU Zhi-tian, . Model test on the deformation law of shield tunnel underpassing high speed railway roadbed [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 941-951.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!